Sy Ableman

Perfection.

>Vance’s chief-of-staff interned for Tucker >Tucker’s son works for Vance >Tucker convinced Trump to pick Vance as his VP >Vance is an entity created by Thiel >Tucker consults Thiel for “every major life decision”

@SebMinga @YveK22 Du beliebst wohl zu scherzen.

@syabl3man @YveK22 Ich mach dir nen Vorschlag: Syrien nimmt deutsche Frauen und Kinder und startet damit den Wiederaufbau. Hört sich gut an?

Merz strebt die Remigration von hunderttausenden Syrern an. Das will er gemeinsam mit dem Islamisten-Präsidenten von Syrien in den nächsten drei Jahren umsetzen. Aber jetzt gibt es erst mal 200 Millionen Euro deutsches Steuergeld für den islamischen Ex-Kopfabschneider im feinen Zwirn.

@SebMinga @nachronismus @YveK22 Ignorier den Deppen. Bin selbst Humanist und sehr daran interessiert, das Leid auf der Welt zu verringern. Allerdings möchte ich auch das Interesse Europas berücksichtigen, keine allzu heftigen ethnischen und demographischen Veränderungen durchmachen zu müssen.

@nachronismus @syabl3man @YveK22 „aufspielen“, alles klar. Und es geht uns was an, weil Kinder dort sterben, aber ist ja okay, wenn euch die egal sind.

@SebMinga @YveK22 Ich wüsste gerne, welche ethischen Probleme du mit diesem pragmatischen Arrangement siehst.

@syabl3man @YveK22 Also Syrien die Zukunft nehmen? Inwiefern ist das ein Wiederaufbau?

@SebMinga @YveK22 Frauen und Kinder selbstredend nur temporär aufnehmen.

@SebMinga @YveK22 Auch die Umma hat eine Verantwortung. Nur kolonialistische, rassistische und eurozentrierte Extremisten sprechen der Umma die Fähigkeit ab, hier selbstbestimmt und ohne das Geld der Kafiri eine annehmbare Lösung für die Rechtgläubigen zu finden.

@SebMinga @YveK22 Frauen und Kinder hier her, Männer, vor allem die jungen, zurück zum Wiederaufbau. Deal?

@YveK22 Was bedeutet denn „mehr als ausreichend“ für die, die dort in Syrien leben? Das Assad-Regime hinterlässt >15Mio Menschen, die hum. Hilfe benötigen, also Nahrung, Wasser, Dach überm Kopf… Empfinden sie da kein bisschen Empathie für die Menschen, allen voran Frauen und Kinder?

Giving a lie detector test to traumatized women, what a great way to quash and discredit reporting. The whole basis is measuring physiological signs of distress FFS.

“2 Months”

The stories of F2M transition tend to conform to these readily understood taxonomies because only a handful of things would drive someone to cut off healthy body parts and surgically remove their healthy reproductive systems: "actually being a man" is not one of them. That's just the propaganda that agents of the societywide cultlike multi-level marketing campaign use to sell practices from the outer limits of human extremity to ordinary girls who have been hurt by the world. This is just the latest in a long tradition of American medical quackery targeting desperate and hurt people. It is the most insidious form of medical quackery ever unleased on the world because the salesmen managed something nobody else has ever done: disguised their product as scientifically validated with the aid of medical lobbies, though it never was, and successfully mimicked civil rights praxis, though it is an assault on the civil rights of every citizen. At its foundation is a cult of medicalized self-harm that manages to pump damaged people full of an illusion of certitude and identity that cannot withstand reality and that must therefore strive to deploy coercive state power to keep the whole world plunged into unreality.

@IonaItalia @Quietdespairing It’s kind of astonishing that when asked people go ‘it’s because once he has a foothold in a country he can demand that the state honour his right to family reconciliation and bring 20 of his nearest and dearest to our country’ as if that’s a good thing.

I remember the time when you were called a Nazi if you pointed out that the majority of the so-called refugees were young, able-bodied men. This was denied till the cows came home. Media spread pictures of the few women and children, and shelters had to tell people to stop donating children's clothes since they had no need for those.

This is such a great point. If it's "just a few men" then obviously we should ignore them and prioritise women. Otherwise we're saying that thousands of women aren't even the equivalent of one special man.

@cancivlib What a joy to see Canadian Civil Libtards being ratioed into oblivion. Liberalism of the real kind will be better off without your "advocacy".

