Something Something

@doctor_rahmeh Doesnt he believe on the basis of some Kabbalahistic hocus-pocus that Jews are a different species to the rest of us whether we are Iranic, Arab, Slav or Celt?

Itamar Ben-Gvir is the child of Iraqi-Kurdish immigrants. He is ethnically Iranic. His wife, Ayala Nimrodi, is the child of Iraqi immigrants. She is ethnically Arab. They steal Palestinian land and call for the death penalty for Palestinians—on the basis of religion.

Mehdi, can we just please put the partisan games away for one second and realize we need members of both sides to fight this fight? I’m genuinely asking politely and sincerely. He’s constantly under fire for exposing the truth about our relationship with Israel. You don’t have to sleep with him. You don’t have to love him or even like him. But please don’t join forces with Zionists to bury him on this issue. He’s right on Israel. We should encourage that.

@SwarmMindsharer @I_amMukhtar Tommeh Ten Names is not Anglo-Saxon though.

@I_amMukhtar Racist? England is the only home of Anglo-Saxon people. Deal with it.

There’s a mosque just minutes’ walk from the route of Tommy Robinson’s racist riots. The Met needs to cancel it.

مقایسه #قالیباف با ونس غلطه: قالیبات در ۲۰ سالگی فرمانده بوده در یکی از بزرگترین جنگ‌های قرن بیستم. قالیباف در تحول هوا‌فضای سپاه نقش بزرگ داشته قالیباف پلیس رو متحول کرده قالیباف ۱۲ سال شهردار یکی از پایتخت‌های بزرگ دنیا بوده قالیباف رئیس مجلس بوده... ونس در واقع بچه است‌.

@DillyHussain88 There is a general problem of contemporary Western politics attracting+rewarding people who appear to be soulless robotic psychopaths.

@ronnat23 @Judah0451 @btbsoco It could be that they perceive the concept of truth and therefore of falsehood in a way radically different from Christians+Muslims+most Western+West Asian secular people. Hence a lot of their seeming defuddlement when confronted by our standards.

@tc8283 @Judah0451 @btbsoco Lying is in the nature of Jewish supremacists and Zionists

If only they showed this much concern when Muslims attack monks in Egypt!!!

@nicolelampert @MarinaPurkiss Intent has been proven massively in the case of Gaza (look at the evidence South Africa presented)- in the case of the Shoah not really.

Genocide requires intent. It was used to describe the particular horror of the Holocaust in which the intent to destroy the Jews of Europe meant that while boys were left to defend Berlin, soldiers were still involved in the mass gassing of Jews. They nearly succeeded in their intention, killing more Jews in two weeks than Palestinians killed in two years. In the final six months of the war they killed near 500,000 Hungarian Jews. If Israel intended to wipe out the Palestinians there would be no Palestinians left. This is why the use of this word is so dangerously utilised by people who have unconsciously imbibed Soviet ideology which first labelled this a genocide in the 1960s. If all war is now a genocide, then what word do we have left for actual genocides?

A note… Antisemitism is a vile hatred that must always be condemned Criticising a government is not antisemitism The word genocide was coined by Raphael Lemkin (a Jewish lawyer) to ensure the destruction of a people could never go unnamed I’m not using it loosely - I’m using it correctly …and there is no library of books I could read that would ever make me stay silent while children are bombed and starved Never.

@ronnat23 @Judah0451 @btbsoco These people lie like a carpet.

@Judah0451 @btbsoco It was a Muslim actually

@Judah0451 @btbsoco Nearly all? Can you name one person in the ruling coalition who did?

@btbsoco And they ignore the other Jew who physically intervened to stop him from kicking her and the fact that all of Israel nearly universally condemned the bastard.

@tessia_6 @AmmarKazmi because it serves the interests of Capitalism in various ways.

@tessia_6 @AmmarKazmi Was he an illegal immigrant? I am not a fan of mass immigration but putting a stop to it+deporting all the illegals would still leave England with a mass of problems. Also the biggest wave of immigration happened under Boris Johnson, under a Lowe or Farage you would get even more

The ‘antisemitic terrorism’ narrative around the Golders Green incident on Wednesday has now collapsed. The alleged assailant was mentally unwell with previous convictions for stabbing, dating back years, and he had left psychiatric care in recent days. One of his three victims (yes three, not two!) was a Muslim. While suffering an apparent mental health crisis, two Met officers kicked his head in IDF-style and then the Met justified it like a Netanyahu press conference. We’re supposed to believe this man was an ‘antisemitic terrorist’ in the pay of Iran, motivated to attack Jews because of pro-Palestine protests and chants. This is a total sham and deeply insidious. The mainstream media, politicians, and the Metropolitan Police are colluding with Zionists to exploit this attack to further erode freedom of expression and assembly, and to expand Jewish militias in London. Welcome to the complete Zionisation of British politics!

@Nadeem83Shafqat @RmSalih No one denies that.

@RmSalih Roshan so do the actions of Muslim extremists and Pakistani sexual abusers contribute towards anti-muslim hate?

The actions of the Israeli regime are the main cause of antisemitism in the UK. This is blatantly obvious for anyone with eyes to see.

@thisandthaatt @RmSalih The largest anti-Jewish riots in the UK for in the 1940s. Previously a King due to immense public pressure ethnically cleansed England of Jews in the 13 th century- long before Muslims showed up. Stop being silly.

@RmSalih No, Muslim immigration is the main cause of antisemitism in the UK. This is blatantly obvious for anyone with a brain.

@RmSalih No they are the main cause of what the CAA, BoD, etc call "antisemitism". The main cause of real anti-Jewish anti-Semitism is Jewish involvement in mass immigration+ White Nationalists needing to blame someone but themselves for the mess Western culture is now in.

@EMichaelJones1 I wonder what the President actually said- often they take people's words out of context or deliberately distort them.

Germans love to internalize the commands of their oppressors.

@Blinkeroni @btbsoco Because it is the idolatry of worldly power- the Zionist Entity is extremely powerful. You find the same carry on in Islam as well.

@btbsoco I refuse to believe you have been involved in religion debates for 10+ years and are not aware of the hatred Israelis have for Christians Why do all the Christ debate bros love and defend a country that is filled with ppl who hate Christ??

He needs to spend years in prison for this attack and Israel needs to get a grip of these bigots as they are destroying the reputation of Israel and good will from folks like me.

@Pontifex : Is it objectively true Bishop Barron’s implying that Dignitatis humanae, section 2 is compatible with HR 6090’s IHRA anti-Semitism? His latest clerical foray into the civil realm insinuates the relationship of Zionism to IHRA Moral Relativism as the Catholic Church’s relationship of Faith to Objective Truth (Reason). Do you recognize the Prince of Peace in this, or His betrayal with a kiss? From Dignitatis humanae, section 2: “It is in accordance with their dignity as persons- that is, beings endowed with reason and free will and therefore privileged to bear personal responsibility-that all men should be at once impelled by nature and also bound by a moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth. They are also bound to adhere to the truth, once it is known, and to order their whole lives in accord with the demands of truth However, men cannot discharge these obligations in a manner in keeping with their own nature unless they enjoy immunity from external coercion as well as psychological freedom. Therefore the right to religious freedom has its foundation not in the subjective disposition of the person, but in his very nature. In consequence, the right to this immunity continues to exist even in those who do not live up to their obligation of seeking the truth and adhering to it and the exercise of this right is not to be impeded, provided that just public order be observed.” Bishop Barron, April 28, 2026: “One of the most significant contributions we made [ Religious Liberty Commission] was to bring into sharper relief the issue of church-state relations…we drew special attention to…antisemitism …Our job was to recommend to the president actions he could take, [ H.R. 6090] either through legislation or executive order…. [The Left’s ideologues]…rightly recognize that the advocates of traditional religion [ Zionist Rabbinical Judaism’s representatives] are their most powerful ideological opponents…If church leaders absent themselves from advising government officials, [ promotion of IHRA anti-Semitism definition; HR 6090] then the church's voice [ Dignitatis humanae,2] does not resonate in the halls of power…I'm proud to have contributed to the final statement that we are about to communicate to the president… criticisms and objections…[are] spurious and born…largely out of pique and envy.” [parentheses mine]

@joshxhowie Zionism now is a bit more than it as if you were genuinely concerned about free speech you would know.

Zionism: the belief that Jews have the right to self-determination in our indigenous homeland. Islamism: the belief that Muslims have the right to conquer the entire world.

@PavewayIV @caitoz It is also untrue that it never referred to "Arabs".

