Scottri

153 posts

Scottri

Scottri

@stri1029

Katılım Ekim 2016
302 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@mateosfo @BlakeKellii I agree with most points. I don't think mitigation efforts at community level should be done by the commissioner. I'm not defending home level mitigation efforts. I was responding Blake's comment.
English
0
0
1
19
(((Matthew Lewis))) cults & consequences
@stri1029 @BlakeKellii Mitigations on individual homes do not prevent fires or save those homes, the insurers are empirically correct. Only mitigations at community/neighborhood scale can do that. Unless the insurance commissioner will mandate them, they won't happen.
English
3
0
2
25
(((Matthew Lewis))) cults & consequences
This is perhaps the worst socialist policy idea I've ever seen and while it sucks they have a shot at getting it through, I'm grateful to David for helping raise its salience. Public insurance for homes would lead to instantaneous bankruptcy for the State of California.
David Dayen@ddayen

An important race affecting affordability for millions is totally off the radar. Jane Kim, candidate for California insurance commissioner, is pitching a single payer program for disaster insurance, to align insurance with homeowners. prospect.org/2026/05/14/jan…

English
9
21
248
18.2K
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@mateosfo @BlakeKellii I just feel like a policy of "4 million people potentially being displaced oh well" is not really a tenable political solution. Granted neither is the current situation either.
English
1
0
0
15
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@mateosfo @BlakeKellii What's not right? Insurers did not want to offer discounts for mitigation because they didn't believe in their effects on preventing fires. The state passed a law requiring them to. But those discounts have been minimal.
English
2
0
1
29
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@mattyglesias And yet he has this stupid idea on freezing insurance rates. Seems like they needs to cut a bigger check.
English
1
0
0
12
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@BlakeKellii @mateosfo Also insurance companies were originally largely unwilling to offer incentives for fireproofing homes until the insurance commissioner stepped in. Not saying this wouldn't eventually happen in an open market. But that's how it played out.
English
2
0
1
32
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@BlakeKellii @mateosfo I agree with that. But mitigation measures cost billions and are reflected in the state budget and utility rates. So costs are being spread out. Mitigation isn't moving fast enough to keep up with risk, though. Again, a larger fix needed.
English
1
0
1
25
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@mateosfo I get that. I am saying the wildfire threat is substantial and extends to urban areas. You are suggesting millions of people being priced out of their homes, equity gone, substantial loss of local revenue. A larger fix is needed.
English
1
0
0
21
(((Matthew Lewis))) cults & consequences
@stri1029 one way to avoid forcing taxpayers from bailing out private homeowners is to allow the price of living in high risk areas be reflected in the cost of the homes in those areas. actually, that's not quite right. it's the only way
English
0
0
3
35
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@mateosfo Baccera's plan is dumber, but the state does need to figure out how to spread the cost of wildfire risk for utility rate payers and homeowners. These aren't just rural homes. Risk is high in a bunch of urban areas as well. You could easily end up like Florida.
English
1
0
0
43
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@djw172 Not endorsing her plan but people being pushed onto the FAIR plan are not just rural homeowners. The fire risk is now in urban areas. See the fires last January in LA. Cali has to find a way to equitably spread those costs or housing willl be cost prohibited in more urban places.
English
0
0
0
10
David Watkins
David Watkins@djw172·
She's done a lot in her political career to make housing in San Francisco as expensive as possible; there's real continuity with her plan to use insurance regulation to enact a massive wealth transfer from mostly urban low-risk homeowners to mostly rural high risk homeowners.
David Dayen@ddayen

An important race affecting affordability for millions is totally off the radar. Jane Kim, candidate for California insurance commissioner, is pitching a single payer program for disaster insurance, to align insurance with homeowners. prospect.org/2026/05/14/jan…

English
1
3
19
1.2K
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@SaladBarFan People who lost their houses in Palisades, Eaton are just boomer vacation homes?
English
1
0
0
20
RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS
RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS@SaladBarFan·
On top of already making it impossible for young people to afford housing in CA, the anti-monopoly people also want to tax us to subsidize boomer vacation homes in disaster prone areas
David Dayen@ddayen

