Sterling Glover

@IsraelAnderson @LibertyLockPod @elonmusk I think people don’t click follow on x as much anymore. Reason being is x’s algos, they have you following the people you like by default without ever having to hit follow.

@LibertyLockPod @elonmusk I don't have a million views, I talk about very provocative and interesting theology though, yet my follower count has been stuck for a long time. Elsewhere it continues to grow. How's that possible?

My posts are seen on here about a million times per day. Not complaining. Very cool. And yet, so far this year, I've gained approximately zero new followers. Probably 100 mill views, no follows. It's not improbable. It's impossible. @elonmusk can you fix this? Please.

@IsraelAnderson @rustyrockets So many people are coming around to your videos. Thanks for the research and teaching truth!

Jesus -is- part of a pantheon, Russel, of course. Jesus is a member of the same royal family that built out the ancient world. The Elohim. Our Creators. The Bible isn't a monotheistic book. Abba Father, Yhwh and Jesus are all in this image. Do you know who is who? Hint: Jesus is the one on the right. You lifted yourself onto the first step. There are many more to go. Here's the next one... Two Gardens and a Snake - What Really Happened in the Garden of Eden? youtu.be/UoEorNACwmA

Why Russell rejected Jesus at first...

@IsraelAnderson These links have changed my whole outlook on God. You will learn something if you watch and the way you see the world will make much more sense.

I know you have a lot of questions - so do I. I don't have all the answers. I don't think anyone does. But I do have many answers. I have hundreds of hours of in-depth biblical studies and a growing number of written studies. Many of your questions will be answered there. Links below.

@kaizen000000000 @IsraelAnderson

That moment you apply logic and critical thinking to the Bible.😅🤦🏼‍♂️ Good thing about this caller is that you can hear him at least thinking about it... most don't even get that far.❤️

@IsraelAnderson @SoundwaveSpectr @JoshuaAtLarge Just read you study Israel. Amazing analysis that I’ve never seen

Well, it does. It's just that Christianity can't tell you about it, because Christianity is a lie to make Yhwh, God. Across three separate occasions – in the wilderness, in the Temple, and on a hillside – Jesus identified the god of the Old Testament by name. Not once. Not ambiguously. Three times, Jesus gave him a name. A different name each time. andersondiscoveries.com/s/jesus-said/ .

Some of y'all weirdos that have "Christian" in your bio would support bombing the return of Jesus if Trump said it had to be done. Full on sheeple. LOL SMDH

@IsraelAnderson You might be Neo

Christianity is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it. -Morpheus It's amazing how you can change one word, Matrix to Christianity, and it all still works perfectly. Enemies? Yes, but we love our enemies, like Jesus did.

@Ashleyhays2089 @kristalynnterry Nope

@kristalynnterry The land is meaningful and Christ will soon return and rule from it.

Doctrine of demons.

@UtesBcrazy @LDS_Liberty Proof

@LDS_Liberty Is this a joke? Even the LDS Church knows he has sex

@Microinteracti1 @TheDeadlypriest Fake you dumb ass. You got tricked by ai and wrote a novel on a fake piece of it 😂

