silversynth

"People believe anything that somebody puts in front of them." -Fauci

@JamesSurowiecki Your house burns down, you think it's an accident. Months later you find out your neighbor started the fire. Is your only question going to be "what difference does it make to the damage caused"? Is a prereq for working at the New Yorker to throw basic reasoning out the window?

How would knowing that Covid came from a lab - assuming for the sake of argument that it did, and that we could know that with certainty - have saved lives? What would have been different about our response?

@JudithM52103345 @delbigtree Like most you have been bamboozled. icandecide.org/wp-content/upl…

@delbigtree Hundreds of scientific research studies have been conducted. Kennedy doesn't like the answer so he wants another. And he wants a specific result. Have a feeling there's more to this story than your simplistic explanation.

Robert Kennedy Jr. wants to do the most basic thing science can do - compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children to unvaccinated children using the largest medical database in America. That's it. That's the study. That's the scientific method. And the American Academy of Pediatrics is suing him to stop it. Think about what that means. Not content with blocking changes to the vaccine schedule, they are now going to court to prevent an investigation into whether the schedule is actually producing healthy children. The one question the entire program should have been answering for fifty years, and the people who run that program are fighting in federal court to make sure it never gets asked. This is an industry protecting itself from its own data. I am not accusing anyone in medicine of malice. I am saying that the long-term health investigation has never been done with the seriousness it deserves, and now that someone is finally trying to do it, there is a worldwide effort to shut it down before it starts. We have to do this study. We have databases right now, like the Henry Ford Health database, that could give us real answers. Every database in this country should be opened to this investigation. The scientific method demands it. The health of our children demands it. The only people who have something to fear from the truth are the ones fighting this hard to hide from it. AnInconvenientStudy.com

@BaldEagle1964 @delbigtree Yes. Despite the name, it's a trade organization. The health of children is way down on their list of priorities.

@delbigtree Is the American Academy of Pediatrics being run by big pharma?

@Boldtruth11 @delbigtree There have been small scale studies: Dr. Paul Thomas on the patients in his practice, Mawson, Hooker, Henry Ford Zervos etc... They all show the vaccinated are much less healthy and all call for more studies to be done on larger databases. Which is what RFKJ is trying to do here.

@delbigtree Wasn't that done a few years back during Covid. I remember a presentation done at a conference by a doctor who looked across thousands of adults and found that all the comorbidities were in those who had been vaccinated as children. Anyone remember it?

@delbigtree No placebos in pre-licensure trials. Total garbage post-marketing monitoring systems like VAERS. And now AAP wants to prevent vaxxed/unvaxxed studies. It's almost as if they don't want to know the harm that vaccines are causing to our children. Tobacco science playbook.

@KathleenCU41146 @delbigtree You are completely uninformed. icandecide.org/wp-content/upl…

@delbigtree Because these studies have been conducted since the advent of vaccines. There are ongoing studies, every single year, year after year, backed by science. RFK Jr is running a “make work” project to further his uneducated healthcare opinions.

The DOJ's deadline to charge Fauci for lying under oath about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan is in 6 days. We can’t allow the statute of limitations to run out. He MUST be charged! Agree? RT.

@photek 30 years later and still sounds like the future... And nobody has figured out how to make beats like that since.

Aleph 1 2026 re-record test - shaping up nicely! Drums are a little more snappy now. I’ll probably fade the drums in like I did on the original.

@Charlie156214 @PeterSchiff Anyone who bought mining shares in 2024 has done spectacularly well. Since Jan 1 2024: GDX +191% GDXJ +202% SIL +207% SILJ +187% EPGIX +126% Why comment when you have no idea what you're talking about?

@PeterSchiff In your Friday wrap up, you mentioned gold mining stocks once. You said they were down and moved on. You finished your show by telling people to buy gold and silver from Schiff Gold. Have you forgotten that you told everyone to buy mining stocks in 2024 and have done poorly?

The yield on 30-year Treasuries is above 5%, nearing the highest yield in twenty years. The move from 5% to 6% will be much quicker than the move from 4% to 5%, and the move from 6% to 7% will be quicker still. Given our sky-high debt, this move will trigger an economic crisis.

@photek Wow that's some serious cash for samples, especially back then! Well worth it though.

@silvermonosynth Opening keys - I played them with the Emu E4 using a multisample of a Rhodes Stage 73. I bought a stack of floopy disks from a random geezer that had recorded every note at various velocities and prepped it for the Emu for £750. He even included the knock noise on key release.

