tabes

@deemike16 @JonnyRoot_ lol

@tabes0 @Planter5657 @JonnyRoot_ @SavvyTamz_57 Lol. Imagine following a heretic instead of the Church started by Christ.

Mike Vrabel: Insinuates his Christian RB is “uneducated” after defending Jaden Ivey, & warns him about sharing personal beliefs because they “represent the team” & “the organization." Vrabel days later: Goes to an adults-only resort with NFL Insider Dianna Russini. They’re seen interlocking fingers & hanging by the pool. What a hypocrite.

@Planter5657 @JonnyRoot_ It’s really not as complex as you’re making it. There are many catholic beliefs that are heretical and not in the Bible. It’s as simple as that. Indulgences, purgatory, literal body and blood of Christ, confession to a priest, praying to saints, papal authority, mariology.

Well, I appreciate this statement of such flagrant Ignorance is a way of proving my point. Protestants use a 66-book Old Testament (following the later Jewish canon after Christ), while Catholics include the deuterocanonical books used by Jesus and the apostles (quoted or alluded to in the New Testament) and affirmed by early councils. The Church, guided by the Spirit, determined the canon—not the other way around. Claiming Catholicism isn’t “biblical” is using a 16th-century interpretive lens (Reformation-era) to judge a Church that traces directly to the apostles. Where does the Bible teach sola scriptura? How did Christians know the faith correctly for the first 300+ years without a complete, universally agreed Bible? Why do so many Protestant doctrines (like the exact canon or certain views on justification) rely on extra-biblical reasoning or selective emphasis? Catholicism doesn’t pit the Bible against the Church—it sees the Bible as the inspired written record of the faith lived out in the Church. The two are harmonious. Development of doctrine (clarifying truths over time, like the Trinity, which also isn’t explicitly “spelled out” in one verse) is guided by the same Spirit who inspired Scripture. Liturgical Catholic coverage in the three-year Sunday Mass cycle cycle: • 58% of the Gospels (the four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). • 41% of the entire New Testament (combining the above).

@Planter5657 @JonnyRoot_ @SavvyTamz_57 Catholicism is so far from the Bible, and that is why many of us have no issue with that comment. Thank God for Luther.

@JonnyRoot_ @SavvyTamz_57 Disagree? Of course not. This is what he said: “Catholicism is a false religion” and “does not lead to salvation in Jesus Christ” This is just “ disagreement” to you? Goodness gracious… What an ignorant and dishonest take.

@GenePrincipe gene can I get a pic after the game!?

@kaiju_kam Unique, yes. Ugly and hard to look at, yes

If you think the art style of Marathon is bad then you simply just have shit taste. This is one of the most unique looking AAA shooters of the past few years.

@shergill2000 @Mann_O_Steel17 @TheNotoriousMMA Team Canada has barely been winning any of their games this time around. Far from dominant.

@Mann_O_Steel17 @TheNotoriousMMA Considering Canadian men always dominate the International stage, it isn’t really all that fun to watch. Unless you like watching dynasties dominate their lesser opponents

Hockey is BADASS!

@mfarrellsports Mike didn’t watch the NFC championship and it shows.

Is Sam Darnold the worst QB to win a Super Bowl?

@zain49ers Didn’t happen

It’s funny how literally no one is talking about Sam Darnold leading the league in turnovers this year and how they basically been hiding him for weeks now. Eventually he’s going to turn back into a pumpkin.

@ItsPlayful_ lol

Look me in the eyes with a straight face and tell me you think Sam Darnold’s beating Drake Maye. I’ll wait

@ptsbyhandcarltn @grok @GMble83 @droptaco @SleeperNFL Well that didn’t work out the way you thought

Patriots because they dont have a QB that's gonna piss down their own leg and they have a coaching staff that has the experience to make their team more prepared to win this game. Intangibles matter it's not all stats. Unfortunately a bad matchup for Seattle. Sorry Seahawks fans but y'all had a great season. Even won me $$ winning the division but just like a few years back gonna fall a yard short 🤷‍♂️

Hey @grok, remove the team that's losing in the Super Bowl.

