Truman Scopes

894 posts

Truman Scopes banner
Truman Scopes

Truman Scopes

@scopesclassroom

Scopes Classroom: the place for educators, parents/students who are silent- or silenced- by the illiberal atmosphere in our schools. By a teacher, from within.

United States Katılım Şubat 2021
473 Takip Edilen99 Takipçiler
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Why is that “all” you can say? Juuuust enough to imply and suggest but also to deny if we say “we know what you’re doing.” Why can’t he say more? Isn’t that why he resigned? It’s entirely discrediting — and Megyn should have asked (beyond “was it Israel” of course!) much more pointedly for more information he was free to now tell- if it was true.
English
0
0
0
555
The Megyn Kelly Show
The Megyn Kelly Show@MegynKellyShow·
.@joekent16jan19: “All I can say is that there were additional leads that we needed to run down and fully investigate, and that just simply was not done from the time that Tyler Robinson turned himself in and was arrested and his fingerprints were found on the rifle...” megynkelly.com/2026/03/20/joe…
English
161
161
1.1K
64.6K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
It’s like saying “is the sky blue?” And responding “well define your terms!! What do you mean by sky? And by blue??” It’s pedantic and avoids the responsibility of the practical results of your worldview. “Right to exist” isn’t a legal or moral phrase; it derives from the incessant and continued project to legally and nobly destroy a nation-state based on premises that no other nation-state faces. The answer to “right to exist” is wrapped in the same argument that Israel has a right to defend itself against existential threats as any nation would- but only one nation must. To answer TC: Britain does have a right to exist. So does Nigeria and Brazil and Cuba and Morocco and Egypt. If attacked, none of those nations would be told not to defend or stand down. But one nation is told that! Therefore, the phrase “right to exist” is invoked to suggest that Israel, too, can do what all other nations would do.
English
97
3
120
43K
Clash Report
Clash Report@clashreport·
Tucker Carlson: I don’t want Israel to be destroyed. I don’t want any country to be destroyed at all.
English
1.8K
5.6K
30.3K
3.6M
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Truly- I read this as funny but the butt of the joke to me is the person answering the door who will be caught on all those cameras. The main figure is so obvious that it’s the person (here a white woman of course) we know will be embarrassing herself and the politicians who let fraud go on or even encouraged it. Honestly, Nick, I would lear into it.
English
0
0
1
80
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
@GovPressOffice You do realize I’m trying to help America eliminate fraud and waste right? No need to try and make me look like the bad guy for exposing fraud. People are over it. Start working for the people and not against them.
English
5.8K
29.2K
276.7K
3.7M
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Yes it’s always a reaction to the things others do. Shooting up a synagogue is a reaction. Murdering Israelis in DC was a reaction. Blocking campus and taking over buildings is a reaction. Flying passenger planes into skyscrapers was a reaction. Charlie Hebdo was a reaction. Madrid and London were reactions. Taking athletes as hostages in Munich was a reaction. If only we’d stop drawing Muhammad or defending ourselves or eating pork or having a non Islamic republic. Note how they’re all after 1948. But also the Barbary pirates were a reaction. The crusades were a reaction…
English
0
0
0
3
Dave Smith
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith·
Islam is such a violent religion. Every time we murder a bunch of their children, they try to kill some of us. Disgusting.
English
8.2K
10.6K
91.6K
7.5M
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Fully respectfully, Mr M: PLEASE tell us that you recognize that this is of a piece with the debates about anti Semitism in which you are effectively on the side of the Churchill haters. Don’t you see that the people who advocate for removing Churchill ARE THE SAME PEOPLE who argue as you did with @GadSaad about cultural takeovers or whom you call propagandists because they are vehemently pro Israel and therefore criticize you for some of your guests? I would defend you as truly interested in multiple sides. But it’s also true that you express views (which is fine too.). But those invites and views have practical effects. Please tell us that you see the nexus between the outrage re the banknote and the battles in which you seem to be (or for all practical purposes, are) on the side of those who want Churchill gone!
English
0
0
1
246
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
But it’s somewhat within GOP control. Reasons progressives will sweep in November (in no particular order): 1. conservative in-fighting; 2. a lack of clean rejection of extremist language (this does not include good faith criticism of Israel which would be easier to distinguish if clear and obvious Jew haters were called out early and often- see # 1); 3. lack of a vote or at least making Dems argue their losing side on SAVE; 4. the loss of Charlie’s voice and influence- and the morale-hit the right took afterwards, when his family and org became a target for absolute lunatics (see #1 and 2). Iran may also become a factor. But of all these, the SAVE inaction is the least understandable. The others are somewhat out of any one entity’s control. This one could be handled by our majority- even if it didn’t pass.
English
0
0
1
200
Jesse Kelly
Jesse Kelly@JesseKellyDC·
Far be it from me to defend John Thune, but he doesn’t have the votes. He doesn’t have the votes because red state Republicans stay home on primary day. Or they vote for the current loser who’s in there. Therefore the “GOP” senate is a mirage. We don’t have the votes.
English
1.4K
396
3.4K
155.8K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
@EWErickson @Glinner J-school alum here: and this is the least surprising news of the day. This is what they teach: find conflict, protect select groups, frame the story. Truth, accuracy, and objectivity are not on the rubric.
English
0
0
5
465
Erick Erickson
Erick Erickson@EWErickson·
This is the lead "reporter" of that ridiculous CNN story. You will not be surprised to learn she uses "they/them" pronouns and graduated from Columbia's journalism program.
Erick Erickson tweet mediaErick Erickson tweet media
English
172
770
4K
114.1K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
@charlescwcooke Those dreadful colonizers put those skyscrapers right in the path of peaceful tourist-pilots trying to enjoy a sunny Tuesday morning over the skies of Manhattan.
English
0
0
3
147
Charles C. W. Cooke
Charles C. W. Cooke@charlescwcooke·
“Nineteen Middle Eastern tourists crossed into New York City Tuesday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally sunny weather . . .”
