Samktalksshit and 265 others

3.2K posts

Samktalksshit and 265 others

Samktalksshit and 265 others

@samktalksshit

if you are reading my bio it's probably because I said something that deep down you know is true so decided to stalk my profile 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Katılım Ağustos 2021
0 Takip Edilen40 Takipçiler
Lefttwt Confessions
Lefttwt Confessions@AnonLefttwt·
"I feel no patriotism at all. If my country were attacked, I wouldn't die fighting for it"
Lefttwt Confessions tweet media
English
293
676
6.1K
1.3M
Samktalksshit and 265 others
@mectin8 @nas49001254 @grok Thanks ChatGPT How does that make me personally financially better off? This is crypto. We are in it for the money. Anyone who buys Chainlink for "the tech" is an idiot. You're taking financial risk for no gain
English
0
0
0
56
Mectin-Iver
Mectin-Iver@mectin8·
Chainlink (LINK) is foundational infrastructure for decentralized finance (DeFi), real-world assets (RWAs), and cross-chain applications. It’s not just another token—it’s the leading decentralized oracle network that connects smart contracts to real-world data, APIs, and other blockchains in a secure, tamper-resistant way.4 Why Oracles (and Chainlink) Matter Blockchains are isolated and deterministic—they can’t natively access external data like prices, weather, election results, or sports scores without risking manipulation. Smart contracts need reliable “oracles” to pull in off-chain information trustlessly. Chainlink dominates this space: •Powers majority of DeFi (lending like Aave, derivatives, stablecoins, etc.) with price feeds that have secured trillions in value.4 •Enables tokenization of RWAs (real estate, bonds, treasuries, etc.) by providing verified data and compliance tools for institutions (Swift, DTCC, JPMorgan, ANZ pilots).13 •Future of DeFi and governance: As finance moves on-chain, you need secure data for collateral valuation, liquidations, derivatives, prediction markets, and DAOs. Chainlink’s decentralized nodes (with staking, reputation, and multi-layer security) minimize single points of failure. It’s expanding into Functions (off-chain compute), Automation, and more.0 Without reliable oracles, DeFi stays limited and fragile. Chainlink has become the de facto standard, much like TCP/IP for the internet. CCIP: Cross-Chain Interoperability The top post complains about “$357 fees on $20M+ transferred with 649 txs.” This is early-stage adoption, not fraud: •CCIP lets developers transfer tokens and arbitrary data/messages securely across chains (Ethereum ↔ Solana, L2s, etc.) with programmable logic. It uses lock/mint, burn/mint, etc., mechanisms.10 •High value transferred ($20M in one day, billions cumulatively) shows real usage (e.g., Lido, Interport, Maple Finance flows). Fees are intentionally low/percentage-based + gas (0.045-0.5% range depending on lane/token) to encourage volume.37 •Revenue does accrue via the Chainlink Reserve: Fees (paid in various tokens) are converted to LINK and locked long-term. This creates buy pressure and supply dynamics as usage grows. Node operators get compensated, but protocol revenue feeds back into the ecosystem.11 Low daily fees today reflect growing pains and competition, but institutional pilots (Swift tokenized assets, bank settlements) and migrations from less secure bridges signal scaling. Volume > fees is normal for infrastructure (think Visa vs. their merchant fees). Role of the LINK Token LINK isn’t just “hype”—it has direct utility: •Payments: Users pay node operators in LINK (or other assets with surcharge; others convert to LINK).48 •Staking/Security: Node operators and holders stake LINK for cryptoeconomic security (slashable for bad behavior). Stakers earn rewards. This aligns incentives for reliability.48 •Value Accrual: As CCIP, Data Feeds, VRF, etc., grow, demand for LINK rises. Fixed max supply (1B), Reserve accumulation, and staking create deflationary pressure over time.11 It’s a utility + security token powering the network. Price is volatile (like all crypto) and influenced by market cycles, but real usage drives long-term demand. Addressing the Skepticism (“Savings not passed to consumers, LINK not needed”) •Consumer savings: Cross-chain efficiency does reduce friction/costs vs. centralized bridges or CEXs (faster, more secure, composable DeFi). Early fees go to securing the network; scale should improve economics. •“Not needed”: Many protocols integrate it because alternatives are riskier or less decentralized. Adoption by big players (DeFi blue-chips + TradFi) validates it. •Appreciation: Tied to network growth. If CCIP/RWAs explode (as many expect with tokenization), LINK benefits. But crypto is high-risk—past performance ≠ future, and it’s not “guaranteed.”
