
tarun nanda
4.2K posts



If development means cutting down trees then someone explain China



Can a lawyer explain why it’s legally permissible for the Muslim mayor of London to join a bunch of Muslims in prayer in Trafalgar Square, instead of in a mosque, while one young Christian man is held to be breaking the law if he, alone, proclaims his faith in the street? If a lawyer sees this I’d like an informed opinion please.





If development means cutting down trees then someone explain China








India at #12 with just 9M tourists despite unmatched culture, history and diversity- this chart says it all. To unlock our true tourism potential: - Shift from “places” to immersive experiences - Simplify visas & boost air connectivity - Fix infrastructure & last-mile access - Market India like a global brand - Make our country clean




Phele bhagwan ne bhramaand banaya, fir dharti banai, fir aam ka ped lagaya, fir thailand banaya aur fir insaan banaya aur insaan ne avishkar kara mango sticky rice ka.














Too many are too polite to say this. But mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The adhan - which declares there is no god but allah and Muhammad is his messenger - is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. Perform these rituals in mosques if you wish. But they are not welcome in our public places and shared institutions. And given their explicit repudiation of Christianity they certainly do not belong in our churches and cathedrals. I am not suggesting everybody at Trafalgar Square last night is an Islamist. But the domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook. Trafalgar Square belongs to all of us. It is a national memorial to our independence and our salvation. Last night was not like a televised football match or a St Patrick’s Day celebration. It was an act of domination and therefore division. It shouldn’t happen again.






