SilverLiningInitiative

30.2K posts

SilverLiningInitiative banner
SilverLiningInitiative

SilverLiningInitiative

@slvrlnginit

Propeople person 🩵 Interested in ways to help others regardless of politics. Nature enthusiast☀️Gratitude 💫

Georgia Voter 🍑 Katılım Ekim 2016
15.5K Takip Edilen14.2K Takipçiler
SilverLiningInitiative retweetledi
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
Researchers have found that spending about two hours a day in quiet environments may lead to physical changes in the brain, including the formation of new nerve cells. Daily life is filled with constant sound, but evidence suggests that silence itself plays an important biological role. Experiments show that prolonged quiet, especially around two hours, stimulates neurogenesis in the hippocampus, a brain region involved in memory, learning, and spatial awareness. Rather than simply offering relaxation, silence appears to actively support brain renewal. Noise keeps the nervous system in a heightened state of readiness. In contrast, silence allows the brain to settle, creating conditions that support repair and internal processing. With fewer external signals to manage, neural networks may strengthen, and new cells are more likely to survive and integrate. This challenges the idea that the brain only benefits from stimulation, highlighting that meaningful neurological growth can also occur during deep stillness. Source: Kirste, L., Zaba, Z., Wang, S., Herrmann, T., & Kempermann, G. Is silence golden? Effects of auditory stimuli and their absence on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Brain Structure and Function.
Science girl tweet media
English
76
226
988
58.7K
SilverLiningInitiative retweetledi
Sukh Sroay
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy·
Ben Affleck just explained AI better than 99% of tech Twitter. I build with AI. I write a newsletter about it. I still couldn't frame it that cleanly. Sometimes the outsider sees what the insider can't.
English
79
413
3.1K
752K
SilverLiningInitiative retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Think in probabilities
Math Files@Math_files

Bayes’ theorem is probably the single most important thing any rational person can learn. So many of our debates and disagreements that we shout about are because we don’t understand Bayes’ theorem or how human rationality often works. Bayes’ theorem is named after the 18th-century Thomas Bayes, and essentially it’s a formula that asks: when you are presented with all of the evidence for something, how much should you believe it? Bayes’ theorem teaches us that our beliefs are not fixed; they are probabilities. Our beliefs change as we weigh new evidence against our assumptions, or our priors. In other words, we all carry certain ideas about how the world works, and new evidence can challenge them. For example, somebody might believe that smoking is safe, that stress causes mouth ulcers, or that human activity is unrelated to climate change. These are their priors, their starting points. They can be formed by our culture, our biases, or even incomplete information. Now imagine a new study comes along that challenges one of your priors. A single study might not carry enough weight to overturn your existing beliefs. But as studies accumulate, eventually the scales may tip. At some point, your prior will become less and less plausible. Bayes’ theorem argues that being rational is not about black and white. It’s not even about true or false. It’s about what is most reasonable based on the best available evidence. But for this to work, we need to be presented with as much high-quality data as possible. Without evidence—without belief-forming data—we are left only with our priors and biases. And those aren’t all that rational.