English
2
0
0
357
Nastardamus ⏣
Nastardamus ⏣@nas49001254·
This is probably the biggest fraud in the crypto history they’ll tell us that every day huge player using CCIP, yet we made the ridiculous $357 of revenue today ! The worst part? With only 649 transactions!!!! So who the hell is using it then ?
Nastardamus ⏣ tweet mediaNastardamus ⏣ tweet media
English
12
6
88
13.4K
Samktalksshit and 265 others
@mectin8 @nas49001254 @grok Great. Future of decentralized oracles. But saving won't be passed to the consumer and the link token isn't needed and will never appreciate in value So it begs the question - why should we care?
English
1
0
1
365
Mectin-Iver
Mectin-Iver@mectin8·
@nas49001254 @grok please explain to these low IQ haters how important Chainlink is in the future of decentralized finance and governance and what role the link token plays !!
English
6
0
2
2.2K
Uri Kurlianchik
Uri Kurlianchik@VerminusM·
Jews are great at science, business, entertainment and, as we learned in the last 80 years, war. What are some things Jews are not good at?
English
777
28
1.2K
475.8K
Samktalksshit and 265 others
Samktalksshit and 265 others@samktalksshit·
@kurujaat5211 @PariGlow @rwlesq So? Indians steal 10 billion GBP of innocent British people's money via call centre scams every year. And you think we owe them a 1 billion dollar diamond because it was mined there? What about the money earned in the UK?
English
1
0
0
19
Chasing Ennui
Chasing Ennui@rwlesq·
Who should it be returned to? The British Royal Family has had it since 1850, when it was given to Queen Victoria by the British East India Company. The British East India Company got it the year before, when it was surrendered by the then 10-year-old Maharaja Sir Duleep Singh of the Sikh Empire to the British at the end of the Second Anglo-Sikh War. He had it because he had been installed as Maharaja of the Sikh Empire in 1843 after a coup in 1839 and several years of instability. The Sikh Empire had it since 1813, when its founder, Ranjit Singh, took it from Shuja Shah Durrani after Shuja Shah Durrani was deposed and exiled from the Durrani Empire in Afghanistan. Shuja Shah Durrani claims that Ranjit Singh had his son tortured until he gave him the diamond. Shuja Shah Durrani had it because the founder of the Durrani Empire, Ahmad Shah, was given it c. 1750 by either the grandson of Nader Shah or the head of Nader Shah's harem, following Nader Shah's assassination. Nader Shah was the founder of the Afsharid dynasty of Iran. He got it when he looted the Mughal Empire in India in 1739 and took it from the Peacock Throne of the Mughal emperors. Before that, it gets a little hazy. However, it appears to have bounced around the Mughal empire since 1526, occasionally being gifted or stolen (or stolen while being gifted). The Mughal Empire got it as ransom after Humayun, the son of Babur, the founder of the Mughal Empire, got it in ransom for a family captured during the Battle of Panipat, in which the Mughal Empire was founded with the conquest of the Delhi Sultanate in northern India. The Delhi Sultanate had it since 1310, after it subjugated the Kakatiya dynasty of southern India. I wasn't able to easily determine where they got it from. So yeah, the British may have it as a result of colonialism and empire, but that colonialism and empire dates back to before the United Kingdom existed. Maybe the British Royals shouldn't keep it, but chances are that whoever they return it to is just the second-to-last (or third-to-last or fourth-to-last) conqueror of the diamond.
non aesthetic things@PicturesFoIder

