ASPI Vanguard
862 posts

ASPI Vanguard
@sjletsgo
$ASPI Soldier - Long live the isotopes ☢️
Katılım Eylül 2016
52 Takip Edilen184 Takipçiler

@Jaro_rogue @markcboon Yo ass ain’t been commenting on it for millennia anyway 🤣🤣
English

All shall rise! In honour of the might isotopes …!
Mama said they’d be days like this ☢️ 🤍
#ASPI
English

@Darky999 @CryptoOwly @piterloskot82 But your point is largely around semantics of ownership. Who really cares. The point Piotr is making is their ownership as an entity through their funds is growing suggesting portfolio managers are buying more shares during the dip days. Bullish to me brodi
English

Of course I know that, but so what if Blackrock votes on behalf of their clients?
That means very little, it’s basically irrelevant.
Fact remains, Blaclrock didn’t use any of its own capital to by the shares, it was all bought using client’s capital.
I am very long $ASPI, have been for years…
This “blackrock owns 6%” argument is just misleading and silly
English

@Darky999 @CryptoOwly @piterloskot82 Haha only messing you’re not dopey. If you’re long ASPI you my brother in arms and isotopes. But to your point - I’m not sure what I’m arguing about here haha. I think the significance of BR being larger shareholders is that fund managers clearly are increasing exposure within BR
English

@DudeWhoInvests Wow what a scenic trail - Elon must have his barefoot shoes on for this trail that he’s on 🤣
English

@CryptoOwly @Darky999 @piterloskot82 Tell em louder Owly my brother - the dopey doctor doesn’t know that blackrock exercise their voting rights through Blackrock Invetsment Stewardship on BEHALF of their clients. So the ownership in returns is distributed but the voting is centralised thru them
English

This is an insanely boring chat. Anyway... the investor owns shares in the looked investment vehicle aka the fund. The investment fund company owns the underlying portfolio companies. So whilst the underlying investor is the beneficial owner, the fund owns the actual legal rights. That's usually how it works.
English

@UDiamondBalls Not familiar with technical analysis specifics mate can you explain the price/volume pattern that you’re suggesting is being setup?
Hope you right! #ASPI
English

@Mindwalletbody I respect you because you ask the hard questions no one else wants to ask or feels worried/ concerned. Legit concerns but if the progress they have reported is true, they are edging closer. This would be the spanner in the works thought that only execution uncovers.
English

@hhhhpqhhhh ハハハ、君は速い生活が好きなんだね、友よ!僕たちは同じような人間だ…でも、忍耐があればきっと僕たちは目指す場所にたどり着けると確信しているよ。
日本語

@sjletsgo 3年も飛ばず鳴かずだったら
つまらなすぎてTwitter更新止まりますね😇
それならむしろ暴落でもいいです🫠
日本語

@Kappaemme1926 stay strong out there bro - i deleted claude subscription yesterday after joining codex last week.. got the 5x subscription and non stop prompting barely makes a dent
English

Said “hello” on Claude.
Lost ~2% of the session.
One message.
That’s it.
That was the $20 plan.
You couldn’t build anything serious with it.
Now it’s gone… and it’s starting to feel like a tool for high spenders only.
Meanwhile, Codex just works.
The more I use it, the more Claude feels capped.
Killing the $20 plan?
That just made the choice easier.
English

I don't know what they are doing over there, but Codex will continue to be available both in the FREE and PLUS ($20) plans. We have the compute and efficient models to support it. For important changes, we will engage with the community well ahead of making them.
Transparency and trust are two principles we will not break, even if it means momentarily earning less. A reminder that you vote with your subscription for the values you want to see in this world.
Amol Avasare@TheAmolAvasare
For clarity, we're running a small test on ~2% of new prosumer signups. Existing Pro and Max subscribers aren't affected.
English















