Shad

@jacksonhinklle u luv it dunt ya

🚀🇮🇶🇮🇷🇬🇧 WATCH: The moment of PRO-IRAN Iraqi militia strikes on the UK’s Castrol oil facilities in Erbil region of Iraq today

@IsolatedPlay_ We also tend to dominate posession which is a pretty big reason why

It’s pretty clear why this is the case

@thenewregion @RanjAlaaldin Bad footage to post from a kurds point of view

#BREAKING: Air defense systems activated in Erbil as a new round of attacks targets the city

@_jvd9 Very well explained. I also thought there was some significance to the wording, without a clear understanding of how.

When I was studying, I loved dissecting words, analyzing them critically, and that’s exactly what I really felt like doing here, so lets try. “So we met with the Syrian foreign minister and with the General Mazloum on behalf of the Kurds, a historic meeting together in the same meeting”. carries significant discursive and political weight that goes beyond a simple description of a diplomatic encounter. First, the statement must be understood in the broader context in which the United States actively resisted Turkish and Qatari efforts to prevent Mazloum Abdi and Elham Ahmad from participating in the 2026 Munich Security Conference. This already signals a repositioning in U.S. policy and a relative decline in earlier confidence in Jolani. Within this framework, it is significant that it was not Tom Barrack who attended the meeting, but rather Marco Rubio himself. The absence of Barrack and the presence of the Secretary of State can be interpreted as an institutional, political and discursive upgrading of the process. When an issue is moved from the level of a special envoy to that of the Secretary of State, it signals a re-centralization of decision-making authority and potentially an internal correction of previous handling. This can be understood as a rearticulation of hegemonic control by altering who speaks on behalf of the state, the symbolic structure within which the conflict is framed is also reshaped. It can also be read as a metacommunicative distancing from a line that has, in public discourse, been perceived as overly aligned with Turkish interests. This shift in representation performs a subtle dislocation of previous policy assumptions and reasserts U.S. ownership of the diplomatic framework. Second, the syntactic structure of the statement itself is discursively meaningful. The sentence constructs two parallel actors “the Syrian foreign minister” and “General Mazloum on behalf of the Kurds”. The conjunction “and” functions as a coordinating discursive operator that establishes structural equivalence between the two actors. They are positioned as distinct subject positions within the same diplomatic space. The phrase “on behalf of the Kurds” is particularly significant. It elevates Mazloum Abdi beyond the status of a military commander and performatively constitutes him as a political representative, and states that Mazloum Abdi speaks “on behalf of” the a population which is the Kurds, the utterance produces him as a legitimate spokesperson. Consequently, “the Kurds” are constructed as a distinct political entity with separate representation, rather than as a population automatically subsumed under the Syrian state. This constitutes a differential articulation, in which the Kurdish subject position is not fully absorbed into the nodal point “Syria” but instead appears as a partially autonomous political actor. (nodal point attempts to stabilize meaning within a network of concepts) Finally, the description of the meeting as “historic” adds a strong symbolic dimension. It frames the meeting as a break from normal diplomatic arrangements and suggests a moment of transformation. In doing so, it constructs the encounter as one in which two previously separated centers of power, the Syrian state and Kurdish political representation, occupy the same institutional space. Taken together, the statement does more than recount a diplomatic meeting. It performs a discursive repositioning in which the Kurds emerge not merely as an internal Syrian minority, but as a political actor with distinct representation in an international diplomatic arena. Simultaneously, the participation of the Secretary of State signals an elevation and possible recalibration of U.S. policy. The utterance thus operates as a political speech act that subtly restructures the symbolic order through which the Syrian conflict is understood. You’re welcome for the discourse analysis with a little help from Laclau and Mouffe, maybe @_Aram_Ahmed can add to this one.

Damascus forces have completely cut off water and electricity on Kurdish Kobane region as they are under complete besiege while clashes ongoing on southern and eastern fronts. At least 400K are deprived of water and power now.

Chalobah…

@CarefreeLewisG @CFCPys @kierangill_DM Barca is late November. If he's good by then so be it

@CFCPys @kierangill_DM Perfect run of fixtures for him to get a rest tbh. Get well soon

BREAKING; Cole Palmer has a strained groin and will be out for weeks, with November as the likeliest return. (@kierangill_DM) #CFC dailymail.co.uk/sport/football…

@CalcioNoContext @Nedao454 Switch sarri and de zerbi

@Bd_irB_ll Nuts

On the day they get rid of Jackson is crazy

@Artin0004 Poch before AVB? come on

@NotPaneen Idk what hes on about it was smooth

Mate

@Iewdawg We can’t uefa get anal after 3 overseas loans

loan otherwise sell to the bourg imo

@areen_abdulla Who is getting away with what

BRO HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

estevao, time for a new chapter.

19/05/12.

@areen_abdulla @Shangar_ Your goat could sacrifice his son and he still wont have as many chips as my goat

@Shangar_ @shadhoner i’d chuck you in there for fun man i dont even need a reason

i’d throw @shadhoner into a pool of battery acid if it means my goat winning his 5th chip

What a player Frank Lampard was.

@Artin0004 Good comp, great song, better player

@AndrewTurmer You really think Sancho not shooting were as per Marescas instructions? Even after he explicitly said he wants Sancho to shoot more?

Does Maresca know this is a must win game? His obsession with slowing everything down is insane. As is the instruction to not shoot. Sancho (5 times), Palmer, Cucurella and Jackson all refused to shoot inside the box. You can’t score if you don’t shoot! End this madness.

Rented out a Cinema in Iraq to watch the last episode to this masterpiece. Shout out Benjamin @BenStiller #severance