Safety Not Surveillance

321 posts

Safety Not Surveillance banner
Safety Not Surveillance

Safety Not Surveillance

@snsmn_

A Minnesota coalition advocating for tech policies/practices that put communities first and promote digital civil rights.

Minnesota Katılım Temmuz 2020
614 Takip Edilen360 Takipçiler
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
🏃🏾‍♀️Come out to Mpls City Hall--if you can make it! ✨And a big thank you to 181 people who signed the petition!! ✨ We've sent it out to Mayor/Council. chng.it/GCWHpSHPMD
Safety Not Surveillance tweet media
English
0
2
2
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
We cannot stress enough how UNDEMOCRATIC this whole process is on Drones. Best next steps: 👇🏾 🤩 Council-- ADD more public hearings in evening (so real everyday people can join!) 🤩 Mayor/Alexander--GET MPD to come back to public after tmrw and listen/change/act on feedback
Safety Not Surveillance tweet media
English
1
2
6
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
4. natural or man-made disasters 5. threat assessment in anticipation of a specific event; 6. public area if there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity; 7. crash reconstruction purposes after a serious or deadly collision occurring on a public road;
English
1
0
1
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
How much power will MPD have with Drones??🤔 Justifications police can use to deploy drones👇🏾 1. emergency situation involves the risk of death/bodily 2. public event heightened risk to safety of participants or bystanders; 3. to counter the risk of a terrorist attack
English
1
0
3
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
@MstrBlstr Great Qs, so far we know: --7 day retention for footage/recordings. --No Facial Rec allowed. Could attached license plate readers and other AI tho. --police only notify you if you've been surveilled by drones if a search warrant is filed, info will be published later
English
0
0
0
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
🚨🗓️ 1 day before MPD Drone hearing!!!!🗓️🚨 Good Question to think about: --Will MPD brand drones??🤔 --How will I distinguish a drone owned by an aggressively obnoxious neighbor from a police drone? (...and what happens if one were to hurl a rock at it?hypothetically ofc)
Safety Not Surveillance tweet media
English
0
0
2
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
🚨🗓️ 2 days until MPD Drone hearing! "Drones don’t disappear once the initial justification for purchasing them no longer seems applicable. Police will invent ways to use their invasive toys" eff.org/deeplinks/2022…
English
0
0
4
0
Safety Not Surveillance retweetledi
masu
masu@malachitemist·
Police depts shouldn’t be shrouded in secrecy. Demand public oversight and transparency for ALL surveillance and military tech–Not just Drones! Sign Petition: chng.it/tCzMrSmNSr
masu tweet media
English
2
13
40
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
🚨🗓️ 3 days until MPD Drone hearing! Seeing comments about "Drones being needed to reduce crime"...Ok.. Then make MPD---define what crimes, why it will help, and strict protections against overreach.right now its all at their discretion. Blind trust is NOT good governance!
English
0
0
3
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
@MacPhisto17 @LineaPalmisano @ElliottForWard1 @cmlisagoodman @andreaforward8 @CMAndrewJohnson @MplsWard11 @JamalOsmanMN @JChavezMpls @jeremiah4north @MplsWard3 @LaTrishaVetaw @robin4mpls This is a silly point. We are not against using tech. We want a public approval process, w/ strict oversight and control. As you ideally should have in a working democracy. MPD is STILL under investigation. Only blind trust would make a rational person say this.
English
0
0
0
0
MacPhisto
MacPhisto@MacPhisto17·
@snsmn_ @LineaPalmisano @ElliottForWard1 @cmlisagoodman @andreaforward8 @CMAndrewJohnson @MplsWard11 @JamalOsmanMN @JChavezMpls @jeremiah4north @MplsWard3 @LaTrishaVetaw @robin4mpls Let me get this straight. First you dont want police to go after stolen cars or those involved with crime as it can hurt bystanders. Got it. But now using technology to catch these people while not causing other harms is also bad. Seems like you just want criminals to succeed.
English
1
0
0
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
Possible Police presentation to Council on 23rd. We've been talking with CMs--need them to ask questions like: ---drone make/model? Nº? ---fiscal note? $$? from where? ---More detailed Proposal? ---closing loopholes in limited use? ---No Misuse/discipline policy?
English
2
2
2
0
Safety Not Surveillance
Safety Not Surveillance@snsmn_·
🚨🗓️ 4 Days Until MPD Drone Hearing! Also--this whole process is UNDEMOCRATIC! Local government should be accessible to ALL. Council should add more hearings (in the evenings!). @Calex_law @mplsclerk @MayorFrey
Safety Not Surveillance tweet media
English
0
6
8
0