New rules announced by the International Olympic Committee risk undermining the principle that sport is a human right. Policies that exclude athletes and authorize invasive testing have no place in a rights-respecting sporting system. ccla.org/press-release/…

@hecheateddotorg @PeterTatchell This bit especially 👏 "Why on earth are you demanding women who do everything they can to maximize their athletic potential should give up our opportunities and awards to men who are trying to minimize theirs?"

helft mir mal. ich kenne die nicht. und ja, ich halte viele derer, die da gerade aktivistisch unterwegs sind, für unglaubwürdig und in teilen ihrer positionen auch für frauenfeindlich. ABER. alles, was sie da sagt ist: bei uns läuft vieles schief. es ist zb normalisiert, frauen zu sexualisieren oder sie unter alkohol zu setzen, um sie ‚willig‘ zu machen. konkret: ihr einverständnis zu umgehen. und dass wir darüber reden müssen. es aufzeigen und kritisieren. uns klar machen, was da los ist. stopp sagen. ist selbst diese debatte nicht möglich? auch viele der kommentare aus meiner sicht total erschütternd, sogar von ehemaligen followern, die in sachen trans ganz auf meiner seite waren. was ist da los?

Smith also *magically* discovered my precise work location (before @VCHhealthcare fired me for saying that women don’t have penises) and came to “educate” the exact hospital unit I worked on about how misgendering is a crime. What a crazy *coincidence*…

The "transchild" evidence problem - transgenderism's Achilles heel The basis of all social and medical interventions on the "transchild" rest on the assumption that this is a child with an immutable, inherent gender identity. However when you look at the evidence for the innate gender identity it is quite remarkably weak. Neurological evidence Studies finding brain structure similarities between transgender women and natal females - most famously work on the BSTc region of the hypothalamus - have significant problems: tiny samples, adult subjects who had undergone years of hormone treatment, and a brain region known to be shaped by hormones rather than fixed at birth. More recent neuroimaging studies produce inconsistent results that do not replicate reliably. No neurological marker for identifying a transgender child has ever been established. Twin studies Higher concordance for gender dysphoria in identical than fraternal twins suggests some genetic contribution, but concordance in identical twins remains well below one hundred percent, meaning genetic factors alone cannot determine outcome. A genetic contribution to temperament that makes certain experiences more likely is not the same as evidence of an innate fixed identity. Early childhood expression The claim that consistent early cross-sex identification predicts later persistence is undermined by the desistance literature. Multiple longitudinal studies report resolution rates of sixty to ninety percent without medical intervention. The minority who persist cannot be reliably identified in advance from the majority who will not. Cross cultural evidence Gender variant individuals exist across cultures and throughout history, but the forms vary enormously, the social meanings differ, and none of these accounts describe children identified in early childhood as having a fixed identity requiring medical affirmation. This diversity supports social shaping, not biological fixity. Felt authenticity That transgender-identified individuals describe their identity as deeply felt is real, but felt authenticity is not evidence of innateness. Social learning produces experiences that feel entirely self generated, exactly what Vygotsky and Bandura would predict. What the major reviews concluded The Cass Review (2024), the US HHS systematic review (2025), and the Scandinavian reviews from Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Denmark all reached consistent conclusions: the evidence base is weak, study quality is low, comorbidities were inadequately assessed, and long-term outcomes are unknown. Perhaps most striking is what half a century of intensive child development research did not find. Piaget, Kohlberg, Vygotsky, Bowlby, Winnicott, and Bandura documented childhood in extraordinary detail across incompatible theoretical traditions. None of them described the innate, fixed, identifiable gender identity now at the centre of clinical practice. That absence requires explanation, and social suppression does not adequately supply one. The evidence problem cuts to the heart of the transgender framework as it applies to children. If the innate fixed identity claim is not established, and the major independent reviews suggest it is not, then the entire clinical edifice built on that claim loses its foundation. Social transition, puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and surgical intervention on children are all justified on the basis that the child's identity is real, fixed, and requires affirmation rather than exploration. Remove that justification and what remains is a medical pathway applied to children on the basis of an unproven hypothesis, with permanent consequences. And remove the photogenic "trans kids" from the trans movement, what are you left with?

@RupertLowe10 @YorkshiremanDan The UK now has the highest figure of rapes in Europe. The UK recorded 71,227 in 2024. That's 195 per DAY. And these are just the ones reported. This is a 9x increase from 7801 in 2000. It's no wonder they don't want the data out there - but we all know. Horrific.

This is what women have to deal with when we say that men are not women. Paul here isn't very bright though because firstly I'm not a councillor. I'm a counsellor. And secondly my "beliefs" (which are facts) are protected under the equality act. So he can report me to my professional body if he wants. They already FAFO though and they're now facing legal action as a direct result. Last summer 5 people complained to them and I was suspended. They later reinstated me because the complaints did not meet the criteria of a complaint. They are now refusing to send me all of the information that they hold about me under a subject access request in November and so I am about to start legal proceedings. Why do they not want me to see the 65 emails between themselves and 5 people who tried to ruin my career? What did they say about me in them?