@Ghost_Five_Nine It does require more skill and strategy than most other ARPG’s that are quite easy and forgiving. That’s part of what makes it great.

@thomasmahler This is great. I love the game and love the direction you’re taking it. Colin should get you back on sacred symbols soon to talk about the future of wicked in depth. @longislandviper

What’s interesting is that a lot of players already seem to intuit where this journey is heading. We constantly get messages like: “There should totally be a Tower Defense mode where players defend Sacrament!” And the funny thing is, I actually tested tower defense mechanics in the very first Wicked prototypes. And yes, it worked. It was genuinely fun. We also regularly hear from Battle Royale fans how “easy” it would be to add a BR mode once Isola Sacra is fully built. I’m not personally a huge Battle Royale player, but as a designer, I can absolutely see how it could work. Suddenly you’d have a Battle Royale that isn’t a shooter, but one built around animation-commit combat, positioning, and a full RPG system underneath it. That’s really the point. Once you build a strong enough foundation - a world, a combat system, a set of systemic rules that all play nicely together - entirely new genres stop being massive, standalone projects. They become expressions of the same underlying game. About a hundred years ago, Tolkien didn’t just write a single book. He built a world. Middle-earth wasn’t created to serve one story - it became a place where many stories could exist. I don’t see why games couldn’t work the same way. And I genuinely believe No Rest for the Wicked could be that kind of game.

I wanted to comment on this, but it’s probably better to explain it properly here 👍 Our ambitions actually go beyond “revolutionizing ARPGs". We’re not just building a game - we’re building a platform. A world and a foundation that Moon Studios can keep expanding on for many years. That’s why I’ve said before that we’ll likely be working on No Rest for the Wicked for the next decade. And yes, feel free to call me crazy again - I’ve heard it before 😄 The reality is that over the last several years, we’ve been deliberately building Wicked in a way that allows multiple genres to coexist and reinforce each other inside the same game, instead of living in separate, disconnected products. Once you spend enough time with Wicked, I think it becomes clearer how this can work. Take the Crucible, for example. There’s no reason why its roguelite side couldn’t evolve into one of the best roguelite experiences out there. The combat system already has the depth and responsiveness needed - what’s left is expanding content, progression, and systemic depth. Personally, I could sink dozens of hours into that mode alone once it reaches its full potential. And because it’s Wicked, it’s multiplayer by default. Inside the Crucible, we’ve also prototyped a Horde / Survivor-style mode, inspired by games like Vampire Survivors. We already have the enemies, the combat, the boons, the bosses - it’s a natural extension. And again, co-op is baked in from the start. See where this is going? Last year, I prototyped a Survival Mode in Wicked by disabling the campaign and allowing players to place structures freely across Isola Sacra. Suddenly, the game felt closer to Don’t Starve Together: building small settlements, managing safety, and surviving the night. Blizzard spent years trying to build a survival game from scratch and eventually canceled it. We’re approaching it from the opposite direction - by building on an existing, proven foundation. Then there’s PvP. Our combat system already lends itself naturally to it. Instead of just trading hits, players would need to think about positioning, terrain and arena layout. Inspirations here come from games like Nidhogg, Bomberman and Power Stone. I genuinely think we could explore a new kind of 3D fighting experience in that space. And on the other end of the spectrum, there’s farming. Once you reach Sacrament, you’ll be able to buy a farmhouse and essentially play Wicked like Harvest Moon or Stardew Valley: planting crops, watering fields, maintaining your land. A simple, self-contained loop - but incredibly addictive. Right now, our highest priority is getting the core ARPG experience ready for 1.0. After that, while part of the team focuses on the next expansion, others will continue iterating on these systems through regular updates - keeping the world alive and evolving until we’re ready to expand the story again. This is also why I’ve said that a game like Wicked would be nearly impossible to pitch at a traditional AAA publisher. A concept like this would get you shown the door. But we’ve already built the foundation - carefully, deliberately, over years. At this point, it would be a crime not to fully explore what it can become 👍

@thomasmahler The game is outstanding, even now. I have no doubt $60 will be a fair price at 1.0.

