Silky877

@LfcShaunjudge True, but after we finished at the bottom, and you won the title before spending half a billion, the next season making light work of you is a good result. Enjoy your day 👍🏻

Decade... That's how long it's take Man Utd to beat Liverpool twice in a season and they are acting like Arsenal fans like they won the league 😂😂

@HfitzHazel @SaulStaniforth And we know after he stabbed someone he knew he travelled a fair way not stabbing anyone else until he reached a densely populated Jewish area before stabbing random people in the street.

@silky877 @SaulStaniforth Says who? We have absolutely no idea of the motive of a person with a history of severe mental illness.

".. he's been charged with the attempted murder of two Jewish men and a Somali man earlier the same day" Why does Daniel Sandford report the nationality of the third victim rather than his religion?

@HfitzHazel @SaulStaniforth We don’t but the police likely do.

@LfcShaunjudge Fair play. We love banter between the clubs, but I’ve never agreed with the tragedy chants or wishing bad on each other. We take the piss but the respect is mutual which is why it’s such a fierce rivalry.

All banter aside.. Hope Sir Alex Ferguson is ok.. He was taken to hospital today feeling unwell ❤️

@AndyMk_83 I think give him a year contract and say to him. Now you are permanent coach let’s see what you can do. He won’t need a long massive contract so no need to give him one. Give him a year and see how he does. Feel sure he’ll be happy with that.

Dont think there's anything else to learn now for INEOS with Carrick. A decision should be made in the next few days and preparation to start straight away for next season. Whether it's him or not, make the decision. Personally, I think he deserves a two-year contract.

@FergieStandards It’s a yellow card, nothing more. But he was lucky the contact wasn’t worse or that the referees didn’t apply their ever more unpredictable logic to it. Right decision.

Call me bias but I don’t think that’s a red card. Bruno’s foot lands on the ground first and then slides into Szoboszlai’s at a low force, if it lands directly onto Szoboszlai’s foot then it’s a different story though

@RoryByr65355420 @bmc875 @chrismhowells The earlier stabbing, although sick and tragic, was for different motivations. Same horrific result but different circumstances I’m afraid. That’s why the media are talking about the other 2 more. You’re being deliberately obtuse.

@bmc875 @chrismhowells You "understand" wrong. These are Met officers. The Zio crowd are very keen on publicising the Jewish identities of victims number 2 & 3. Little attention has been paid to the 1st person he stabbed that day. I'm sure that's nothing to do with the fact that that man is Muslim.

Those officers should Instantly lose their jobs and pensions for this. Kicking a defenceless man in the head, several times, with steel toe cap boots on?? That’s Serious Assault for any other member of the public. There was no need for this whatsoever.

@NizMhani @BBCNews Because the 2 were stabbed for their religion but the other guy wasn’t.

Dear @BBCNews Why is it important to state the religion of 2 of the 3 victims of the stabbing attack in Golders Green (Jewish) but not the religion of the 3rd victim of that attack (Muslim)? Are some lives more important than others...?

@niyimuse When you’re big you’re big. I wonder how many other clubs finished towards the bottom then qualified for CL the next season…

Has the league ever posted a banner for Champions league qualification before this. Genuinely asking.

@AnnemarieDray Feel the loss of the record is pending. Sad times, and unforgivable!

This is ending one of two ways: a Bruno assist for the winner or a van Dijk header in added time.

@_AlanCurran I think you’ll find a car fault would take priority because you are putting many lives in danger if a vehicle wasn’t in a suitable condition. Policy states there is never an excuse to drive a vehicle in poor condition.

@silky877 Nope; because there are other superseding requirements when working in the office of constable, such as preservation of life. That’s exactly why they teach you the national decision making model. So you know when doing something is justifiable despite policy or law.

This is 100% NOT common practice. This is, at its core, shadow IT use against policy. But even worse, it morally wrong. If you need to take photos for evidence purposes, you should be provided with the equipment to do so. Or call out those who do (Scene of crime team).

@_AlanCurran A breach of policy never the less.

@silky877 And I did check vehicles at the start of a shift before I’d drive them, and fill in the log book, and check the equipment. If I didn’t, I could justify it (responding to a life and death call at the start of a shift which took priority). I’m fine with defending that based on risk

@_AlanCurran Policy is you are not to move on to the next job until you have finished the one in hand. That’s policy. As is driving a vehicle without a proper and full inspection whatever is required. You didn’t know policy well enough🤷🏻‍♂️

@silky877 I’m not sure what you’re getting at, that’s never been a thing. Prioritisation is always based on risk, harm and urgency, not admin completion. Struggling to follow your logic here.

