sayurichiCK

@Paradise1known @StereoxxxX also checkout @MoonshotDapp . soon to be the pump .fun of Avalanche?

I was an Avax maxi before and @StereoxxxX post changed my life. He started to post about pump.fun and I started to dig into it and decided to max bid everything lol until I hit a home run. #michi I can't believe how low volume network I was trading on. I thought solana was bad and avalanche was nice with good memes lol that shit ain't moving. I am so glad I moved to solana. That little change in my life made me a millionaire. Now I'm a michillionaire and soon to be multi michillionaire. We are sending so much higher🔥 Michi gang is real.

@TradingAloha @0xGuru the sun, and a compact fluorescent lightbulb can both be used as a light source. even if you took 1 million lightbulbs, you couldn't match the output of the sun. a $200k dev is a 10x dev. a 10x dev with Claude/GPT is a 30x dev. more workers arent necessarily better.

@0xGuru I would argue its probably better to pay 2 people 100k over 1 person 175k-200k. Scrape up the difference and double the output.

Every role in web3 is “head of xxx”, “director of xxx”. Are all these positions 1 deep? Where are the 2-3 deep positions that are out there grinding and getting the exposure and reps in as part of the team? I never see these positions advertised and don’t think they truly exist.

@Juzzwashere @thearena I actually agree. anything with ponzinomics will have their 15 min of fame, but if you've been in crypto long enough you know that recreating (social media) and adding tips is not gonna work in the long run. I think @MoonshotDapp is a better implementation of "SocialFi"

I don’t honestly see the point of @thearena versus here, please open my mind…. As it stands it’s just a replication of things here….

@zatoichi42 @nikzh > The theory that lower fees attract additional adoption has been disproven time and time again. I mean, you're being pedantic, but if there is chain congestion, it's been proven time and time again people use another chain or not transact at all.

Half the argument for the small block is exactly protecting Bitcoin from the future reduction in subsidy. The larger the block, the lower the fees. Supply and demand works in Bitcoin same as everywhere. The reason BCH, Monero and the like are drowning, is their disregard for basic economics. The theory that lower fees attract additional adoption has been disproven time and time again. If you believe in it so much, you should be in KASPA which is POW and has fees so low, transfers are basically free, while the speed is faster than majority of POS coins. Some miners will drop off, the difficulty will decrease and others will come in to take their place. We have a precedent with a recent China ban where a large percentage of miners was taken down in a short period of time. This happened on smaller scale in several countries. This also happened in previous halvings.

So the Runes fad is over, the fee rate is back to 20 sat per byte, and Bitcoin's security budget has almost halved 🔮 Laser eyes have been proven wrong once again: sustainable large fees are not happening; Bitcoin's security is diminishing 📉 The 1 MB limit has to go 🎶

@MPSilver727 @ChrisPacia if you're thinking it has to be a single chain, then kinda. but even then, there are still a handful of different chains that can work. twitter.com/_patrickogrady… but the answer is interoperable app-chains. Each built for custom use cases.

Problem is, you can't have a secure or decentralized network that provides fast cheap transactions for the entire globe 24/7. You can only do that if it's centralized. BCH's proposal would conclude with 1 - 3 supercomputers running the whole network, kind of like visa. Therefore, people would rather use BTC with the high fees as it's more secure and a better store of value.

I don't think Bitcoiners realize that the "store of value" function of money is not a separate function from "medium of exchange". By definition, when you acquire an asset for use as a medium of exchange there is a temporal element to it. You cannot immediately exchange it for the good or service you want. Some time must past in between when you acquire it and when you trade it. The asset is then "storing value" until you ultimately trade it for what you want. But this is part of what it means to be a medium of exchange. Not some kind of separate function.

@tommy50107317 @steveinpursuit > no one is using your chain. why does that matter? BTC maximalists made it seem like the world would end if you changed the 1mb parameter. In code, we can test this and we did. they lied to hold onto control.

I can hardly bear the stupidity of people seeing BTC fees drop to $10 and declaring that big blockers were wrong, there was no conspiracy. Extraordinary. Imagine some engineers intentionally redesigned the LA highway system to make it exclusively one-lane roads, and they openly say "Traffic congestion is good!" The big-laners point out that actually this will cause extreme problems and will make driving damn near impossible in rush hour. Rush hour comes, the whole thing is gridlocked, and finally a week later at 3am the roads clear somewhat, with only mild congestion. Then, some idiot looks at the 3am traffic and goes, "See? You big-laners were wrong! There was no conspiracy!" Words cannot describe...

@strayyhat @DominicCarb if you genuinely want to know why you're wrong it's because you would need to count the totality of avalanche subnet transactions against solana's L1. you can launch L1s on avax, whereas sol is a tailored L1. tokenterminal is not sophisticated enough to graph that data.

@DominicCarb doesnt really matter with the exact number, its just from token terminal , but i dont think you would argue its more users and transactions there?

I hear a lot about how amazing the UX is on Solana so I figured I’d give it an unfiltered try as a user. 1. Phantom Wallet: Very buggy, the Face ID login glitches all the time. As a mobile wallet it’s very similar to others on the market, noting special. 2. The Chain: Several failed transactions over and over again. Of the 10 transactions I’d send about 30% would fail. The speed also didn’t feel any different from AVAX or a Layer 2. 3. Jupiter: Felt like a regular DEX aggregator. Didn’t find anything special or unique. I think what Solana does really well is its community hypes its stuff up. They seem to rally around narratives. If you had a different experience please let me know below

@MangoWeb3 @steadyworldwide seems like creating a community coin on moonshot.meme would be a good partnership $STEADY would earn the trading fees associated

Question… If you were the Business Development lead for @steadyworldwide, who would you choose to partner with? Note: This is a genuine question and phase 1 of the job interview. 🤝

@OSDMenjoyor @nikzh It's you who doesn't understand that there isn't a single truly decentralized L2. go ahead and try to list one, prove your ignorance. I could use a good laugh.