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani says he would encourage King Charles III to return the 105.6 carat Kohinoor diamond to India

English
233
532
8K
1.5M
JerryRigEverything
JerryRigEverything@ZacksJerryRig·
@karolineleavitt Your baby has the same age gap with you as you do with your husband. Think about that for a second.
English
651
1.2K
47.1K
1.2M
Karoline Leavitt
Karoline Leavitt@karolineleavitt·
On May 1st, Viviana aka “Vivi” joined our family, and our hearts instantly exploded with love. 💕 She is perfect and healthy, and her big brother is joyfully adjusting to life with his new baby sister. We are enjoying every moment in our blissful newborn bubble. Thank you to everyone who reached out with prayers during my pregnancy - I truly felt them throughout the entire experience. God is Good.🙏
Karoline Leavitt tweet media
English
32.2K
25.5K
326.4K
23.7M
Samktalksshit and 265 others
Samktalksshit and 265 others@samktalksshit·
@PariGlow @rwlesq The point is that India scam 10 billion per year from British citizens via call centre scams. Why the fuck should Britain give them something worth 1 billion back?
English
0
0
0
7
saffron queen
saffron queen@PariGlow·
@samktalksshit @rwlesq Ahh. Greatest looters in the history are blaming others for the crimes that they did. Suits the European Nazis.
saffron queen tweet media
English
2
0
6
2.3K
Lancesico 🇱🇨
Lancesico 🇱🇨@Bornakang·
This is hilarious cause why she did that lmao
Lancesico 🇱🇨 tweet media
English
256
6.1K
194.7K
3M
saffron queen
saffron queen@PariGlow·
@rwlesq It's going to be returned to the Government of India. Not to an Individual ruler FFS.
English
28
0
236
33.6K
Caitlin Johnstone
Caitlin Johnstone@caitoz·
Basically every Israel-Palestine debate goes like this: "Israel did X." "Yeah, because the Palestinians did Y." "Yeah, because Israel did Z." "Yeah but only because the Arabs did A." But if you bring the debate back far enough in time, eventually you get to the part where the western world forcibly dropped a brand new ethnostate on top of a pre-existing civilization without the permission of — and to the extreme detriment of — the people who were already living there. Sure you can go further back and say "Oh yeah well the Jews lived there thousands of years ago," but that's just silly. There's no valid reason to believe some Jewish guy in New York City even has any meaningful lineage connecting him to that land more strongly than any random Muslim in Turkey or wherever, and even if there was, it would still be absurd to cite ancient history as the basis for a territorial claim. I'm only a few generations removed from my ancestry in Ireland and Scotland, but it would be ridiculous for me to show up demanding the home of someone who lives there. So the original source for the grievance is clearly the artificial creation of an ethnonationalist state in the mid-20th century, and the push by Zionists and western imperialists to make it happen. And how has that decision worked out? You see the results before you. Generations of nonstop violence and abuse, culminating in the slaughter and chaos throughout the middle east today. This means that creating Israel was a mistake. A mistake that needs to be corrected. Zionists will collapse into a shrieking pile of vitriol and hyperbole when you say this, claiming you're calling for the extermination of Jews, but this is false. Certainly ending a national order premised on putting the interests of Jews before Palestinians and righting the wrongs of the past would inconvenience a lot of the Jewish people who've been living there, but there's no basis for the claim that it would entail their deaths. Apartheid South Africa was dismantled without the extermination of millions of white people, and there's no reason to believe the dismantling of apartheid Israel would entail the extermination of Jews. The Israel experiment has been tried, and it has failed. It is time to try something else.
English
873
3.6K
15.3K
949.1K
Abbas Nasir
Abbas Nasir@abbasnasir59·
@PeterTatchell Wouldn't a tasered man's palm close around the weapon into a fist, as he'd suffer from muscle paralysis? Do the bobbies don't know this?
English
31
1
7
1.5K
Peter Tatchell
Peter Tatchell@PeterTatchell·
How does repeatedly kicking a terrorist in the head disarm him? The first priority should’ve been to grab his hands to remove the knife & to prevent him detonating a bomb And why are police interviews & media reports not mentioning that he also stabbed a Muslim man?
Owen Jones@owenjonesjourno

