
snacks☃️🎄✨❄️
2.6K posts




There are no words.


Congress demands Dept of War release 46 secret UFO videos : 'You're gonna see some weird f-king s-t' trib.al/jFGTdrY




@EricRWeinstein "Hard conclusive evidence" is more difficult to get than people think. The evidence is subtle, and only rises in eminence after finding patterns that remain unresolved among all the prosaic things often mistaken for anomalous. You can see a plasma or flame quality in some clips.

(A) If the military had successfully reverse-engineered highly advanced alien technology, they would not still be relying on 1950s technology like the B-52 bomber. It seems to me that (A) is false. This seems to assume that the mere possession of a highly advanced technology immediately negates the utility of all older technology. But this is simply not how technology adoption, economics, or military logistics work in the real world. We already possess extremely advanced, highly classified aircraft right now (like the B-2 stealth bomber and the F-35). Yet, the B-52 is still flying. Why? Because dropping conventional payloads in uncontested airspace doesn't require risking a two-billion-dollar stealth jet. The B-52 is a cheap, reliable workhorse. Let's assume the military did reverse-engineer a UFO. Why on earth would they use it for routine patrols, basic bombing runs, or everyday transport? Deploying your ultimate, physics-defying trump card for standard military operations would instantly reveal your hand to global adversaries like China or Russia. You keep your most advanced technology completely hidden in black projects until an existential threat demands its use. Shermer's counterfactual fails because it ignores the variables of cost, risk, and strategic ambiguity. Possessing a trump card doesn't mean you play it on the very first hand.
















It was working fine, then melted. I will replace and hope it was rogue neutrinos.

Blew a hole in an esp32 ... Yikes 😬

















