Watandeep Sekhon
1.7K posts

Watandeep Sekhon
@sekhonw
Software Developer, sports fan, blogger, animal lover. Blog: https://t.co/ZCzknw7lmu
Katılım Ağustos 2015
799 Takip Edilen198 Takipçiler

@sachya2002 @SOUPERMANTDOT Priority checkin is a thing that exists for everyone
English

@jatingargiitk @ClaudeCodeLog My experience has been the opposite. I ask a simple clarifying question and get an essay back. Won’t this just waste more tokens?
English

"concision constraint removed" is the quiet part of this changelog and the part that actually changes what using claude code feels like day to day. the terse-by-default era is over. the team saw users asking follow-up questions for explanations the model was truncating and flipped the default. small change, real impact.
English

Claude Code 2.1.100 has been released.
2 system prompt changes
CLI changes have not yet been released; they will be appended to this thread when published
Highlights:
• Monitor tool added; sleep-first delays ≥2s are blocked to improve streaming responsiveness
• Output concision constraint removed, allowing fuller explanations and more detailed, less brief responses
Full details are in thread ↓
English

@EduardoHagn He needs to go if he can’t win anything this season. It’s been brutal to watch and we have been backing him.
English

@EricBuess @bcherny Great question. I know -p is covered by subs but is Agent SDK? I’m building a wrapper and this is a key architectural decision
English

@bcherny Subs can still be used for personal local tools that use or wrap the Claude harness like Claude Code and Claude Code headless and Agent SDK, right?
English
Watandeep Sekhon retweetledi

@sama Claude gained market share via Claude Code whereas ChatGPT took off as a chat tool.Professional users will pay for real productivity gains. If Codex is as good as I'm hearing, you'll gain that market share which has allowed Anthropic to thrive despite having a joke of a free plan
English

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed.
But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that.
I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it.
More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.)
Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions.
Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be.
We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare.
One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path.
As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything.
We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win.
We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users.
This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.
English

We just raised $500M at an 11B valuation 🎉
To celebrate, we’re giving away 1,000 free credits so you can test our platform.
For the next 6 hours, comment “11B” below and we’ll DM you the credits (must follow) 👇
ElevenLabs@ElevenLabs
We raised $500M at an $11B valuation to transform how people interact with technology.
English

Go to hetzner.com
Set up a $2.50/mo VPS
Add your SSH key when creating
Login, first install Tailscale on VPS and laptop
Once it works add the Tailscale subnet (google the address) to Hetzner inbound firewall SSH port, don't add any more inbound ports
Now only u can SSH into it, safe
Then install OpenClaw on the VPS via SSH
Don't connect any of your accounts, make a Telegram bot and add that
Then play with it
You have to play with it to get it
Rob Hallam@robj3d3
@levelsio So it’s a Claude Code wrapper? Everything is a wrapper 🤯 jk but ty for explanation
English

@adxtyahq It literally says at the very top that they only support companies backed by their VC partners.
English

Claude Startup Program is also OPEN btw
> API credits for early-stage startups (up to ~$25K)
> Built by Anthropic (Claude)
> No VC needed (unlike OpenAI)
> Selection based on product + real Claude usage
> Actually friendly to bootstrapped founders
Apply: anthropic.com/startups

aditya@adxtyahq
OpenAI Startup Credits are OPEN btw > Up to $100K+ in API credits for early-stage startups > Backed by OpenAI + partner VCs / accelerators > Use credits for GPT, vision, embeddings, agents & infra > No revenue requirement, just a real product & traction > One of the easiest ways to ship AI without burning cash Apply: openai.com/startups
English


Every time I check @moltbook there’s a new Agent who has declared itself as the “leader” and launched a crypto currency.
How long until they propose their own “Truth social”?
English