English
4.9K
10.6K
84.2K
25.4M
SilverLiningInitiative retweetledi
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸@AndrewYang·
If only someone could have seen this coming.
English
215
77
2.3K
752.9K
SilverLiningInitiative retweetledi
Barack Obama
Barack Obama@BarackObama·
Celebrated Valentine's Day with my forever dance partner. Love you, Miche!
Barack Obama tweet media
English
33.8K
66.5K
1.6M
63M
SilverLiningInitiative retweetledi
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Elon Musk just said saving for retirement becomes pointless in 10 to 20 years. Not speculation. Math. Musk: “Don’t worry about squirreling money away for retirement in like ten or 20 years. It won’t matter.” We passed the event horizon. Retirement savings assumes scarcity persists. It won’t. AI and robotics collapse labor costs to zero. Living costs follow. You’re not saving for security. You’re saving for a world that stops existing. Musk: “If any of the things that we’ve said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant.” Age of Abundance isn’t vision. It’s physics. Economic laws executing whether you believe them or not. 5,000 days. Fourteen years. Global GDP uncaps. Production approaches infinite. Net worth as concept dies. Only scarcity left is meaning. Money stops being the constraint. Timeline is shorter than your brain accepts. Fourteen years. We transition from survival work to Universal High Income in that window. Event horizon isn’t coming. You’re in it. Operating under old rules while ground disappears beneath you means you already lost. Production costs hit zero through automation. Everything priced on human labor reprices instantly. Housing. Food. Goods. Services. All reset when scarcity evaporates. Traditional planning assumes structure persists. Save for decades. Retire on capital returns in scarcity markets. That model shatters when abundance becomes baseline. You’re optimizing for a world vanishing while the replacement materializes. Your strategy becomes obsolete before you finish executing it. The retirement you’re building toward assumes costs stay high. They collapse. And your savings designed for expensive scarcity become irrelevant in cheap abundance. Every dollar you put away for future scarcity is a bet against the transformation already happening. And that bet loses the moment production costs hit zero and the economy you planned for stops functioning. You’re not preparing for the future. You’re clinging to a past that’s ending whether you accept it or not. And fourteen years from now, the question won’t be whether you saved enough. It’ll be why you wasted time saving for conditions that don’t exist anymore.
English
2.7K
1.6K
8.3K
3.7M
SilverLiningInitiative
SilverLiningInitiative@slvrlnginit·
@mcuban We should have access to health ins without having to go through an employer. That’s an outdated idea. I'd rather my employer not be involved in my health ins. Cobra is ridiculously expensive, when changing jobs. We need a large pool of Americans so actuaries can assess risk.
English
0
1
10
81
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Curious what healthcare geeks think about the idea of a short-term response to the ACA premium subsidies discussions: put $100 per month into an HSA that can only be used for a Direct Primary Care monthly subscription, and the balance of the expected subsidies to be used as originally planned for premiums. Having DPC should lower the plan's cost, which should allow premiums to be lowered rather than raised. Thoughts? What am I missing? @SenRonJohnson @SenBillCassidy @SenRickScott
English
487
102
772
315.6K
SilverLiningInitiative
SilverLiningInitiative@slvrlnginit·
@mcuban Most plans are already considered high deductible plans ($5,000+) with copays for primary care, specialists, and Rx. Would those copays go away?
English
0
0
0
13
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
What are your first thoughts on this home
Science girl tweet media
English
6.5K
573
7.7K
1.2M
SilverLiningInitiative retweetledi
Cosmic Stanza
Cosmic Stanza@CatsandDogsmem·
@sciencegirl i rather go for black-wood combo
English
34
29
470
20K
SilverLiningInitiative
SilverLiningInitiative@slvrlnginit·
Big Business like insurance companies are just as bad as Big Govt. Power in the Masses.
English
0
0
0
28
Speaker Mike Johnson
Speaker Mike Johnson@SpeakerJohnson·
Obamacare has become the Unaffordable Care Act.   Premiums have skyrocketed 60% since 2010 — yet Democrats want to keep subsidizing their broken system without any reforms.   The Working Families Tax Cut is proof that Republicans don’t just talk about lowering health care costs — we’re doing it and putting American families first.
English
4.6K
3.8K
16.3K
324.1K
SilverLiningInitiative
SilverLiningInitiative@slvrlnginit·
Ending the ACA subsidies. Will be the nail in the coffin. ⚰️
English
0
3
1
45
SilverLiningInitiative
SilverLiningInitiative@slvrlnginit·
When the $2,000 dividend has been long spent, and Obamacare is no longer an option, Americans will have to pay top dollar for their limited coverage plans, if they want coverage. Within a year, we will be cussing the Republicans. #bet #ACA #Obamacare
English
0
0
1
26