@_AlanCurran Well you weren’t very productive then. Going to a call then finishing all of the paperwork and crime report etc before even contemplating another job. Or by ignoring an outstanding emergency call because you are completing a full and thorough inspection of the car. Good for you!

@silky877 One of the many reasons I left. Having to work with people who broke the rules, which it sounds like you’re doing. You can do the job properly and legally, or you can take shortcuts. I chose to do it properly.

@_AlanCurran You clearly didn’t know the policies as well as you should have then. Working to rule is something police could do instead of industrial action because by its nature it would grind the wheel to a halt. The policies are breached daily by almost everyone. Always will be.

@silky877 Believe what you want. Front line for over 12 years, and I’d happily say under oath I’ve never knowingly breached a policy or standard operating procedure. I’m actually shocked you are saying otherwise.

@_AlanCurran You were either not a front line police officer, or you are lying. But I’ll leave it at that. Have a good day 👍🏻

@silky877 You’d bet wrong.

@WasAcop @BettyBoochichi2 Let’s be honest, unless you worked to rule all your services you breached policy often to make the job work. That’s what this was, but of course some people do dumb sh*t.

@silky877 @BettyBoochichi2 That’s crazy… dam.. I’m shocked they even considered it..

Metropolitan Police officers used their personal phones to take evidence photos, including pictures of dead bodies, a misconduct hearing has heard. The internal Scotland Yard probe also heard that police routinely sent evidence pictures to each other on WhatsApp as a "workaround" to compress files before emailing and uploading them to the Met system. Police officers argued keeping photos on personal devices was "common practice" because work issued phones did not take good enough quality pictures. One officer was found to have kept a picture of dead bodies and showed colleagues "a bad one" at a training session. Police Constable Billy Manning was found to have kept a photo of a badly decomposed elderly man on his phone and showed the "bad one" to colleagues during a training session, making two of them feel "very uncomfortable", the hearing was told. His arrest and the subsequent investigation has revealed confusion - even within the force's senior leadership team - about whether officers should be allowed to use their personal phones for police work. The misconduct hearing heard that PC Manning and PC Zak Malik had been called to an old people's home in Dalston, east London in September 2021. The officers found a resident who had died "some days or weeks earlier" and whose body had reached a severe state of decomposition. PC Malik took a photo of the dead man on his personal phone before sending them to PC Manning on WhatsApp. He sent them to reduce the file size so it could be uploaded to the Met system and go to the coroner, the hearing was told. PC Manning deleted the photo from his iPhone library but did not delete it from his WhatsApp thread, the panel heard. When PC Malik realised the photo was still on WhatsApp and warned PC Manning, he replied with three laughing face emojis. At a taser training course the following year, PC Manning showed other officers the photo of the man who had died in the course of the conversation about "difficult situations". The panel heard he said: "I've been to a bad one, I will show you the picture." Two of the officers "felt very uncomfortable" and reported him to their seniors. PC Manning was arrested and his mobile was seized, with analysis of its content revealing a number of other pictures "relating to victims, suspects and evidence". He claimed it was "common practice". Another officer told the hearing he attended a separate sudden-death callout with PC Manning where photos had also been taken on personal phones, but he could not remember who took them. The investigation led to misconduct proceedings against PC Manning and the second officer, PC Frankie Jordan. PC Jordan told investigators he "did not believe that he had done anything wrong" and that "he and colleagues routinely took photos of evidence on their personal mobile phones and sent them to colleagues via WhatsApp". He said he and his colleagues had not been allocated work mobile phones and that the police issue tablets were "sub-standard". Criminal charges were not pursued, but the investigation led to misconduct proceedings against PC Manning and PC Jordan. After more officers came forward to report that they used their own devices, the senior leadership team met in February 2022, where it was decided that personal phones should never be used for a policing purpose. The Metropolitan Police was approached for comment. Link to the article: news.sky.com/story/common-p…

@WasAcop @BettyBoochichi2 People did daily. CID would ask officers to frequently. The met trialed an app to do just that but gave only a tiny minority access. It’s great you weren’t required to, and there should have been clearer guidelines and equipment provided. But alas there wasn’t.

@BettyBoochichi2 I’ve never taken a photo of any kind of evidence on my personal phone.. that’s what forensic’s are for… never mind dead bodies..