Andrew Grim

911 posts

Andrew Grim

Andrew Grim

@stopdropandrew

Katılım Nisan 2007
343 Takip Edilen109 Takipçiler
Andrew Grim
Andrew Grim@stopdropandrew·
@petergyang This guy breaks down what features matter and why, has specific recs too. Also by far the best maintenance videos @ocdevel?si=TQ5huW3l_L0ARazH" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@ocdevel?si=TQ…
English
0
0
0
129
Peter Yang
Peter Yang@petergyang·
I'm in the market for an under desk walking treadmill. Ideally something compact I can easily pack up. Will just use it for walking, not running. Any suggestions?
English
15
0
21
20.6K
SquaredCube
SquaredCube@SquaredCubeRBX·
THIS IS YOUR SIGN TO USE A/B TESTS ON ROBLOX!! this is the cheat code to 10k ccu i love whoever at roblox made this and the a/b testing for thumbnails
SquaredCube tweet media
English
6
6
133
11.4K
JR
JR@pdxbrocialite·
Quitting my job and getting my teaching license as a midlife crisis
English
1
0
2
291
JR
JR@pdxbrocialite·
Moda should definitely be renovated but creating a new arena in the burbs or the south waterfront that’s 40% club seating like Chase Center would be a travesty. And if the team ever left Portland people would straight up get Mangione’d.
English
2
1
46
848
JR
JR@pdxbrocialite·
Never rooted for a non-Blazer team more than this moment
English
4
2
45
2K
Andrew Grim retweetledi
JR
JR@pdxbrocialite·
I'm more worried about the Blazers moving to an arena in Tualatin than I am about them moving to Seattle
English
14
7
196
12.7K
Andrew Grim retweetledi
BURKOV
BURKOV@burkov·
To avoid misunderstandings, here's my stance on copyright issues in training and using LLMs. The basic premise: If you use copyright-protected data for your business, it must not be in conflict with the business in which the copyright holder is involved. Examples: - A copyright holder describes in their book how to work with a specific technology based on their decades of experience in the field. The LLM must not be trained on this book and provide this information to LLM users, bypassing the original. This can happen only when a licensing agreement is signed with the copyright owner and the creator is fairly rewarded on a per-use basis, similar to selling a copy of the book. - A copyright holder is an expert sharing their expertise online without charging for it, but the visitors of their website could then contact the expert for a paid service. The LLM must reference the expert and their service every time content based on their article is served to an LLM user. The fact that LLM technology cannot do that by design isn't an excuse to let it violate the basic premise. The technology must be improved to be fair to creators' interests and only then commercialized. What I consider fair use of copyrighted content: any other use in which the LLM users might benefit from the LLM's capabilities without copyright authors losing money, directly or indirectly. For example: - The copyrighted content is used to give the LLM conversational abilities that are then used for solving tasks the copyrighted content cannot be used for. For example, machine translation, paraphrasing/summarization of the original content provided by the user, searching for errors in a document, transformation from one format into another, or answering questions about information in the public domain, like Wikipedia or books in the public domain. - The copyrighted content is used to give the LLM abilities for downstream fine-tuning to solve business problems the documents in the training data are not concerned with. For example, fine-tuning an LLM to serve as a classifier based on business-specific taxonomy, or to output information in a business-specific JSON schema to be consumed by a machine. Or, fine-tuning it on a proprietary legal corpus to be used as a legal assistant when legal-domain books and other copyright-protected legal documents have been excluded from the pretraining dataset. The list of faire use cases can be expanded further, as long as it doesn't contradict the basic premise stated in the beginning.
English
22
12
116
14.4K
JR
JR@pdxbrocialite·
@CHold It’s all decaf
English
1
0
1
192
Andrew Grim
Andrew Grim@stopdropandrew·
@pdxbrocialite Scissors are the most under represented and often superior to a knife
English
0
0
1
21
JR
JR@pdxbrocialite·
Fork: overrated Spoon: underrated Knife: properly rated
English
7
2
11
0
Andrew Grim
Andrew Grim@stopdropandrew·
@johnhollinger Does a no look really count if you look out of bounds? Great pass, but he’s not fooling anybody
English
1
0
1
82
John Hollinger
John Hollinger@johnhollinger·
Somebody clip that no-look pass by Pec. We're getting clowned rn #RCTID
English
1
0
4
33.9K
Andrew Grim
Andrew Grim@stopdropandrew·
@daphnehk Had a recent realization, my kids only know chalk as a “draw on anything outdoors” tool and not a learning instrument. We’ve come so far
English
1
0
1
39
Daphne Keller
Daphne Keller@daphnehk·
It's way more fun to draw circles on the whiteboard for this one, but slides will do in a pinch. 11/
Daphne Keller tweet mediaDaphne Keller tweet media
English
2
1
4
591
Daphne Keller
Daphne Keller@daphnehk·
Finally getting around to publishing my latest class syllabus! It's been a while since I taught my basic Internet speech platform regulation class. Here is the 2024 version. docs.google.com/document/d/1yB… 1/
English
2
18
84
12.8K
Andrew Grim
Andrew Grim@stopdropandrew·
LLMs: Never been easier to ship a demo Never been harder to ship a product
English
0
0
2
61
Andrew Grim
Andrew Grim@stopdropandrew·
@roybahat used your tip of sending a forwardable email to great effect today. Thanks for that one!
English
0
0
1
19
Andrew Grim
Andrew Grim@stopdropandrew·
@maccoinnich They took out the planter in the middle of 33rd at Rosa parks which I do not understand, it was great for crossing there!
English
0
0
0
21
Iain
Iain@maccoinnich·
Commissioner Mapps voted for the bike lane that the Bureau he supposedly oversees is about to remove
Iain tweet media
English
1
0
19
803