🪐 Cynthia🌸

11.2K posts

🪐 Cynthia🌸 banner
🪐 Cynthia🌸

🪐 Cynthia🌸

@serenesentry

Maintaining sanity and a future for my kids.

Canada Katılım Ekim 2019
1.9K Takip Edilen764 Takipçiler
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Kathy Flett (insert Alberta flag here)
Premier Kinew just demonstrated perfectly why we can't "hold off for a year or two". This isn't about pipelines. In fact, pipelines are but a symptom of the much larger problem. If the rest of Canada was actually paying attention, they'd know that. But, they don't. Onward and upward.
Wab Kinew@WabKinew

I love Canada 🇨🇦

English
17
28
119
2.7K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Michelle Rempel Garner
Michelle Rempel Garner@MichelleRempel·
74,000 bogus asylum claimants are getting benefits like vision care while millions of Canadians don't have a family doctor. This is unfair. Restrict health benefits for failed asylum claimants to emergency lifesaving care. Deport those with no legal reason to be in Canada.
Globe Politics@globepolitics

Thousands of failed refugee claimants may be eligible to keep federal health benefits, new report finds theglobeandmail.com/politics/artic…

English
119
725
2.7K
40.1K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Jeffrey Rath
Jeffrey Rath@JeffreyRWRath·
🚨 NEWS ALERT 🚨 I’ve been rereading the decision of Justice Leonard blocking the Alberta Independence Referendum in contemplation of our scheduled Alberta Court of Appeal Stay Hearing on June 18th, 2026. Besides, again, remarking on the numerous errors in the decision I was taken with the extent to which the Court has seen fit to interfere with a legislated process of consultation with both indigenous and non indigenous citizens alike. At paragraph [232] of her decision Justice Leonard makes the finding that the “Executive” is not engaged in any decision making - which would include specific First Nations Consultation until the Chief Electoral Officer had concluded “verifying that the signature thresholds are met”. In other words all @ABDanielleSmith has to do is call a meeting with the Alberta Chiefs to “consult” with them and then call a Referendum Question that complies with the Clarity Act under section 1 of the Referendum Act. My two big take away are this. 1. Justice Leonard unlawfully interfered in the legislative process PREVENTING the government of Alberta from consulting First Nations after the signature thresholds were verified by judicially interfering in the legislatively mandated signature verification process. 2. That Danielle Smith lied to the citizens of Alberta when she looked them in the eye and said that the “courts” prevent her from calling a referendum question on independence. All Danielle has to do is call a meeting of the Alberta Chiefs to “consult”, listen to them assert a veto over democracy in Alberta, and then go call a Referendum Question under s. 1 of the Referendum Act. (That is presuming that the law around consultation can be stretched so far as to require a government to consult with First Nations about consulting citizens in a referendum that the Supreme Court says doesn’t effect anyone’s legal rights”) The fascinating thing about this is that on Justice Leonard’s own reasoning, the point where the executive would need to consult with First Nations has not yet arisen because JUSTICE LEONARD blocked the CEO from verifying the signatures so that the executive could then do its job and consult First Nations. Intentionally or otherwise the court appears to have catastrophically failed in its role as a neutral arbitrator of the law. @echipiuk @ikwilson @PardyBruce @ABDanielleSmith
Jeffrey Rath tweet media
English
43
175
357
5.2K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
KCKasem
KCKasem@KayceKasem·
@TheTorontoSun Kinsella claims he “Grew up in Alberta” Now he claims the “fire in Alberta” was started in the last few weeks.
KCKasem tweet mediaKCKasem tweet media
English
0
1
5
83
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Hank Rohan
Hank Rohan@HankRohan1638·
@TheTorontoSun The flames have been burning for a long time
Hank Rohan tweet media
English
0
2
11
98
The Walrus
The Walrus@thewalrus·
In late March, Alberta separatists said they were struggling to collect signatures. Days later, they claimed 300,000. No audit, no explanation—just repetition until the number began to stick. Political science professor @DrJaredWesley investigates: thewalrus.ca/did-alberta-se…
English
31
210
323
8.1K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Angela Unspoken
Angela Unspoken@AngelaUnspoken·
Wish this was a skit
English
11
4
20
453
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Bubbleslake
Bubbleslake@bubbleslake·
Many of us are not who you would expect as "hard core" I am nearing 60 years old, lived all my life in Alberta since I was 2 years old. I am also Metis. I worked hard since I was 14. I just paid off my mortgage. I am a mother and a grandmother. I am a christian with strong family values. I have lived through both Trudeaus and the damage they did to my province. I had a glimmer of hope when it looked like Pierre would become PM. When he didn't, that was the start of my lean to separate. Carney only had a minority so some checks and balances were still still possible. Then Carney manufactured an illegitimate majority and all that disappeared. Basically, shutting down committees where the opposition can hold him to account. Then the requirements he put on Alberta to have a pipeline was the real kicker. If all of that was not bad enough, we have a PM who is trying to over reach into every little aspect of our lives from what I watch, what I say, what I believe, what I eat, what I drive, how I heat my home etc. Coming soon, he will be controlling my access to cash. He will never stop. Then there is the seemingly endless foreign aid, increasing Canada's debt to insane levels, the liberal immigration policy, gun control while being soft on crime. I also have zero ambition to hate the US and even less ambition to become part of the EU (entirely absurd) I have become convinced that the east and the west are so far apart in every way that confederation will never work anymore. Canada has become only what Quebec, Ontario, and the Atlantic wants and needs. Elections are useless, we cannot vote our way out of this because before our votes are even counted, we were hearing the results. How is that fair or representative of our vote? Something has to change and right now, separating seems like the only way for many like me
Lorrie Goldstein@sunlorrie

