Sabitlenmiş Tweet
shinny20
305 posts
Good night to everyone who knows Kamala Harris would have destroyed America if she was installed.
Have a great week!
English
@SummerM40918655 @BaldingsWorld 是吗？华为创始人的女儿被美国的附属国囚禁几年，这是自由？美国给deepseek的梁发送邀请函几十次，梁不去，就上了美国的黑名单，你告诉我这是自由？那你来中国看看吧，你不来我会以为你被你的国家囚禁了
中文
@BaldingsWorld That’s may be why US will still win in the long run as it allows people to do what’s in their own best interest.
Communism doesn’t allow that at all. He may move back freely but I doubt he can leave China now without permission.
English
I worked for Peking University for a decade when China was loudly touting it desire to get more Chinese back to China. Let me tell you the dirty secret:
Almost none of the returning Chinese who I counted as friends said or indicated them returning to China had anything to do with geopolitics. A spouse. Simply returning back home. An aging parent. The vast majority of time people moved back to China had zero to do with global politics, US politics, and everything to do with just what they wanted to do in life. I'm very sorry to disappoint whatever narrative you have
signüll@signulll
kimi’s founder & ceo got his phd at cmu. why didn’t he stay in america?!
English
@DrewPavlou 被剥了头皮的印第安人才是被殖民的。八国联军抢了中国多少东西？你以为欧美博物馆里，中国古代的东西是白来的吗？都是趁着我们虚弱抢夺来的
中文
China basically did internal colonisation. To industrialise they relied on internal migration from hundreds of millions of rural villagers who were given no legal rights in the coastal factory cities.
Also the People’s Republic of China invaded Tibet and Central Asia in order to establish its borders along the borders of the old Qing Dynasty. Tibetans and Uyghurs were definitely occupied and colonised
Li Zexin 李泽欣@XH_Lee23
30 years later in Shanghai. In 30 years, China accomplished what took developed countries 100 years to do, without invading, colonizing and plundering.
English
WHY THE HELL AM I PAYING TAXES TO A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT:
>CANNOT DEFUND THE TALBAN
>CANNOT SECURE OUR ELECTIONS
>CANNOT BALANCE A BUDGET
>CANNOT READ THE BILLS THEY VOTE ON
>CANNOT PASS TERM LIMITS
>CANNOT PASS DOGE CUTS
WHY ARE WE PAYING TAXES?!!!!!!
English
It's becoming clearer and clearer that China's AI open source strategy may end up being seen as one of the greatest strategic masterstrokes of all time.
They started with a clear resource and technological disadvantage - mainly due to the US semiconductor export controls - and have managed to change the rules of engagement in such a way that the US's own tech leaders and officials are now publicly siding with China's approach against their own companies. Which is pretty extraordinary.
When you can't fight symmetrically, make the adversary's way of fighting obsolete and self-defeating.
And the greatest irony in all this is - had the US not done the export controls - there's a decent chance that not only China wouldn't have gone for the open-source approach but the US would have made an enormous amount of money selling compute to them.
Now they're getting neither the money nor the containment.
English
@SpeakerJohnson 是你这种资本家才怕吧？老百姓吃不上饭就是你们造成的，而不是别人。把你住的房子捐出来，政治现金捐出来，能解决不少人的就业问题
中文
The stakes couldn't be higher.
The question before Congress is whether we will preserve our constitutional republic OR chart a fundamentally different course that leads us down the ROAD TO COMMUNISM.
This is the question, and for Republicans, the FIGHT IS ON to preserve the greatest nation in history from Mini Mamdanis.
English
You have to be ignorant or evil to be a socialist.
Or both.
English
Now China’s Ministry of Commerce has stepped in.
That means this is no longer just a corporate dispute over British Steel.
It is a test case for whether Chinese companies can still trust Western investment treaties, property rights, and so-called “market rules.”
Britain cannot invite a Chinese company to rescue a collapsing industrial asset — pour money into it, upgrade equipment, protect jobs, pay taxes, and push its green transition — then seize control under the pretext of “national security.”
