tee

@mike64741 @dizzy_thinks She is wearing her dressing gown over her Lee Cooper tracksuit. The police very politely asked her to get changed after arresting her.

@dizzy_thinks You’re wrong. Wrong, rude and arrogant.

You also misled the House about what was said in court. Letby didn't say she was arrested in her pyjamas. She said she was taken to the Police Station in her pyjamas.

@DebRoberts22249 @HE0776 It's dangerous, the harassment the consultants and medical experts have been subjected to could potentially deter other whistleblowers from raising concerns, when they suspect deliberate harm.

@HE0776 It's absolutely vile.

Absolutely despicable, malicious behaviour. Anything to take the focus away from the evidence that Letby killed babies.

@johnsweeneyroar No

Lucy Letby: Was She Wronged? Episode Three Will there be a retrial? youtube.com/watch?v=ginnFZ…

@DebRoberts22249 It's appallingly disrespectful that they couldn't be bothered to listen to the families barristers. It's very clear that they are mouthpiece for the PR campaign.

Peter Elston and Sonia Poulton both attended the inquiry to hear the execs' barrister apply to halt the inquiry. They left as soon as the families barristers started testifying. What interest do they have exactly in execs on £1.7m pensions? Hmmm.🤔

@SaraG_300 @DebRoberts22249 @Telegraph @sarahknapton @drpaulclarke Very weird behaviour.

@tee11xy @DebRoberts22249 @Telegraph @sarahknapton @drpaulclarke Cleudo blocked me at Baby K’s retrial on the second day I was simply sat there and she said her interest was she was on holiday from Brazil, and she had blocked me before I had made the 20 min journey home… Don’t know how she had found me though to block me 🤷‍♀️

And there we have it - the mask is fully off. Cleuci de Oliveira, occasional @Telegraph contributor working with @sarahknapton, responding to @DrPaulClarke with a level of hostility and bias that no genuinely independent journalist would ever allow themselves to display publicly. This isn’t a one‑off lapse in judgement. It’s part of a sustained pattern in which de Oliveira inserts herself into the Letby debate, not as a reporter gathering facts, but as an active participant defending a predetermined storyline. Her interventions consistently mirror the same selective framing, the same omissions, and the same talking points circulated by the small, tightly‑connected group pushing the “Letby is innocent” narrative. And she was the fixer who facilitated the connection between Sarrita Adams and The New Yorker, resulting in an article that uncritically platformed Adams’ claims while failing to disclose her background, her credibility issues, or the conflicts surrounding her involvement. That wasn’t journalism; it was narrative laundering. When you trace the relationships, the messaging, and the timing, it is clear that de Oliveira is not operating as a neutral reporter. She is functioning as a facilitator for a coordinated narrative about baby murders, using the veneer of journalism to legitimise claims that can't withstand independent scrutiny.

@DebRoberts22249 @Telegraph @sarahknapton @drpaulclarke Her harassment of Liz Hull over the past few days has demonstrated what an awful person she is.

@DebRoberts22249 @Telegraph @sarahknapton @drpaulclarke Very well said 👏👏 she is showing her true colours. No serious journalist would preemptively block anyone who disagrees with her & write disparaging comments about people far more qualified than her. She is nothing more than a mouthpiece for Letbys PR team.

@markjurgenmayes @DJBandana @Floatymcfloater @JohnyBoat There is no need to be so rude.

@DJBandana @Floatymcfloater @JohnyBoat You're thick as mince. Never shd have been a nurse - which i doubt you were. And likely a shit DJ. GFY

There’s cunts out there who genuinely believe Lucy Letby was some sort of genius murderer who used multiple methods to kill several babies. If you’re still buying this. You’re a danger to society and especially children.

Supporters of nurse serial killer, Lucy Letby, like to parrot the “expert” panel who declared she hadn’t committed any murders. But, as Cindy and I explain, the numerous errors in the panel’s reports mean their conclusions are invalid. youtu.be/-tSG9P_Qc40

@borthygirl @JeremyVineOn5 @mikeparry8 @StormHuntley Documented where? What is your source? Letby never gave this as an explanation in her police interviews or under cross examination at her trial. It is yet another lie created and spread by her defenders.

@tee11xy @JeremyVineOn5 @mikeparry8 @StormHuntley Actually you may want to check your facts because the notes were part of her counselling,It's well documented.

"I'm finding it really hard to change my mind, but there are two points that made me sit up." 📞 David says the Netflix documentary on the investigation of Lucy Letby has made him question the guilty verdict. @mikeparry8 | @StormHuntley | Alexis Conran | #StormandAlexis

@JeremyVineOn5 @mikeparry8 @cherryhealey @StormHuntley Well said @mikeparry8 the evidence in its entirety is damning. Shoo Lee gave evidence at the coa and it was rejected.

"Because it's a complex case, people are picking on little bits of it." @mikeparry8 says he has "no doubt" that Lucy Letby is guilty of the crimes for which she has been convicted. @cherryhealey | @StormHuntley | Alexis Conran | #StormandAlexis

@MartinMcAvoy_ @PaulBut38752753 @MarshallJarman @ClarkeMicah She was 1 of the least qualified nurses on unit. She was only band 5 & wasn't always assigned the sickest babies. She was angry when she was assigned babies outside of nursery 1 & was eventually banned from working in nursery 1 due to being associated with so many collapses.