@tc8283 @caitoz Semitic Action is not a 'Zionist Group' - kind of the opposite. And the unfortunate choice of 'Semitic' in their title was based on the pejorative reuse by Wilhelm Marr in 1879. 'Semites' in popular use has never referred to Arabs. It did in linguistic use.

Laws aimed at pro-Palestine protests should always be looked at as efforts to ban criticism of Israel. That’s what we’re seeing in the UK as the prime minister encourages the prosecution of anyone who says “globalise the intifada”. “If you stand alongside people who say globalise the intifada, you are calling for terrorism against Jews and people who use that phrase should be prosecuted,” said Keir Starmer during a Thursday press conference. “It is racism, extremely racism and it has left a minority community in this country scared, intimidated, wondering if they belong. So, I say again this government will do everything in our power to stamp this hatred out.” The UK has already banned any expression of support for the activist group Palestine Action, and recently passed a ban on repeat protests, and has already arrested demonstrators for using of the word “intifada” in their pro-Palestine activism on the basis of “racially aggravated public order offences.” And now the prime minister wants them all to be prosecuted with increased aggression. This is all a thinly-disguised effort to throw a chilling effect over the entire pro-Palestine protest movement. The goal is to just keep adding more and more protest laws until nobody’s willing to attend a pro-Palestine demonstration without a lawyer present to advise them on exactly what they may and may not say if they want to avoid being sent to prison. Starmer’s comments were made in response to a non-fatal stabbing of two Jewish men in Golders Green on Wednesday, which the prime minister instantly labeled an “antisemitic attack” and which police say is being treated as a terrorist incident. The entire western political/media class has of course seized on this opportunity to shriek about antisemitism, and to demand crackdowns on anti-Israel speech and pro-Palestine demonstrations. Here in Australia this story has been receiving frenzied wall-to-wall coverage in our propagandistic mainstream press, despite the fact that it’s a story about a non-lethal stabbing on an island on the other side of the planet which experienced some 53,000 blade-related crimes last year. Inconveniently for all the narratives we’re seeing advanced about Jew hate and terrorism, there is as of this writing no public evidence that the attack was motivated by hateful ideology. Britain’s Channel 4 News reports that the suspect, a Somali-born British citizen named Essa Suleiman, had left the care of a psychiatric hospital just days before the attack, and that he has an extensive history of mental illness and violent behavior. In 2008 Suleiman was reportedly incarcerated for assaulting a police officer and his dog; we can probably assume the police dog was not Jewish. Also inconvenient for the antisemitic terrorism narrative is the fact that the two Jewish men weren’t the only victims of Suleiman’s rampage that day. On top of his charges for the Golders Green attack, Suleiman also stands accused of attempting to murder his longtime acquaintance Ishmail Hussein earlier in the day. I’m not an expert at these things but “Hussein” doesn’t sound like a Jewish surname to me, and I think we can safely assume that if there was a third Jewish victim that day it wouldn’t have been kept a secret from the press. If I saw someone go on a stabbing spree attacking Jewish and non-Jewish people immediately after leaving a psychiatric hospital, my first thought would not be “This was definitely a politically motivated act of antisemitic terrorism.” My first thought would be that this was a mentally ill man who was failed by the system, who flipped out and put lives at risk during some kind of psychotic break. In 2020 Suleiman was reportedly referred to Prevent — an early-intervention government program designed to steer vulnerable members of the public away from extremism — but his listing was shelved shortly thereafter. We can only speculate at this point, but this could easily have occurred because the relevant authorities deemed that any red flags his behavior might have thrown up were the product of mental illness rather than any dangerous ideology, after which they tossed his file in the “not our problem” bin. The fact that Suleiman’s violence was not directed only at Jews, combined with the fact that he was struggling with severe mental health issues at the time, would seemingly make it very difficult to prove that his spree had the political or religious motives of a terrorist. Which may be why as of this writing he has only been charged with attempted murder rather than facing any terrorism charges. As you can see, the narrative that this was an antisemitic hate crime necessitating sweeping authoritarian measures is about as flimsy as it gets. But they’re shoving it through anyway, as hard as they can. They are doing this not to protect Jews but to protect the information interests of the state of Israel, with whom the western empire is intimately intertwined. I have said it before and I will say it again: there is no greater threat to free speech in the western world than Israel and its supporters. The whole of western society must resist tooth and claw the mad push to stomp out our right to oppose war, genocide, apartheid, and injustice.