That is a warning to every Chinese company operating overseas:
your investment is welcome,
your technology is welcome,
your jobs and taxes are welcome—
until the host country decides your ownership is inconvenient.
If London wants to turn legal investment into political confiscation, then Beijing is right to make this a state-level issue.
Because if this precedent stands, no Chinese overseas asset is truly safe.
The British Museum is a warehouse of stolen goods.
Now British steel mills are becoming the 21st-century version.
The empire died.
The confiscation habit survived.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦@OopsGuess
Britain still thinks it is 1840. A Chinese private company bought a collapsing British steelmaker, poured money into it, upgraded equipment, protected jobs, paid taxes, and pushed its green transition. Then the UK government suddenly discovered “national security,” seized control, and moved toward nationalisation. Translation: when Chinese capital saves your industry, it is welcome. When the asset becomes valuable again, it becomes “strategic.” Very elegant. Very rules-based. Very empire-afterlife. The British Empire died. But the confiscation habit clearly survived.
English
@mokhanhim 那当然，中国现在的目标是世界大同，希望全世界人民平等交流，我们国内的社交媒体就是这样的，因为允许外国人注册，所以有一些外国网友，可以相互交流，一聊天发现，各国人都差不多的，差不多的生活，所以为什么不能互相好好说话呢，总敌视对方不太好
中文
We should have known what they were up to when they renamed it from the Department of Defense to the Department of War.
English
shinny20 retweetledi
Saying you’re worried about China interfering in our elections after you got paid over $300 million by an Israeli family is pretty hilarious. Israel has interfered in our politics more than all other countries combined.
English
@Gengi43 Without a doubt. Our rulers are terrified the American people will wake up and realize we’re being fleeced and deserve a better system.
English
China has lifted 800 million people out of poverty, has universal healthcare, the best modern infrastructure in the world, and accomplished all this under the Communist Party of China. This terrifies the US ruling class because it undermines capitalism and proves socialism works.
English
我并不觉得资本主义有什么不对，无论哪种制度，只要民众生活幸福就行，中国无意与任何国家为敌
Power to the People ☭🕊@ProudSocialist
China has lifted 800 million people out of poverty, has universal healthcare, the best modern infrastructure in the world, and accomplished all this under the Communist Party of China. This terrifies the US ruling class because it undermines capitalism and proves socialism works.
中文
So.. now that Americans are living in their cars and the billionaire oligarchs are sailing 500 ft yachts.. Blame communism, China, and Putin. But definitely NOT Congress, Wall Street, or their corporate puppet masters.
English
I have long said that the root of the bad life of Americans lies in the capitalists who control a lot of wealth. They are afraid that the people will realize this, so they will find someone else to take the blame.
Garland Nixon@TheGarlandNixon
So.. now that Americans are living in their cars and the billionaire oligarchs are sailing 500 ft yachts.. Blame communism, China, and Putin. But definitely NOT Congress, Wall Street, or their corporate puppet masters.
English
U.S. officials suspect China or Russia may be feeding Iran targeting data, after Tehran struck sensitive sites with unusual precision - WSJ
English
@SenRickScott @RepScottPerry 中国提供便宜的物品，让美国老百姓使用，你们却说中国破坏你们生活。你们封锁海峡，使很多地方物价高涨，你们这种资本家才是世界不太平的根源
中文
If CCP-linked tech firms are spying on and stealing the data of Americans, we need to know.
My bill with @RepScottPerry stops this from happening and PROTECTS Americans from COMMUNIST CHINA threatening our way of life.
Rep. Scott Perry@RepScottPerry
The “Blocking CCP Spy Tech Act of 2026” (H.R. 9687 - companion to S. 4586 / Sen. Rick Scott) compels the federal government to conduct a one-year National security investigation into 6 Chinese tech firms. If the review determines that the equipment/services pose risks to the U.S., the FCC will add them to its "Covered List” that prohibits their use/sale in the U.S.
English