SL

12K posts

SL

SL

@sanelynch

Chickentown. Katılım Temmuz 2010
1.3K Takip Edilen503 Takipçiler
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@frank_morrish He averages 75! away from home. Head averages 30 for context. Sure there are a couple of times he could have got himself in a bit more, but these guys are going on like he's Graeme Hick or something.
English
0
0
0
138
frank_morrish
frank_morrish@frank_morrish·
When he works it out?! He averages 56 after 31 tests. He’s already one of the best players in the world. He’s just also a massive bozo. The two can be true simultaneously.
English
27
10
694
95.2K
Richard Johnson
Richard Johnson@richardmarcj·
In the last century, 8 out of 22 UK prime ministers have not been known by their first names: James MacDonald Arthur Chamberlain Robert Eden Maurice Macmillan James Wilson Leonard Callaghan James Brown Alexander Johnson
English
14
10
284
20.6K
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@crow_lands It's clearly Corbyn. Think that is the subtext.
English
0
0
3
59
Clive Martin
Clive Martin@clive_mart1n·
One thing that’s really changed in right wing Britain - and here you can see the MAGA model in play - is the amount of ‘personalities’ involved. Endless splinter group heads, media figures, content creators, influencers. 15 years ago you only knew TR, NG and an amorphous mob.
English
5
5
82
10.9K
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@DespoticInroad Are you really pro Linehan harassing a 17 year old?
English
0
0
2
185
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@crow_lands Loathe as I am to believe it, this is largely probably what Starmer is too, perhaps without the long-formed ideological commitments that Brown and his ilk had.
English
1
0
1
47
crow lands
crow lands@crow_lands·
What made it odd at the time, he'd pulled out some 'British jobs for British workers' stuff but everyone sort of knew he was an (earnest) Fabian socdem at heart who'd got trapped like a wasp in a can trying to go with the contemporary sentiment, absolutely a 'fake plastic tree'
Daniel Gerke@drgerke1

In 15 years we’ve gone from the PM correctly identifying someone as a bigot (and being torn to shreds for it) to the three biggest parties arguing over how best to achieve mass deportations of asylum seekers.

English
1
0
2
170
Despotic Inroad
Despotic Inroad@DespoticInroad·
This is excellent. When people refer to Liverpool’s “Rebel City”/progressive/Left-wing political culture, you have to qualify it by saying **since the 1980s**, before which it was further to the Right than any other large urban area. People also conflate Liverpool with what is basically the Liverpool Riverside constituency — that’s home to the wonderfully regenerated City Centre, a significant student population, an ethnically diverse postcode or two, and many public sector/young professionals etc. It’s where the Greens have councillors and where they generally come 2nd in elections (after LAB), and where you’ll find the craft ale bars, the trendy suburbs, cafes and over-priced coffee. Places like Walton and Knowsley, and even West Derby, are much more Brexit-y, much whiter, generally poorer (the former two being amongst the poorest places in the country). REFORM come 2nd (after LAB) in elections. And the specific political culture/“Common Sense” is less self-consciously “Left-progressive”, and more of an anti-establishment, fervently anti-Tory, workerist (werkerist), Left(ish) populist vibe (although this is only consciously ideological in a small number of cases OFC). It’s just as suspicious of mass/illegal migration and “woke” ideologies as anywhere, and you won’t find much love for any softly-softly approaches to law & order etc.
UnHerd@unherd

What do you call a Scouser in a house? A burglar. It’s a typically anti-Liverpool joke — and an outdated one at that. Read @ledgerlomasm on a Mersey miracle 👇 buff.ly/bEpeBZY

English
4
14
68
17.3K
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@DespoticInroad But they're clearly quite different to other Brexity seats in that they vote massively for Labour. Reform might pick up a couple of thousand votes but they're hardly troubling the scorers. Definitely makes Liverpool somewhat of an anomaly.
English
1
0
0
165
Despotic Inroad
Despotic Inroad@DespoticInroad·
@sanelynch They voted Leave AND they’re extremely safe Labour seats. Those are two separate things - a general election and a referendum. The article says exactly this.
English
2
0
8
498
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@TheNewWorldmag @paulmasonnews Reminder that one of Paul's parents was the headteacher of a school and he owns a house in Zone 1 London. He's pretty posh himself.
English
0
0
1
94
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@DespoticInroad Their predictions are usually wrong though. Recall a Matt Bolton essay (since deleted) saying Labour would get less than 50 seats in 2017.
English
0
0
0
46
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@Las_Atracciones Would love to know what his Letterboxd username is....
English
1
0
0
62
SL
SL@sanelynch·
Extradite Aaronovitch
Nederlands
0
2
3
178
SL retweetledi
GoliathFan1952
GoliathFan1952@ByYourLogic·
the only real difference between this and what Alex Jones did with Sandy Hook is stopping just short of naming the parents who are supposedly lying. but that’s only because they want to paint Palestinians as a faceless blob whose antisemitism and dishonesty are racial facts
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook

Why is the 'liberal' media peddling the vilest genocide apologism? I can't put this strongly enough. Howard Jacobson's article in today’s Observer newspaper may be one the vilest pieces of journalism published in Britain in living memory, arguing that any reporting of Israel's documented slaughter of many thousands of Palestinian children in Gaza is a "blood libel" and antisemitic. It is pure genocide apologism. But far worse is the fact that the Guardian Media Group signed off his column. This isn't the work of one Zionist loon. A whole army of journalists brought it to print. And note: Jacobson, odious as he is, isn't responsible for the choice of photo. That is entirely down to the Observer newsroom. I worked at both the Guardian and the Observer, its Sunday sister paper, for many years. The comment editor, the photo editor, the revise sub-editor, the Observer's chief editor and all the section heads would have approved not only Jacobson's text but that photo too. What on earth did they all imagine that "illustrative" photo of a blood-smeared doll suggested? * That the many thousands of children blown to pieces by Israeli bombs are a fiction. * That all the children decomposing under rubble are made up. * That all the unidentified children buried in Gaza's sands are a lie. * That all the children dying of epidemics like polio or starving to death from Israel's aid blockade are an invention. That any single journalist imagined for a moment that this was an acceptable article or photo in the midst of a genocide is astounding enough. But that a whole phalanx of the most influential and “liberal” journalists in the country backed it without a second thought tells us something about the depraved culture that passes for journalism in the western establishment media. These elite journalists are completely divorced from reality. They have no moral core, they live and work as fanatical ideologues for western supremacism. They are as racist as their forebears who cheerled Britain's subjugation and colonisation of the rest of the globe. There is no hope of ever having a healthy world as long as these war-mongers and genocide apologists are allowed to remain in charge of shaping our consciousness.

English
13
842
6.4K
248K
SL retweetledi
James Greig
James Greig@jamesdgreig·
I wrote about Starmer’s speech last night, and the disregard he has consistently shown towards the lives of civilians in Palestine and Lebanon dazeddigital.com/life-culture/a…
English
12
84
349
23.5K
SL
SL@sanelynch·
@huseyinkishi You're living in Australia?!
English
0
0
0
37