Far Right Liberal

Government in America, adding up federal/state/local, spends $33,559 per person. Is your family of four getting $134,236 worth of services from government every year? We don’t need a Department of Government Efficiency. We need a Department of Government Elimination.

@DefiantLs The most qualified was George Bush Sr. In the modern age of popularity contest voting I do not imagine that will ever be surpassed.

Kamala Harris: People were telling me I was the most qualified candidate to ever run for president "I'm just speaking fact"

@KurtSchlichter Also, Canada is experiencing a FAR greater surge in Measles per capita than the US.

Hey, who are the people who are getting measles?

@Tesla any location* *except Europe

Works with any location, not just Home or Work

"Hey Grok” lets you ask a question or set a location-based reminder Enable via Controls > Audio

@ChristiansSTDT What created the creator? Whatever argument you use to justify the spontaneous existence of God can be applied to the spontaneous existence of reality.

And you wonder why people laugh at you....

@bdquinn Property tax is a wealth tax. All wealth taxes are bad.

Property taxes are actually a fairly good tax.

@TheDemocrats what a dumb platform position

TAX THE RICH

@sp4rkl3jumpr0p3 Some people are worth 100 times more than others.

Outrage at a CEO only getting £120k a year and not outrage at the cleaner only getting £12k a year is why the country is in such a mess

@GordonJohnson19 @SpaceX It’s profitable because they get the $28m rate. Your conditional based on $74m doesn’t exist. This is why Starlink is profitable while no other satellite internet service is. I don’t see the issue.

So, it seems, that @SpaceX is like a big family that owns two businesses: 🚀 A rocket ship taxi company (the launch business) that takes things to space for people 🛰️ A WiFi business (Starlink) that uses satellites in space to give people internet Now, the rocket taxi is really popular. When other people want to use it, they have to pay a lot of money (i.e., ~$74mn vs. the $28mn @SpaceX charges @Starlink) — like taking an expensive cab. But when the WiFi business needs to send its satellites to space, it uses the family's own taxi — and the family charges itself a much cheaper price ($28mn). Like how your parents might drive you somewhere for free, but a stranger would have to pay for an Uber. This means the WiFi business looks really profitable, because it's not paying full price to get its satellites up there. And the rocket business looks like it's doing a lot of work for cheap — but that's okay because it's still in the family. So, it seems, now that everyone gets to look at the books... the WiFi business (@Starlink) is actually not at all profitable - i.e., to achieve breakeven, analysts assume each @Starlink launch must cost less than $50mn in total (satellites + launch combined); that implies a Falcon 9 launch is charged to @Starlink at under $28mn (less than half the ~$74mn market rate @SpaceX charges external customers). Hey @theinformation/@TMFAssociates... does this sound about right?

@nonregemesse The conductor is a biological metronome and volume sliders. Not much else.

You’re telling me if the conductor didn’t wave his hand a certain way all these musicians would be clueless as to what they should do?

@UnotheInvestor Investing is about future potential, not current output. If you only wait until everything is fully realized you’ve missed the boat. I’m betting on Optimus and Robo Taxi changing the world. 10 year plan stuff. I am not concerned about short term FSD and vehicle sales.

$TSLA is trading at 324x earnings right now. Not 30x like $AAPL. Not 20x like $GOOGL. 324x. And for that premium you get: Missed deliveries, 50,000 unsold cars. Europe down 49%. Revenue shrinking. Down 22% YTD while the market hits all time highs. You’re not investing. You’re donating. What am I missing?

@jarrettdecoded @BladeoftheS Only for dumb people

@BladeoftheS that whole “eat the rich” thing sounds a lot more appetizing for society as a whole the longer billionaires force their vision for a dystopian future on us, eh?

The USA is the richest country on the planet it could have everything, the best healthcare, the best schools, the longest life expectancy, the best wages, the best pensions. Instead it has 1000 billionaires with $10tn.

@caitoz Being "team human" and being "team Iran" are incompatible positions.

I don't mind admitting that I hope the US and Israel suffer a crushing, devastating defeat in Iran. I hope this war collapses the entire US empire. My only loyalty is to humanity, and being on Team Human in today's world means being against the US empire and against Israel.

@xoaanya New jobs will exist that never did before. 100 years ago you would have objected to automobiles putting horse breeders, trainers, shoers, and shit scrapers out of work.

Everyone says AI will replace most jobs. But if there are no jobs, there’s no income. No income means no spending. So how does the economy even function? What am I missing?

@thetonymichaels Artemis IV is a great reminder that we still need SpaceX to return humans to the surface.

@pelositracker FREEDOM OF THE PRESS

Nick Shirley's video exposing $170,000,000 in California fraud got 7.7 million views California Democrats just advanced AB 2624 — a bill that would let the filmed organizations demand his videos be taken down Penalty for non-compliance: up to $10,000 per violation and potential jail time The bill was written by Assemblywoman Mia Bonta Coincidentally, her husband is California's Attorney General He also just announced his own $267,000,000 Medi-Cal fraud bust 4 days before her bill advanced @nickshirleyy

@james_xond language

If you had to pick one, what’s the greatest invention ever made by humanity?

The fact there is no plural for "you" in english is annoying

@RAWigger “I would call you fat behind your back but I only have a half tank of gas” -Al Bundy

@ninaturner Billionaires became billionaires because they offered goods and services at a competitive rate and earned everyone’s business. They objectively reduce prices and make our lives more affordable.

@Laureasons_ X is objectively better than old Twitter Less censorship. Creator revenue sharing. Video. Live streaming. Edit button. Grok. Built in translation. More users. More user hours. Financially profitable. You just want your safe space echo chamber back.

Why couldn’t Elon buy LinkedIn instead, that app deserves to be ruined the way he’s ruining Twitter.