English
20
66
975
25.3K
Charles C. W. Cooke
Charles C. W. Cooke@charlescwcooke·
Whenever the topic is something the media doesn’t like, journalists all become creative writing professors. The press has done everything possible to obfuscate the facts of this story—and it has done so deliberately.
Charles C. W. Cooke tweet media
English
222
1.4K
7.5K
219.4K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Lack of education. 9/11 was taught the LEAST in NYC public schools and when it was, the motivations and ideologies are left out. “Planes hit buildings” sort of thing. When I was teaching in New York and I brought up 9/11, Timothy McVeigh‘s name was known more than Osama bin Laden’s. Why? Because that was terrorism by a white American. The religion of color and the ideology that leads to suicide pilots? Not a word. “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freeedom fighter” is a common lesson in NYC DOE schools. If you’re under 30 there you’ve never been taught or shown the truth. Fast forward to 2026 when an entire generation+ has been taught lies or not taught at all: people vote for a terror apologist in the name of diversity along with his pro-rape, anti-West wife. Now they host negotiators for occupiers of campus buildings who denied others access and their education for dinner on the taxpayer dime at Gracie. Does education in NYC get better or worse now that he’s there? That should be obvious — but on the bright side, kids will have five breaks a day.
English
0
0
0
10
Isaac
Isaac@isaacrrr7·
¿Alguien me puede explicar cómo la ciudad que sufrió el mayor ataque terrorista islámico de la historia votó por un alcalde musulmán?
Isaac tweet media
Español
12.6K
11.2K
40.4K
930.4K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
@piersmorgan I don’t agree with how you’re handling this squabble but I know you’re not an anti semite. I also know that your show is called uncensored, so “instantly, permanently” blocking people’s opinions - even about you - seems just slightly off-brand.
English
0
0
7
209
Piers Morgan
Piers Morgan@piersmorgan·
New rule for the X community: if you call me antisemitic, you’re now getting blocked. Instantly, permanently, and with no appeals process. I’m having a clear-out of malicious morons who disingenuously weaponise that word to silence legitimate scrutiny/criticism of Israel’s govt.
English
9K
3.4K
38.1K
1.7M
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
But remember: he scolded @GovMikeHuckabee for saying simply that the IDF may take more precautions than the U.S. to protect civilians. Tucker distorted that side comment to self righteously accuse the ambassador of insulting American troops. Huckabee did no such thing. This was all after TC questioned the nobility of the Allies in WW2 and accused America of mass murder in Japan. And now, this “rape” slander.
English
0
0
7
331
Steven Crowder
Steven Crowder@scrowder·
Insinuating the unconditional surrender of the Islamic regime means the subjugation of the Iranian people and the rape of Iranian women at the hands of the US military is not only completely disingenuous, it has no basis in historical events.
English
2K
1.4K
12.6K
526.8K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
@Enezator From Forrest Gump: “somebody get her a harmonica!”
English
0
0
3
1.7K
Enezator
Enezator@Enezator·
The guitar is nice
English
262
396
5.9K
206K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Yeah! It’s none of our business! It’s not like she put a flag up which would be grounds for controversy and impeachment. Here it’s just her discrediting of rape allegations, child murder, and what under any other circumstances she would call war crimes. This has no bearing on her husband’s Jewish or otherwise morally centered constituents who dislike child murder and rape. It’s no one’s business that she excuses rape and murder- as long as she doesn’t hoist a flag we don’t like.
English
0
0
0
88
Myrna 𝕏
Myrna 𝕏@GigaBeers·
Oct. 7: Women raped, families slaughtered, children burned alive. And we’re told asking where someone stands on that is ‘none of our business.’ Think about that.🤔
Myrna 𝕏 tweet media
English
1.4K
5.1K
13.2K
172K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
The problem isn’t an any fact. Yes he tweeted and yes he was killed. Just like this: “Ice cream sales go up in the summer. Shark attacks go up too. Those dastardly ice cream trucks caused shark attacks!” Juxtaposition is everything. I’m one of many heartbroken fans not because she is critical of Israel, which is her excuse for why we are mad (her earlier criticisms of Israel made me reconsider my views because she had so much good faith credibility!) but rather because she now makes comments like this that are designed to have ppl draw a conclusion —- but give juuuuust enough wiggle room for you to say “what!!??? Re Ice cream and sharks- those are facts!”
English
0
0
0
12
JeremyUnplugged
JeremyUnplugged@JeremyUnplugged·
@RS17Pg Whys she need to say he died within 5 months of that statement?
English
1
0
1
74
JeremyUnplugged
JeremyUnplugged@JeremyUnplugged·
Am I reading this incorrectly — or is Megyn Kelly now trying to suggest that Charlie Kirk was killed because he opposed war with Iran? Candace Owens 2.0 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️
JeremyUnplugged tweet media
English
54
53
501
12.4K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Nope. They’ve set this up for a generation now: words and opinions ARE violence, so any action after that is self defense ie morally acceptable. The bomb was merely a proportional and acceptable response to the “vile” protest, don’t you see?!!? Protest a Leftist or the religion of color with words and chants? You’re hateful, “vile,” and yes, prima facie violent. This is the inevitable end-point to a generation exclusively hearing about so-called “hate speech” but intentionally not being taught about free speech.
English
0
0
1
71
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
How is she being destroyed? Her numbers are terrific, as she pointed out. Many, including me, continue listening because we believe in her goodness and talent. But she too can be criticized for her media choices (ie staying silent on CO), when a major part of her show is media criticism and commentary. Kara, Rachel, David M, Bari, Ben, Josh, Michelle, Gayle, Tony, the NYT, BBC, NBC, NPR, ABC, Fox,…all of them are part of her normal routine. She “listens so we don’t have to.” We appreciate her valid and insightful critiques of those and others. So why not Candace? And if not Candace, why can’t that choice be criticized without her being a victim of the “anti Semitism” card??
English
0
0
4
79
Sasha Stone
Sasha Stone@realsashastone·
Megyn is taking heat for saying something that is true. It might not be planned but it is sustained attacks on her for a long time now. We can debate ideas - when did it become about totally destroying someone? I'm not down with that. It's also not productive to change minds.
Megyn Kelly@megynkelly