@nikzh It absolutely is. You don't understand what is important and innovative about Bitcoin. People like you lack the perspective and philosophy needed to understand why it's of #1 importance to maintain decentralization. Not that you care shilling sol lol.

Roger's book should be an important read for those who joined crypto after 2017 as I think most of them have no idea what happened to Bitcoin and how much it did divert from "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System".

@CommunityofAvax $PICKLE moonshot.meme/charts/PICKLE

What memecoins are you looking at on this beautiful Monday?

@_oniking @farmiefinance @el33th4xor the truth is if you are being told what to invest, you're pumping someone's bags. The whitepapers are freely available avalabs.org/whitepapers you can DYOR and understand for yourself, or you can be told to buy doge and BTC like the rest of the sheep.

@farmiefinance @el33th4xor The truth is I would like to hear the arguments...

Decoupled State Machine Replication is here.

@dogwifcrocs @avax you guys have 1/10th the required liquidity.. and about 1/10th the required volume.

@avax 👀👀

The Avalanche Foundation recognizes the importance of fostering and supporting community initiatives on Avalanche, including the creativity and culture of community coins. The Foundation has reserved a portion of the Culture Catalyst program to include community coins, doing so within an established eligibility criteria framework. This framework, laid out in these categories, is designed to identify community coin projects that show stability, growth potential, and a commitment to fair practices in crypto: ✅ Fairly Launched ✅ Snipe Bot Resistant ✅ Secure ✅ High Holder Count ✅ Low Concentration ✅ Broad Liquidity Provisioning ✅ High Liquidity ✅ Minimum Lifespan ✅ Minimum Market Cap ✅ Daily Trading Volume ✅ Native to Avalanche The purpose of disclosing the eligibility criteria here is to enunciate the Foundation’s values and provide direction to the community. These criteria are subject to change in the Foundation’s sole discretion; meeting the eligibility criteria does not imply that the Foundation will support a coin, and additional criteria may be used to determine which coins to include in the Culture Catalyst program. Read the full blog for more details and disclosures: avax.network/blog/avalanche…

@dogwifcrocs @GeckoInuAvax Gecko literally made fake pools for the launch of $DWC and used the stolen funds to buy their own token. bad look to team up with them. maybe you guys are complicit.

We're joining the @GeckoInuAvax Culture Alliance. Together we will host community campaigns. Also, they will be reserving an NFT mint allocation for $DWC holders

@TradingAloha @DwightHoward think about the marketing upside of minting out a random celeb's collection. Other people would want to join in as well. but instead you fud and cry over a loss of 1 avax? L mentality.

Not sure anyone caught this but @DwightHoward dropped public mint from 4 Avax to 3 right before public opened because whitelisters were selling under 3. Hahaha what a disaster. Hot garbage liquidity extraction.

@Serialhacker1 @valleyhuds @_auctoritus @milky_selena it does. your definition of it is just incorrect. it's not some cosmic force that will balance right and wrong. It's more like cause and effect. study hard for that test, you will get a passing grade. THAT is what karma is.

any woman who takes care of herself will recognise that she’s only approaching her prime at 30 if you are eating well, and stay in shape this peak is around 28-35 if you are a woman you learn how to dress, what looks good, you master sultry seduction men fear this - unsurprisingly. they will try to secure you before your prime but EVERY sex icon of the past decade has been a woman in her 30s. they have resorted to pseudopxdophillic propaganda. goebellian level campaign. they don’t actually like the acne riddled teen. your fav, Margot Robbie, at 18 and 33. be honest with yourself

@ExcelBaller This is true only until BTC loses it's number 1 spot. Utility will matter at one point and the market will reflect it. Quote me in many years.

Buy coins that have high FDV, low float, no history of a working product, no ability or track record of generating fees, but being shilled by big accounts and you will make it Buy coins with MC close to FDV, good emissions schedule and tokenomics, history of working product, top fee generating, but not being shilled by big accounts and you ngmi Will delete if wrong

@im_uname 1) People don't care about the mission/philosophy, they just want to get rich. 2) Community relies on donations from whales to build anything. flipstarter should be irrelevant, not main source. 3) BTC maxis will always fud BCH, and newbs won't know who to believe.

it's now 2024 and i can see at least three problem points in BCH, thankfully none of them are nearly as big as past disasters even if they explode not gonna spell out any tho, iykyk let's keep things healthy, growing and vigilant, don't take shortcuts, we'll be fine.

@CryptoSeq I think the issue isn't the tech, It's that early backers (insiders) get to stake their pre-allocated funds and dump the rewards on everyone who isn't an insider.

@cryptofishx so you're saying we should use customer deposits to lock into our own validators? what happens when you have 2000 avax locked and a user wants to bridge their avax back? the better solution is to remove the 2000 avax requirement

To add, L2s like Blast have paved the way to growth back a new subnet: Farmers bridge AVAX to new subnet Which is staked by protocol into benqi or gogopool Congrats - protocol just secured the AVAX for its validator set Users can now earn staked AVAX yield AND airdrop points (Bonus if there’s MEV-enabled validators for additional rewards!) Now apply this to any of the new subnets coming up, e.g. $hubble, $gunz, $ferdy Avax WILL explode

@el33th4xor $DIDI > $KIMBO didiavax.com

The people trying to fade memecoins are the same kind of people who were fading pop music in the 60s, calling Banksy a vandal in the 80s, and shittalking rap in the 90s.