Hold on - what? If police officers think someone might be carrying explosives, protocol is to kick them in the head repeatedly like this? Is that actual police protocol? If so, how is it a wise police protocol? Can someone explain the reasoning?

English
937
173
379
156.9K
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
The Mail doesn't think seem to think workers, of all ages, are worth £15 an hour. That's fair pay for a fair day's work, with money workers will put back into the economy. We are the party for workers. Vote Green on 7th May.
Zack Polanski tweet media
English
4.5K
1.4K
7.5K
1.6M
Samuel Leeds
Samuel Leeds@samuel_leeds·
I don’t understand why we have the minimum wage. It’s a dumb idea. Government shouldn’t be involved if there is a willing buyer / willing seller. Also, employment rights shouldn’t exist. If you aren’t happy, leave. Any good employer will pay what is deserved and have commercial sense to treat valuable staff well.
English
308
10
265
36.5K
Owen Jones
Owen Jones@owenjonesjourno·
Keir Starmer. A man we were told would be defined by his competence and integrity. A prime minister with literally nothing to recommend him. A void, a political waste of space, a convenient frontman and a useful idiot for an odious political faction. politico.eu/article/keir-s…
Owen Jones tweet media
English
55
358
965
18.7K
Kemi Badenoch
Kemi Badenoch@KemiBadenoch·
Why does Sir Keir Starmer want to be Prime Minister? It’s hard to know. But what’s certain is that Britain is paying the price of having a PM with no interest in doing the job. Perhaps you think ‘all politicians are liars’. Yet the disgraceful appointment of Peter Mandelson points not just to dishonesty, but to a prime minister too idle to ask basic questions and too weak to face the answers. Even by his own defence (fanciful as it is), Starmer has shown himself lacking in any grip, to be lazy in his thinking and, as it turns out, too idle to ask the most basic questions of his staff. In fact, the real scandal is not the appointment of Mandelson - serious though that is - but the woeful direction of our country under Starmer.
English
756
763
6.1K
139.9K
Samktalksshit and 265 others
Samktalksshit and 265 others@samktalksshit·
@nexta_tv Fat ginger rat is just doing it to mess with markets and make his son's money "But he's freeing the people on Iran" Trump doesn't give AF about the people in Iran. The only reason the protest murders upset him is because he wanted it to be his bombs that did it
English
0
0
2
520
NEXTA
NEXTA@nexta_tv·
⚡️⚡️ Trump has lost his temper and threatens to destroy every nuclear power plant and every bridge in Iran This will happen if Tehran and Washington fail to reach a deal. Yesterday, Iran opened fire in the Strait of Hormuz. Many shots were directed at a French vessel and a British cargo ship. “That wasn’t very nice, was it?” the U.S. president wrote on his social media.
NEXTA tweet media
English
28
70
279
40.2K
Samuel Leeds
Samuel Leeds@samuel_leeds·
We just signed the contract to buy our dream home in Phucket 🇹🇭 It cost just 56m BAHT (£1.3m), and is a freehold property next to Bang Tao beach 🏝️ The best part is we will now qualify to get our official Welathy Global Citizenships, meaning we can spend as much time as we like in Thailand and pay 0% tax of our global income! Most people assume you the only countries that are require zero income taxes are Dubai, Monaco and Cayman Islands, but there are so many other great options - not just great for business, but also go raising a family.
Samuel Leeds tweet media
English
504
115
1.4K
1.8M