@TheDeadlypriest yes

This video should unsettle anyone who takes the United States seriously as a nation. Because it exposes something dangerous: the trivialization of the world's most consequential office. It shows how carelessly the power, credibility, and accumulated moral authority of a superpower can be squandered for a few seconds of viral attention. In any other major democracy, this behavior from a head of state would trigger a constitutional crisis. Paris would burn. Berlin would convene emergency sessions. In the Nordic countries, resignation would follow within hours. Across functioning democracies, the public, institutions, and political class would recognize this for what it is: an assault on the dignity of the state itself. Leaders are not free to perform as entertainers without consequence. National honor is not personal property, it's held in trust. But the United States is not just another country with a provocateur in charge. It is the linchpin of global order. It maintains formal alliances and security guarantees with forty to fifty nations. It underwrites the financial architecture, trade systems, and diplomatic frameworks that billions of people depend on daily. When the American president speaks—or posts—it doesn't land as satire, meme, or personal whim. It reads as a signal about what the country is becoming. American power has never relied solely on carrier strike groups or economic output. It has rested on something more fragile and more valuable: trust. The belief that beneath domestic turbulence lies institutional seriousness, predictability, and a baseline commitment to dignity. That belief is now disintegrating in real time. Millions of American companies operate globally. They negotiate multibillion-dollar contracts in environments where reputation is currency. Boardrooms in Frankfurt, Singapore, and Dubai aren't debating whether a post was clever—they're asking whether the United States remains a reliable partner. Whether agreements signed today will be honored tomorrow. Whether American leadership has devolved from institutional to purely theatrical. Consider tourism, which sustains millions of American jobs—airlines, hotels, restaurants, museums, entire regional economies. Soft power isn't an abstraction. It materializes in flight bookings, conference locations, study-abroad programs, and decades of accumulated goodwill. A quiet, decentralized boycott doesn't require government action—only a collective sense that a nation no longer respects itself. Now picture this image being studied by foreign ministers, central bank governors, defense strategists, and sovereign wealth fund managers. Picture them asking a coldly rational question: How do we write binding thirty-year agreements with a country whose public face will be this, relentlessly, for years to come? How do we plan for the long term when the tone is impulsive, mocking, and unbound by the gravity of office? This is where the real calculus begins. Trillions in foreign capital depend on confidence that America is stable, credible, and rule-governed. That confidence is now being traded for what, exactly? Applause from an online mob? A dopamine rush from manufactured outrage? Content designed to dominate the news cycle rather than serve the national interest? Every serious nation eventually confronts this choice: burn long-term credibility for short-term spectacle, or safeguard the reputation previous generations bled to build. The United States spent eighty years constructing an image of reliability, restraint, and leadership under pressure. That image wasn't born from perfection—it came from a visible commitment to standards that transcended impulse. This isn't a partisan issue. Europeans who value democratic norms recognize something ominously familiar here. Americans—Democrat and Republican alike—who believe in responsibility and restraint should see it too. Power attracts scrutiny. Leadership demands discipline. A superpower cannot behave like a reality TV contestant without paying a price. The presidency is not a personal broadcast channel. It's a symbol carried on behalf of 330 million people and countless international partners who never voted but whose lives are shaped by American decisions anyway. Every post either reinforces or erodes the idea that America can be counted on when it matters most. So the question is no longer whether this is offensive. The question is whether this is who America chooses to be: a nation that trades a century of hard-won reputation for viral moments. A country that replaces statecraft with content creation. A republic governed like a season of reality television. History offers a harsh lesson here. Great powers don't fall because enemies mock them. They collapse when they begin mocking themselves—publicly, proudly, and without grasping the cost until it's far too late. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

@MMalagies Do a little bit of research about the DNA part. That’s been debunked.

I didn’t believe in God until I saw this

@PetGorilla @DanShaha The honest answer is it was taking back just like the golden plates

@DanShaha The honest answer is the Book of Mormon is fake.

@Eustach32919054 @JOKAQARMY1 Move to Alaska

@JOKAQARMY1 If the earth is flat, how can we sometimes see moon during the day, and we can never see Sun at night?

One of the best flat earth proofs 🤔

@IsraelAnderson @sometherapist This ☝🏻

@sometherapist We've been lied to. About everything. By Christianity, which is just different flavors of Roman Catholicism. Yhwh is not who Catholicism told us he was. I think you may be ready for this now... Jesus said: Yahweh is Satan the Devil, the Evil One: youtu.be/VDI5hf1S4rY

Genuine question for long time Christians. I'm studying the Old Testament. First I read an NLT study bible, then review + reflect in an ESV journal. I've read through Leviticus so far. So far, I've found at least 3 sins the God of the Old Testament would have had me killed for. Some when I was quite young. There's no age stipulation on punishment by death for disrespecting one's parents, for instance. To put it mildly, I'm having difficulty squaring the wrath of OT God with the mercy of His son Jesus. Frankly, I'm having a hard time liking this God. What to speak of loving or respecting Him. I'm also having difficulty understanding how an omnipotent ruler who governed through fear and intimidation, along the lines of the consequences we see for violating his commands in the OT, could simultaneously be seen as granting humans free will. I also have difficulty imagining how an intelligence brilliant enough to design our DNA and galaxy could be come across as so petty, ill-tempered, and insecure. Finally, when I read the brutality of the OT and then in the next breath see commentary on how merciful, patient, forgiving, and faithful God is, the juxtaposition not only gives me whiplash — it makes me feel somewhat gaslit. I know countless others have expressed similar sentiments. For what it's worth, mine is in earnest. I'm not an atheist trying to trap you. I am a new follower of Jesus Christ, wanting my faith to be authentic, sincere, grounded, thoughtful, and intellectually robust. I've asked several people for their thoughts on this. Not just online — the people next to me in church; the Christians across the aisle from me on the plane. I haven't heard a satisfactory, intuitive, or even intellectually coherent answer yet. I know these are all just people. None have perfect knowledge. But if you can point me in the direction of some truly enlightening commentary, I'd appreciate it. I've read some fantastic books in the apologetic genre, and listened to great podcasts, just none that have broached this subject yet. ***This is NOT an invitation for quarrelsome atheists or others hostile towards faith. It's specifically an invitation to fellow Christians whose motives are sincere and helpful. If that's not you, Reddit is down the hall and to the left. I'll mute or block any accounts that don't respect this request.***

@taco_talks @Brayden_Hurley1 Got Elohim part wrong. Mormon’s believe Jesus is the God of the Old Testament (Jehovah).

@Brayden_Hurley1 Glad you think it was an accurate representation

Conversation With A Mormon

@WyattCatarina @AntiLeftMemes That’s what true freedom looks like

@AntiLeftMemes Omg I love her 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@IsraelAnderson @TruthQ_4 @Styx666Official Didn’t wait long

@TruthQ_4 @Styx666Official Who is YHWH / Yahweh? youtu.be/JIMAqxGPR8Q

Proverbs 12:22 "Lying lips are an abomination to the LORD, but those who act faithfully are his delight." Respect your own religion. Mine says to drive your enemies before you and die with a sword in your hand.

@jonathanaplumb @grok is this true

@BookofMomma6 What about a mother daughter combo though like JS did?

I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, this person can enjoy whatever they want for their life. But I do think presentism is a huge problem when it comes to criticism of the church. Do I think it sounds gross to have a 57 year old marry a 15 year old? Yes. Also, check out this quote from an accredited genealogist. "I have a couple examples from my own ancestry as my father was a convert to the church. And literally just yesterday I actually did the arithmetic of the marriage of a couple of my great-great-grandparents who lived in northwest Pennsylvania. He was 21 and she was 14. So, I can add them to the 13 year-old who married a 28-33 year-old (depending on which record you look at) and the 16 year-old who married a 39 year-old of my ancestors. All three couples were non-Mormons." reddit.com/r/mormon/comme…

@bi02247255 @BookofMomma6 It’s because 25% of babies died. If you lived over 20 the life expectancy was 65 which isn’t a far cry from what it is today.

This will be a little long - I apologize. But you bring up good points that are worth expanding upon. 1. We shouldn't judge past generations by presentism. They should be evaluated by the laws, realities, and customs of their time, not ours. 2. In the mid 1800's, the US economy was still primarily agrarian - especially near the western frontier. In an agrarian society, large families are an economic asset - more hands to work the farm. 3. In 1850, average US life expectancy was 40. statista.com/statistics/104… 4. If you need to have a large family, and your life expectancy is 40, you need to start having children pretty early. Also recall that infant mortality was such that if you wanted to end up with 5-6 adults to help work the farm, you probably needed to have 8-10 pregnancies. 5. As late as 1880, the legal age of consent in the US was 10 years of age in most US states (including Illinois). In a handful of states it was 12 years of age. In Delaware it was 7 years of age. (Link below - scroll down to the US.) cyh.rrchnm.org/primary-source… Again, don't judge previous generations using presentism.