An important race affecting affordability for millions is totally off the radar. Jane Kim, candidate for California insurance commissioner, is pitching a single payer program for disaster insurance, to align insurance with homeowners. prospect.org/2026/05/14/jan…

English
7
16
231
8K
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@b2b_mikey @jasonc_nc I agree more insurers are needed but also need to find another way to spread costs. Or else you'll end up like Florida where costs are so high the market is gone.
English
0
0
0
9
Mikey
Mikey@b2b_mikey·
@stri1029 @jasonc_nc I just don't see a good solution that doesn't involve letting insurance companies price risk correctly and invite competition into the market. This seems like the opposite.
English
1
0
0
23
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@b2b_mikey @jasonc_nc And also no this isn't the stupidest suggestion ever. The stupidest is Baccera's idea of freezing premiums. I don't think we should spread these costs out among just homeowners tho.
English
0
0
0
7
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@b2b_mikey @jasonc_nc I think the problem is places that used to not be high risk are now high risk. So unless we should just let places like Palisades or Eaton become unlivable, we need to figure out the insurance thing.
English
2
0
0
27
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@ddayen I think generally asking who should bare the cost of wildfire risk across both insurance and electricity markets, it should not just be ratepayers and home owners. I don't think the insurance commissioner can fix this because it's a larger legislative problem.
English
0
0
0
52
David Dayen
David Dayen@ddayen·
An important race affecting affordability for millions is totally off the radar. Jane Kim, candidate for California insurance commissioner, is pitching a single payer program for disaster insurance, to align insurance with homeowners. prospect.org/2026/05/14/jan…
English
14
29
102
88.1K
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@sarthakgh Now include behind the meter solar and battery.
English
0
0
0
6
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@ramez I would say if you look at who has ballooned the debt in the last 30 years, Republican also don't reckon with this enough either.
English
0
0
0
5
Lauren Chen
Lauren Chen@TheLaurenChen·
My favorite piece of California lore is the fact that the state could have a budget surplus if it just stopped paying for Healthcare for illegal immigrants But they won't So instead they have one of the worst deficits in the country
Lauren Chen tweet mediaLauren Chen tweet media
English
155
1.4K
13K
396.2K
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@kausmickey It was a wildfire in the middle of the winter. Unless people like you acknowledge the increase risk of climate change is increasing costs in a number of ways, we can't fix the issues.
English
0
0
0
5
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@RealBrittHughes I literally don't know what the critique is here. As long as you say California sucks with a certain tone on here, 100s of bots will just like it.
English
0
0
0
4
Brittany Hughes
Brittany Hughes@RealBrittHughes·
This sounds cool. But wait. 400 diapers will last a family with a newborn approximately five weeks. The program will cost the state approx. $12.4 million this year alone. That money will be funneled through a company called Baby2Baby, which will then provide their branded diapers to 400 participating in hospitals (California has over 500 hospitals in total.) Meaning that instead of lowering taxes and letting families keep their own money to buy essentials like diapers, California takes their money, pumps it through a “nonprofit” that has overhead and whose CEO made $240,000 in 2024, to provide a “free” service available only in certain locations, and that you could have bought yourself for much cheaper.
FactPost@factpostnews

Gov. Gavin Newsom has announced California will be the first state in the nation to provide free diapers to newborns. Families will receive 400 diapers when discharged from the hospital.

English
2K
5.4K
27.4K
2.6M
Scottri
Scottri@stri1029·
@Ross_Warren9 @johnloeber The problem is climate change has increased risk/cost. People don't want increased costs. Florida tried this and prices increased while carriers left state. What needs to happen is a broader discussion on how to pay for the increase wildfire risks- insurance and utility rates.
English
0
0
0
14
Ross Warren
Ross Warren@Ross_Warren9·
@johnloeber More saying if you fix the environment more - they'll bring in new solutions!
English
1
0
1
29
John Loeber 🎢
John Loeber 🎢@johnloeber·
New Podcast! Natural disasters make the Insurance Commissioner California's most important office after Governor. But insurance is broken in California. Homeowners can't get decent coverage. Why? And how do we fix it? I interviewed Patrick Wolff for answers.
English
5
2
19
1.5K