Work in progress - drum test #1 The Hidden Camera 2026 (re-record)

@photek I remember analyzing MO (whole album) and it seemed like there was quite a boost around 3kHz. Teebee did the same on Black Science Labs, but then on his 2020 remaster seemed to pull eq back! Short term impact vs long term earstrain? Can't imagine Smoke Rings any other way though

It’s going to be better than the original..

@TorySnyc @delbigtree This attitude has to end. You are confused because we don't live in a technocracy where everything is decided by "qualified pros". If your car mechanic tries to sell you a new engine when you go in for an oil change, do you just accept it and pay because you're "unqualified"?

@delbigtree But you don’t know how to evaluate studies, so I’m confused as to why you’re making claims about appropriate study design. Unlike qualified professionals, you aren’t subject to ethical oversight, nor do you suffer consequences for suggesting studies that would cause child death.

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of @AaronSiriSG, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

@Dr_Z_Media @AaronSiriSG The CDC schedule was not based on science. It was based on money, injecting as many liability free vaccines into children as possible. "Outbreaks" of measles and whooping cough are nothing compared to 1 in 31 kids with autism (about 30% non-verbal). Educate yourself.

The 2024 and prior CDC schedule is best for all children and public health at large. Anyone listening to RFK and Siri are putting your children’s health at unnecessary risk which is why we are seeing outbreaks of measles and whooping cough. Universal recommendations is good public health policy.

Wow. A New York Time’s article that introduces me without smears and ad hominem: “The new [CDC ACIP] charter places a heavy emphasis on vaccine safety and includes ‘recovery from serious vaccine injuries’ as among the types of expertise that would qualify someone to be a committee member. The document appears to draw from a petition to the health secretary by Aaron Siri, a lawyer who for years joined with Mr. Kennedy in court battles over vaccine safety. In the petition, Mr. Siri asked the health secretary to reframe the committee’s charter and to nominate at least two members who ‘have direct and substantial experience advocating for and/or treating those injured by vaccines.’ In a separate petition, Mr. Siri has also asked the acting head of the C.D.C. to … recommend that Americans decide whether to receive the shots in consultation with a health care provider, instead of saying that all Americans should get them. ... ‘This change is an important step toward assuring individualized care for each child rather than vaccinating children like cattle,’ Mr. Siri said in an emailed statement. ‘To be clear, that should be the case for all vaccines, but it should, at the very least, be the case for the ones that do not prevent infection and transmission.’ But experts in infectious diseases said they disagreed…” nytimes.com/2026/04/09/hea…

@JasonSm32486931 @AaronSiriSG @ICANdecide He has and they are being done.

@AaronSiriSG @ICANdecide Why hasnt your buddy RFK who controls a 900 billion dollar budget, authorized new vaccine research trials? There have been ZERO new vaccine trials since he took office.

On behalf of @ICANdecide, we just sent a copy of chapter 11 of Vaccines, Amen to the entire new federal autism committee. If you haven't already read this chapter, you can read the whole thing in the attached letter. I trust that after you read it, you'll see why the statement "vaccines do not cause autism" is a belief, not science! icandecide.org/press-release/…

@thereal_truther @AaronSiriSG @ICANdecide The large scale studies that would establish a link have not been done. Newsflash it's up to HHS with billions in taxpayer funds to do the proper studies. Not the vaccine injured. With meager resources people like Thomas, Mawson and Hooker have done small studies that show harm.

@AaronSiriSG @ICANdecide Do you have any evidence vaccines DO cause autism? No substacks, blogs, videos, Rumble links, for-profit propaganda books, retracted "studies", surveys or hopelessly confounded studies. I'll wait.

🚨AARON SIRI: "Not a SINGLE routine injected childhood vaccine was licensed based on a placebo controlled trial." "Most drugs are licensed based on multi year placebo controlled trials. In contrast, for MOST childhood vaccines... it's often days or weeks of safety review." @AaronSiriSG

@Robby1614 @ChildrensHD Aaron Siri's ACIP presentation is here: cdc.gov/acip/downloads…

@Robby1614 @ChildrensHD No, novel vaccines do not go through inert placebo trials in pre-licensure. This is just a lie propagated by Big Pharma after they got caught lying about placebos in the 1st place. Siri went through all the vaccines on the schedule and their history of safety trials.

🚨 Aaron Siri reveals a startling fact to Joe Rogan: Almost no childhood vaccines have ever been tested against a true placebo. “For most childhood vaccines, instead of years, it’s often days or weeks of safety review in the clinical trial allowed upon to license them.” “Not a single—and I know that folks contest this all the time, but it’s in the FDA literature—not a single routine injected childhood vaccine was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial.” @joerogan @AaronSiriSG