sparkymark

@higgyboson @IsabelOakeshott @DazC46164 @reformparty_uk It normally would an offence under Section 132 of the Highways Act 1980, and the rules of the Highway Authority, to put electoral material on highway land or furniture. I have no idea what law supersedes that that the filmer or Oakeshott is referring to.

@IsabelOakeshott @DazC46164 @reformparty_uk I think these two are total idiots, however..... It CAN be a criminal offence to install election posters in certain places. On a road sign in the middle of a roundabout COULD be one of those places. So this particular case is not the "gotcha" it may initially seem.

🛑 QUESTION: WHO are these little flowers? They are breaking the law by pulling down ⁦@reformparty_uk⁩ posters in the north west. Let’s make them famous…

Reform UK are surely in breach of s114A of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (undue influence) legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/2/p…

Can the @ElectoralCommUK confirm if you’re allowed to threaten voters into voting for your party?

Nigel Farage has committed prosecutable election offences with this video under the Representation of the People Act 1983. The Act prohibits inducing voters through the threat of “temporal injury”, which includes material disadvantage such as the targeted imposition of government burdens. Threatening to specifically house illegal migrants in a constituency if it does not vote Reform is coercive and constitutes a criminal offence.

And not a word on the front pages, and pretty much a news blackout on the broadcast media. We are getting into Reverse Pravda mode when it comes to the wrongdoing of @reformparty_uk … anyone would think the media was biased to the right !!!

Big up this legend. He's spitting straight facts.

@BoveFromAbove The Crypto Factor. Crackers, Jack. Blowing for Gold. The Price is Right. Racist across the world. Universally Challenged. The Shit List. The 1% Tax Club. Plastered, mind. Who wants to see a millionaire? Avoid avoid avoid? Runaground. I could go on ...

Name the game show?

Watching this gives the impression Trevor Phillips had had a quick snifter early in the morning. It's the only thing that explains the strange nature of his sing-song late night dinner table line of questioning and active misrepresentation of Polanski's position.

Laura Kuenssberg

Farage issues statement on why he 'changed his mind' about appearing on @bbclaurak this morning. #BBCLauraK #Farage #ReformUK

Well said @ZackPolanski on @bbclaurak - Social Justice IS climate justice! #BBCLauraK

"I said it's understandable that Nigel Farage decided not to go on the Laura Kuenssberg show. What did I say Roy?" "You said he's a cowardly little shit who only answers to his billionaire paymasters" #BBCLauraK

Hmmn. Nigel Farage avoids scrutiny, or even tummy tickling questions from Laura Kuenssberg, on his super dodgy financial affairs and Reform UKs dodgy candidates and council performance by ... simply not turning up. #bbclaurak

I CAN'T BREATHE 🤣🤣🤣

@reformexposed @ChrisWrightson6 It's so obviously fake - reverse image search even shows the original picture without the rosette - particularly given @JoannaLumleyUK comments on immigration and human rights. I hope she lawyers up cos a lot of people reposting it seem to believe it.

Reform UK spreading lies. @ChrisWrightson6 constantly puts out made up crap like this.

🚨BREAKING!!! 46 IPCC Scientists REBEL: The Climate Narrative is Crumbling from Within!🚨 Forty-six scientists tied to the IPCC have stepped away or spoken out because their evidence-based views clashed with the official alarmist script. They weren’t “listened to.” Their data didn’t fit the doom-and-gloom story pushed in the Summaries for Policymakers. Don’t trust me, read their own words here! ⬇️ Dr. Robert Balling: “The IPCC notes that ‘No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.’ This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.” Dr. John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.” Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.” Dr. Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.” Dr. Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.” Dr. Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 ‘scientists’ who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.” Dr. Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.” Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.” Dr. Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.” Dr. John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.” Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.” Yet the grift rolls on. New grads, indoctrinated in universities, keep repackaging the same scares for the next generation. “Consensus!” “The Science says!” Endless control through manufactured ignorance. Meanwhile, nature doesn’t care about the narrative. Natural forcings rule. The Sun is cooling. Jet stream gone meridional. Cosmic rays surging, seeding clouds. Result? Wild swings, then global cooling. The emperor has no clothes, and the scientists who know it are finally speaking up. 🔥 Original work from The Dragons Breathe Substack: open.substack.com/pub/thedragons…

Basildon Reform seems a bit suss.

Yesterday in Hastings, in the wake of antisemitic attacks in Golders Green, I faced Nazi salutes. Today the Prime Minister uses his office to attack the only Jewish party leader to score political points.

Who's funding Nigel Farage? Reform UK finances are under scrutiny after it was revealed an undeclared £5m was gifted in 2024, before he was standing as a Reform MP. @lewis_goodall explains what's going on

@Martina Your post is inflammatory and misleading. What basis do you have for claiming this about a legal case focused on the process and procedures of the OfS (Stock is not the focus of the ruling at all) and the bias introduced into those by the organisation?

What an insane and wrong ruling… while quoting free speech!!!!!! This will be overturned- not a question of if but when