@piersmorgan It’s a coordinated playbook. And it’s vile.

English
55
2
54
9.4K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Pres. Obama in his 2012 UN speech said “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed…” In other words: ‘it’s terrible that people criticize your religion. It’s just as bad as you desecrating a church.’ Wrong. Obama began a years long Leftist project of equating offensive speech with physical destruction and violence. The bomb throwers are no worse than the opinionated speaker. Remember Charlie Hebdo? Well, they insulted the prophet!! Those cartoons might as well be physical violence and they got violence in return!! Clear eyed believers in free speech and a civilized society must point out this equalizing which is done constantly and increasingly…by Obama then - and now, among others, by Mamdani.
English
0
0
0
609
Shabbos Kestenbaum
Shabbos Kestenbaum@ShabbosK·
Jake Lang has a right to free speech. Antisemitism, racism, sexism, is protected. Islamists Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi do NOT have a right to throw IEDs in the streets of NYC because their prophet was insulted. Someone please explain this to Zohran Mamdani.
English
278
1.3K
9K
179.8K
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
But you agree that it was Robinson, right? So what’s your point re “saw the truth” here?? Robinson- the furry boyfriend- was motivated by Israel? Or is it worse? Funded? Planned?? This is some Candace level stuff. I don’t know how much longer I can defend you. Juxtaposing against your stated belief…if you’re not implying what you appear to be implying then what on earth are you doing??? “Shark attacks — and ice cream sales — increase in the summer.” Those sinister ice cream trucks must want more shark attacks!!
English
0
0
8
534
Truman Scopes
Truman Scopes@scopesclassroom·
Who is calling you anti semitic? Most of the people you say are claiming that are doing no such thing. They are calling some of your guests anti semitic. They are suggesting that maybe there be greater pushback when it’s plainly obvious to all viewers but the host doesn’t notice. Maybe they are saying you are being used. But you don’t like criticism so you hear those critiques and say “ahh stop calling me anti semitic! You don’t like my criticism of Israel! Censor!!!” It’s because we have/had faith that you are good people and journalists that it’s been a shock that certain guests are invited and if they appear, they aren’t always proportionally critiqued by the host. Now, it’s your show. It’s your right to invite scoundrels — but it’s others’ right to call them scoundrels, criticize the invites, and/or not appear themselves. What’s the problem?
English
0
0
2
612
Piers Morgan
Piers Morgan@piersmorgan·
All these clowns were cheering me on when I supported Israel’s right to defend itself and asked pro-Palestinian guests if they condemned Hamas. But from the moment I started criticising the Israeli Govt’s excessive response, they branded me antisemitic and tried to cancel me.
Asher Fredman אשר פרדמן@fredman_a

I want to suggest that pro-Israel voices stop going on @piersmorgan, even though it’s good for likes. That will make it harder for him to make money platforming freaks like @AnaKasparian, @cenkuygur and @RealCandaceO. Nothing useful ever comes out of these screaming matches.

English
3.4K
2.8K
24.7K
1.8M