Since I’m getting a lot of messages about this, just to clarify: The current 40% sale is a one-time promotion to celebrate and support No Rest for the Wicked Together. The goal was to make it as easy as possible for people to jump in and play together - and paired with the free weekend, that clearly worked 👍 I’m not trying to do any FOMO marketing here, but yes: when we hit 1.0, No Rest for the Wicked will move to $60, because it’s a premium title. We’ve announced this a long time ago and repeated it several times. The reason the game launched at $40 was simple: Early Access players should get a discount. BG3 launched into Early Access at full price, and personally I never loved that approach. If you support a game early, you should get some extra love. I’m only saying this now so nobody’s surprised or upset later. If you’ve been on the fence about Wicked, the current sale is genuinely a good time to jump in. That’s all - just transparency! 👍❤️ store.steampowered.com/app/1371980/No…

@TootenTV The game is already worth $60 in early access imo. The quality is much, much higher than poe or diablo. Completely justified, and it will work, especially with a solid long term road map.

IMO, big mistake. At $40, yeah, I could justify it. $23 for SURE. I ain’t buying this at $60. Not when I can buy PoE2 EA for $30, and that’ll be free at 1.0. PoE1 is F2P. You can get D4 on gamepass, and it’s almost always on sale. Last Epoch is $34.

@thomasmahler @IamHojo The game is completely worth $60 in its current state even, imo.

@IamHojo That’s quite a ridiculous statement to make. It looks like 1.0 will give most players 100+ hours of enjoyment, so the value proposition is comparatively extremely good.

60$ for this game is an terrible marketing positioning. The experience is worth 35-40$ AT MAX. The discount price is the perfect price tag. 60$ is a mistake.

@IamHojo This is an incredibly awful opinion lol. I just started the game this weekend and am amazed at the insanely high quality of literally everything in the game. There’s no other arpg with this much soul. It’s completely unique and stands apart from games like diablo 4 and poe2.

@zain49ers That pumpkin was slinging PERFECT passes tonight

@thomasmahler Can you play co op right from the start of the game, or is there some preliminary tutorial to do before co op begins?

Since people sent us questions on how to get friends to play No Rest for the Wicked Together, here's a helpful step-by-step guide: 1) Step out of your cave (After you showered and put on clothes) 2) Find another human that seems interesting (doesn't matter if they're a dangler or not) 3) Say 'Hello!' 4) Casually bring up that - on occasion - you enjoy playing videogames 5) Watch Reaction - If good, proceed, if bad, start again at step 2 6) Tell them that No Rest for the Wicked Together will be on sale for 40% off today (throw in a casual compliment) 7) If they didn't quite get the hint, purchase a second copy and act like you just had another key lying around (you don't want to come on too strong) 8) Use the opportunity to schedule a playdate 9) Have the time of your life playing together (resist the urge of throwing your new-found friend off a cliff) 10) After you finished, casually ask: "Was it as good for you as it was for me?" to ensure repeat performances. Well, there you go. That should do it! 👍🤣

@kylamb8 @NFL_DovKleiman Some people (like Kyle) do not understand down by contact and it shows.. lol

@NFL_DovKleiman No matter how super slow mo you go, it’s still not a catch. He loses control immediately after his back hits the ground. No control ergo no possession ergo no catch.

𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴: NFL Films has released new footage that shows Bills WR Brandin Cooks CLEARLY caught the ball. The refs somehow ruled this an interception essentailly giving the Broncos the win over Buffalo. One of the worst calls in NFL history...

@scottwalker99 @NFL_DovKleiman So you have to stand up after a catch for it to be a catch? So a defender could strip the ball from you three seconds after you’re down by contact and it would count as an interception? Since when? Does down by contact not mean anything anymore?

@NFL_DovKleiman you are nuts. This was an obvious interception. Cooks did NOT "catch" the ball or you would have seen him stand up after the "catch" holding the damn football.. Learn the rules dude...