Akshat

4.3K posts

Akshat banner
Akshat

Akshat

@star_stufff

theoretical physics

earth Katılım Kasım 2023
997 Takip Edilen2.9K Takipçiler
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
good morning to only inertial observers
English
0
0
1
3
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
@ayushphy Landau independently derived this equation
English
0
0
1
23
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
Have started working on my first QFT video btw, watch this space :)
English
6
0
77
2.2K
maya benowitz 🕰️
maya benowitz 🕰️@cosmicfibretion·
Here's a bright fucking idea: maybe if we didn't spend hundreds of billions of dollars on waging endless wars, physics would progress far faster?
English
97
19
260
12.4K
Gabriel Motter Jönk
Gabriel Motter Jönk@gabrielmjonk·
I think I found that one paper that will help me finish the last section of my paper on *an* electromagnetized (a test field here) Kerr BH.
GIF
English
1
0
5
192
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
@curiouswavefn If only he had not skipped those math classes at the Zurich Polytechnic
English
0
0
10
466
Ash Jogalekar
Ash Jogalekar@curiouswavefn·
Einstein did a simple thought experiment applying the equivalence principle to light in which he clearly demonstrated that the path of a light beam in an accelerated gravitational frame will be curved (this is demonstrated very nicely in Susskind's GR book). But after that came the hard part - figuring out the math that would describe this phenomenon. It took Marcel Grossmann's help with Riemannian geometry and tensors and Einstein's uncanny feel for invariants and general covariance that helped him achieve the end results after several painstaking attempts and dead ends.
RRice@drFoxcroft

@curiouswavefn Agreed. There was enough unexplained data to drive physics to SR. But not so GR. It was Einstein's decision to try to apply the principles he used in SR to broader cases that led to GR.

English
9
5
96
8.4K
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
When Hilbert space and Weyl tensor meet..
English
0
0
3
235
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
Extremely rare footage of David Hilbert and Hermann Weyl. Randomly popped on my YouTube feed. youtu.be/gVosjjoy1MI?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
3
25
118
5.7K
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
@TomuVoid hmm you have a point, but that would be 8 🤔
English
0
0
1
4
Void
Void@TomuVoid·
@star_stufff ok yes true but when he puts sunglasses on then how many
English
1
0
2
17
Void
Void@TomuVoid·
is gojo with glasses an 8 eyes or 12 eyes. DISCUSS
English
3
0
3
148
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
Absolutely, maybe we would have discovered it very late when particle physics was emerging. People like Feynman would have certainly described gravitational interaction in terms of graviton exchange. The geometric description really required someone like him with that solid imagination. The key was the equivalence principle throughout!
English
0
1
15
2.6K
Akshat retweetledi
Ash Jogalekar
Ash Jogalekar@curiouswavefn·
Dirac once said that special relativity would have been discovered very soon if Einstein had not done so, but general relativity would have taken a very long time (although Hilbert came close - he got much of the math right but lacked Einstein's profound physical intuition and thought experiments).
Akshat@star_stufff

Einstein submitted his paper “The Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity” to Annalen der Physik this week in 1916. It collected his work from throughout 1915, presenting the broader scientific community with a complete and coherent account of general relativity.

English
15
68
678
50.9K
Eric
Eric@stargazingdad·
I was 45 when I decided to take up physics as a hobby four years ago. It has since become my passion. Aside from work and family, most of my time is spent reading books and watching videos of varying difficulty. (learning math, too 🤪) I quickly realized just how little I know. Without the mathematical expertise, I’m missing the bigger picture. I’m doing everything I can to change that. It’s proven to be both very challenging and rewarding. I need to be humble enough to recognize my limits. I must acknowledge when my understanding is limited to my experience and skill set. That’s why I follow professionals like @martinmbauer and @NikoSarcevic. They don’t have to be here and engage, but I’m grateful they're doing it. They are kind enough to discuss physics so openly. Therefore, I am respectful and kind in my responses. That’s the whole point of science: working through problems together, collaborating, discussing, and figuring out the best way to find answers. We can only do that through respectful conversations. Professional physicists are my lifeline when I find myself in trouble. I know enough to get myself into trouble, but not nearly enough to get myself out of it, which is why I rely on physicists. A little humility, grace, and gratitude will go a long way.
Martin Bauer@martinmbauer

True, these people exist But the real revelation (at least to me) is the huge number of people seriously and deeply interested in physics. We‘re making a mistake by making University physics only really accessible to young students

English
4
3
105
7.1K
Akshat
Akshat@star_stufff·
@vrundasays_ It has to do with the geometrical structures on null hypersurfaces (such as black hole horizon). You might wanna check out Arjun Bagchi's papers
English
1
0
10
325
Vru
Vru@vrundasays_·
I've been coming across many papers regarding carrollian geometry recently 🤔 curious about reading this
English
3
0
15
992