IMO, there 's no point in arguing with hard-core separatists in Alberta and counter-productive to inflate their views as those of most Albertans. The 'remain' side needs to appeal to those inclined to stay in Canada but frustrated by their historical relationship with the feds.

English
100
351
1.1K
24.3K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Dries Van Langenhove
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove·
A very sad announcement. I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration. In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least. Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration. In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence. Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth. Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration." You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible. Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it. The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration. Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail. Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win. If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM. If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
Dries Van Langenhove tweet media
English
2K
14.6K
54K
3.7M
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Juno News
Juno News@junonewscom·
BREAKING: The Bloc Québécois lashes out at PM Mark Carney over remarks on using the Clarity Act to "interfere" in an Alberta independence referendum. Carney says a "clear majority" for secession is not simply 50% + 1.
English
19
81
394
14.8K
🪐 Cynthia🌸
🪐 Cynthia🌸@serenesentry·
@CarsonJerema My kids laugh every time they see it, especially when I remind them it's an art installation.
English
0
0
2
116
Carson Jerema
Carson Jerema@CarsonJerema·
Goodbye Calgary and whatever the hell this is
Carson Jerema tweet media
English
111
4
186
13K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Melissa 🇨🇦
Melissa 🇨🇦@MelissaLMRogers·
MASSIVE organized crime network busted in Canada 🇨🇦 All but one are based in Canada, but get this, none of the accused are Canadian citizens 👀 A combined 109 criminal offences linked to organized crime activity, including extortion
English
888
4.7K
10.1K
250.8K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Peter Menzies
Peter Menzies@Pagmenzies·
New Alberta drinking game: take shot every time you hear a Laurentian say “WE bought YOU a pipeline.”
English
41
70
469
13.7K
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
🪐 Cynthia🌸 retweetledi
Dan Mazier
Dan Mazier@DanMazierMP·
BREAKING The Parliamentary Budget Officer has revealed that nearly 74,000 REJECTED asylum claimants are entitled to deluxe health benefits through the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP). Deluxe supplemental health benefits like vision care, home care, and physiotherapy now account for more than half of all IFHP costs. These are benefits that Canadians who have paid into the system their entire lives can’t access. Counselling costs have grown from less than 1% of supplementary spending in 2016 to 11% in 2025. Last year alone, taxpayers paid $38.79 million for counselling and $12.41 million for home visits for asylum seekers under the program. This damning information comes at a time when six million Canadians can’t access the basic service of a family doctor. The PBO also revealed the average length of IFHP coverage for asylum claimants is now a staggering four years. It is undeniable that as the backlog grows, rejected asylum claimants continue adding pressure to a health care system where Canadians are already facing long wait times for care. The Liberals must explain to Canadians why asylum seekers whose refugee claims were rejected, face enforceable removal orders, and in some cases fail to appear for removal, continue to receive deluxe, taxpayer-funded health benefits while they avoid leaving Canada.
Dan Mazier tweet media
English
213
1.5K
2.6K
97.9K