Nathan Simons

They thought it was appropriate to continue practicing the Law of Moses even after the law had been fulfilled in Christ’s atonement. Paul told them to stop practicing circumcision. (Which is actually a covenant with Abraham not Moses.) That the new covenant with Christ is entered through baptism. You might need to get specific with your questions. I’m stabbing in the dark here.

@simonsnathank @farmingandJesus Cool, then you'll be the first to continue the conversation! What was the issue with the Judaizers ?

Oh that’s easy. Galatians 1:8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.

@somethinghere87 @farmingandJesus They get probably get bored

@simonsnathank @farmingandJesus You know what's funny? I've asked dozens of Mormons the question about the Judaizers in Galatians and they ALL have disappeared. Why do you think that is?

@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Did you not like this question?

@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Does the Son have true aseity?

@MidwesternSaint @_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus In fact the early church fathers were all subordinations.

@_fbhm @simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus Where does the Bible say they share identical authority? It seems pretty clear to me that the Son is subordinate to the Father.

@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus “In the name of” means acting in the authority of. Why does it not say “ in the name of the triune god, 3 person existing in one consubstantial being”? That would make things clear.

@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus What does the word “name” in that verse mean to you?

@_fbhm @MidwesternSaint @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus Providing evidence of 3 person existing in a singular consubstantial being would be necessary to prove the triune God.

@MidwesternSaint @simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus Run back to your cage you cowardly dog

@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus That teaches that they are 3 persons that are homoousios in one being? I don’t see it.

@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Matthew 28:18-20 wherein Jesus commands the disciples for baptize in the name (singular) of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. See how I was able to very easily and straightforwardly answer your question? Try it out sometime!

@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Yes, now where are you getting triune God? I don’t find that in the bible.

@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Gospel just means good news, my definition of the Gospel is the four books Matthew, Mark, Luke and John which account for Jesus’ life, ministry, death for our salvation and resurrection defeating death. If your definition is in line with that then by all means make your point

@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus Are you going to show us the consubstantial triune god in the biblical texts? 🤣 you would be the first and only person to ever do it.

@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus So you concede that my Bible contains the true Gospel? What a surprise! I’m glad you can accept the true Triune God of the Bible, three in persons and one in being! I’m glad you can accept that the Father was never man and that we men will never become gods!

@_fbhm @hawiaancovefe @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus Are you assuming an in infallible inerrant Bible?

@hawiaancovefe @simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @farmingandJesus He seems to believe that: A) the Bible we have was corrupted and a corrected version was written by Joseph Smith and B) the Bible we have and the book(s) he has are both the same Gospel What an absolutely clownish religion, it only stands on falsehood and comfort

@_fbhm @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus What did he correct about the gospel? The life, death, burial and resurrection of Christ? That is the gospel according to Paul. Do you have a different definition of the gospel?

@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @farmingandJesus If it’s the same Gospel, then why did Joseph Smith have to correct it? You’re betraying your own empty and false religion because you are humiliated by it, you desperately cling on to the coattails of Christianity for a shred of legitimacy because you know your prophet is a liar

@MidwesternSaint @Saengsouriyan @_fbhm @farmingandJesus 🤣

@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @_fbhm @farmingandJesus Bro they just keep on insisting. It's actually crazy to be that they're not able to comprehend a different point of view. They actually think it's gotta be our kryptonite or something just because their pastor and/or people on X told them it is.

@Saengsouriyan @MidwesternSaint @_fbhm @farmingandJesus Why? We have the same gospel but you don’t have priesthood authority.

@MidwesternSaint @_fbhm @simonsnathank @farmingandJesus You don’t refute Galatians 1:8? Great! You should go get rebaptized and join an actual Christian denomination

@Saengsouriyan @hawiaancovefe @_fbhm @farmingandJesus Don’t jump ahead. Do you agree with my interpretation?

@simonsnathank @hawiaancovefe @_fbhm @farmingandJesus The Gospel taught again? What reason would there be for the gospel to be taught again if it’s the same gospel.

@MidwesternSaint @Saengsouriyan @_fbhm @farmingandJesus I can’t understand their argument. We don’t believe we have a different gospel from Paul’s teachings. Maybe I’m too stupid to understand.🤣

@Saengsouriyan @_fbhm @simonsnathank @farmingandJesus I don't need to refute Galatians 1:8, it's entirely consistent with my world view and beliefs. I've explained why it's not an issue for what I believe in the slightest. I don't know what more you want from me.

Paul is saying. I’ve taught you the gospel of Jesus Christ. So, even if an angel preaches a different gospel, it is not of God. Which is correct, anything contrary to the good news of Christ is not from God. Do you think that means the gospel can’t be taught again? I don’t understand your argument.

@simonsnathank @hawiaancovefe @_fbhm @farmingandJesus I told you exactly what Paul said, you said my interpretation is shit. Answer my question so I can understand YOUR interpretation

@Saengsouriyan @hawiaancovefe @_fbhm @farmingandJesus No no no. What is Paul saying? Let’s start with that.

@simonsnathank @hawiaancovefe @_fbhm @farmingandJesus Ok, how would you interpret it to allow for another revelation or restoration 1800 years later by Joseph Smith

@hawiaancovefe @Saengsouriyan @_fbhm @farmingandJesus You have not

@simonsnathank @Saengsouriyan @_fbhm @farmingandJesus I literally just did. you're literally responding to me doing exactly that. and you say I have reading comprehension issues. 💀