E

@mellycatslave Enjoy being wrong 👍

@HE0776 Enjoy the banality. Night. Xxx

I’m picking up the blocks among the conspiracy nuts like #letby did with convictions… As ever, it’s the only tool in the armoury when they can’t get you to agree with their lunacy.

@mellycatslave I’ve never said you’re not. But I and others are entitled to challenge and call out lies when they are spoken

@HE0776 You’re entitled to your opinion, the same as we are. 🤷🏼‍♀️ I feel desperately sad for the parents, if they’ve been used as pawns, and manipulated. That is unforgivable. Xxx

@mellycatslave You’ve already asked me this. And I’ve already told you.

@HE0776 Even if you think we misunderstand. Why do you concern yourself, with opposite opinions? Your objective has been achieved. She’s in prison. 🤷🏼‍♀️ Xxx

@mellycatslave I don’t doubt the strength of feeling among the Letbyists, but I contend at best it is misguided, at worst pushed by people with a desire to have an edgy opinion or jump on a bandwagon. The parents have told people like you to stop pushing conspiracy. If you have evidence show it

@HE0776 Politely, the circumstantial trial evidence, has been debunked by the science, from those who know better. There is nothing of substance anymore. 🤷🏼‍♀️ Even if you don’t agree, you must understand why others see this, as a really serious issue? Xxx

@RichyOwen_ 👍 good stuff. It’s hard to tell sometimes with the amount of crazies out there.

@HE0776 Tbh mate I was being sarcastic. And tb more honest I think she should of been put in a carrier bag.

Netflix got me thinking Lucy Letby is innocent

@mellycatslave Feelings do not replace evidence and Hitchens is a case in point about jumping on the back of this case without understanding the evidence and deliberately pushing debunked theories.

@HE0776 Hitchens is expressing his opinion, nothing more. It’s become abundantly clear, there are definite questions over the convictions. I’m not being rude, when I say. Can you genuinely not understand why some feel this is now very wrong? Xxx

@Alex_B_2002 @JohnMcG02596026 @SpringFord14 @AngelaMM123 I bet you felt very clever writing all that out didn’t you? And after all that none of what you have written applies to my tweet 😂

@HE0776 @JohnMcG02596026 @SpringFord14 @AngelaMM123 . ❌Your post was found to contain the following fallacies: -Appeal to authority (blind faith in jury verdict), -Appeal to quantity/effort (pretending more = true), -Straw man (reframes argument against jurors personally), -Ad hominem (calling the poster 'arrogant' and 'stupid')

It seems the justice system has been unfair to Lucy Letby in so many ways during the police investigation and her trial. All I hope is that her appeal will be met with fairness, and the new evidence judged by people with unbiased minds. Hope that's not too much to ask. #LucyLetby

@mellycatslave Just read Hitchens tweets for a start. