Steven Schafer

@Anaxogoras_ @figma i’m an optimist, what can I say. someone is thinking about this somewhere inside of @figma

@stevenschafer @figma If you’re dreaming about Figma reproducing flows in a repo, you’re drunk.

imo the dream @figma workflow would be to hand it a repo / folder and then its agents construct an entire spec based on the code itself. i'm designing in code mostly today, and then switching to figma when a spec is needed. this would be an insanely powerful workflow.

@scspeier @figma right! highly motivated to try and hack this via a plugin if they don’t build it soon

@stevenschafer @figma Been saying this x.com/scspeier/statu…

I mean flows. redlines are inferred through dev mode. An LLM would be great for mapping out each state, edge case, etc at least for the deterministic stuff. the most tedious part of my job is producing a spec in @figma. this feels even worse when I have a fully functional prototype already.

@stevenschafer @figma interesting. by spec you mean like full on redlines?

loving this yimby resurgence

@laura_waxee @Safeway @sfchronicle this pisses me off and i don't even live in the city anymore

Hundreds of #SanFrancisco Marina residents turned out this evening for townhall on controversial @Safeway housing plan, which would place what for many is an uncomfortably tall, 22 & 18 story project at the low-slung neighborhood’s waterfront. @sfchronicle

@LyalinDotCom vividly remember March 2023 pasting Swift code from GPT 3.5 back and forth into Xcode. Copying build errors back into Chat. Sometimes it would work and it felt like magic. We live in very fun times to be in Software.

You don't understand how easy modern models make it to build an iOS app. It's crazy easy.

i can't fucking sleep, this is way too fun

@laurenloprete give it 6 months and all staff+ design portfolios will have this aesthetic

@stevenschafer We can’t even design this good if we tried

design team at DMV cooked on this one

perfect — now launch voice mode on desktop

Bay Area landlords🔫🔫🔫

markets are insane. they want you to win but also dump on capex. you need capex to win. make it make sense

@elonmusk did you defund the DMV design team at a federal level

@alexandr_wang brother this is Flash 😭

gemini who? 🏎️💨

I'm sorry OpenAI but this is insane y'all. You gotta write a native macOS app.

@ryolu_ Beautifully said. I remember working on a stupid little skeuomorphic dropdown menu for a dribbble shot back in 2011. I spent well past 2 AM after class on every detail, perfecting the drop shadows, the carat, the stroke. Windows open playing John Maus. I found the key to life.

when the dream becomes the job i used to think the dream was to make my hobby my work. to spend my life close to the things i loved: computers, tools, interfaces, systems, tiny details, the feeling of making something from nothing. the things i used to do at night, after school, after work, in the margins of life, somehow became the center of my life. and it is a dream. i don’t want to pretend otherwise. there is a very specific happiness in getting paid to care. in meeting other people who care. in building a language around your obsession. in seeing something that lived only in your head become real enough for other people to touch. but there is also a quiet pain in it. because the thing that once belonged only to you no longer belongs only to you. it becomes attached to deadlines, teams, customers, strategy, money, reputation, momentum... curiosity becomes roadmap. taste becomes decision-making. play becomes output. the thing you once used to escape the world becomes the thing through which the world reaches you. and now there is another strange layer: the machines are getting good at the work too. not just the boring parts. the parts that used to feel close to the heart. writing, coding, designing, reasoning, making taste-like decisions, turning vague ideas into something real. the things we once used as proof that we had something special inside us are becoming things a model can approximate, remix, and sometimes do faster. that can feel scary in a very specific way. not only because of jobs or competition, but because it touches the myth you built around yourself. if the thing i became good at can be done by a machine, then what part of it was really me? i think that question is painful because it arrives at the same place. the original love. before the title, before the company, before the taste became a role, before the work became useful to other people, there was a small fire inside. curiosity. obsession. the feeling that the world became more alive when you understood a little more of it, or made a tiny piece of it bend to your will. AI can make the output faster. it can even raise the floor of the craft. but it cannot want on your behalf. it cannot decide what is worth loving. it cannot protect the strange private thread that made you care in the first place. maybe that is what becomes more important now. not whether you can still produce the artifact by hand. not whether you can outperform the machine at every task. that game is already changing. the real question is whether you still have a relationship with the source. the part with no audience. no roadmap. no deadline. the part that can wander, collect strange references, make useless things. follow beauty, be wrong, be slow, be you, be true. because that part is not separate from the work. it is the source of the work. if you lose it, you can still operate. you can still manage the machine. you can still prompt, review, decide, ship, and keep things moving. but the work becomes thinner. safer. more explainable. less alive. so maybe the real discipline is not to work harder, rest more, or care less. maybe it is to keep returning to the place where the love began – before it became useful, before it became legible, before anyone needed anything from it, before even the machine could mirror it back to you. not to escape the work. to make sure the fire inside is still alive.

@yakuzeg 💯

@stevenschafer yes, it's very hard to be actually creative when things move that fast inventing new things requires space for depth, if there is no space for depth, thinking and exploration, we just go for the "obvious" or "proven" solutions

looking at how much capital is going into every industry and seeing the homogeneous visuals we are coming up with... i cant comprehend how this can be real are we as designers so uncreative, is the speed destroying creativity, are we scared of taking risks or whats happening???