As I have already explained to you Paul, Lucy Letby worked more shifts that other nurses and was one of only two on the unit who had advanced neonatal qualifications. She was always likely to be assigned the sickest babies on a ward that only dealt with critical cases. At the times of the deaths, initial coronial findings listed causes as natural, unknown, or undetermined. There was no suspicion of murder, because there was no evidence of foul play. In July 2016, Lucy Letby was removed from direct clinical duties but the unit was also downgrades and stopped treating the most serous neonatal cases. The case is complex but Lucy's defence was not helped by her barrister, calling only one professional during the trial, not the parade of doctors the prosecution called - but the hospital plumber! I don't blame the jury for finding her guilty. But her next appeal will be presented with world class medical professionals who are outraged at the conviction. You don't seem to be happy reading long posts, so you may struggle with Rachel Aviv's 2024 article in the New Yorker but it helped convince me that a terrible miscarriage of justice has occurred. #LucyLetby archive.ph/AWpyz

Letby police ignored other baby deaths on unit telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/02/0…

Why didn't McDonald send Shoo Lee the images showing air embolism in Baby A?

@NadineDorries @GMB Absolute rubbish. She only had 3 years experience as a qualified nurse and was band 5, the lowest level for qualified nurse. There were several band 6 and 7 nurses on the unit . If you genuinely believed she was innocent, you wouldn't tell lies.

On ⁦@GMB⁩ this morning …

@Marymungom87371 @NeoDoc11 You're wrong, you don't know anything about Me. Deb knows the facts of the case and corrects anybody who tries tto distort the facts to this innocence fraud agenda.

@tee11xy @NeoDoc11 She’s an admin worker, how on earth could she be informed with no medical knowledge or experience. Also, look through her comments, it’s quite clear she harasses & bullies experts on a daily basis. I’m afraid you’re one of the uneducated that Dr Dimitrova referred to.

This lady has no relevant expertise and no meaningful audience. Her writing is best described as spreading misinformation although it can seem plausible to the uneducated - similarly to the scientist who was initially involved in the case on the “pro Letby side” who caused a lot of harm also by spreading misinformation. There are multiple accounts who continue to do this on both sides. This lady is just one of them and happens to be on the anti-Letby side. At first, this really irritated me, but after looking into other high-profile criminal cases and the related social media behaviour, it became clear that this is what happens in high profile cases. It follows a pattern of accounts spreading misinformation and then moving onto harassing victims or the experts who speak up for them, inciting violence etc etc. The case I read that affected me the most was the Watts family murders - seeing how online trolls (my term for people who behave as described above) treated the loved ones of the murdered Shanann Watts and her beautiful children, Bella and Celeste, was truly shocking. Compared to that, people like Deb Roberts seem almost virtuous. Although she’s clearly a bully, most of her efforts have been directed at people who have suffered no real impact from her behaviour. In other words, she hasn’t managed to cause any tangible harm - though arguably not for lack of trying. I blocked her quite some time ago due to her behaviour towards me. In the modern world I don’t think there are any repercussions for people who behave like this unless one wants to spend a lot of their time and money on it. Which I don’t. 🤷🏼‍♀️ On a more humorous note - she appears to now be writing “articles”. This isn’t the “journalist” Dr Evans suggested you look into, is it, Phil? @drphilhammond Surely even Dr Evans wouldn’t stoop this low - but then again, he has surprised me before. 🤷🏼‍♀️ Still, it’s worth asking, because if that was the journalist he referred to in your comms, the CCRC @ccrcupdate would no doubt appreciate further evidence of Dr Evans’ capacity for sound, evidence-based judgement… in this case of “journalism”. @PeterElston1 @Michelehal7344 @MartynPitman @Voice4theDead

@DebRoberts22249 @guyrowlanduk Let's hope the harassment endured by the whistleblowers in the Letby case doesnt set a terrifying precedent, where healthcare professionals are too afraid to raise concerns when they suspect deliberate harm due to fear of harassment and abuse by deranged individuals.

@guyrowlanduk You are a load of sad, delusional bullies, pond life.

Blimey. See quoted post. David Davis MP has asked Cheshire Police to investigate Dr Ravi Jayaram for perjury after it emerged his testimony in court against Lucy Letby was contradicted in a 2017 email. In 2023 he was praised in the House Of Commons as a whistleblower. (1/2)

@SamuelBiagetti @rosiew5 Yes but it could have been used at the appeal by the defence but they deemed it irrelevant. Therefore if doesn't make any difference.

@tee11xy @rosiew5 This was not available before either trial, which was your initial question.

Very interesting debate about difference "between beyond reasonable doubt" and "satisfied you are sure". Point is. Convictions of Lucy Letby are undeniably unsafe, given new evidence which has emerged since trials, which the juries and judges did not see. CCRC must refer to CoA

@SamuelBiagetti @rosiew5 Baby K's appeal was in October 2024, that is after September 2024. You have just confirmed I was correct.

@tee11xy @rosiew5 No it was not. It was only disclosed in Sept. 2024. Get your facts straight. unherd.com/newsroom/hidde…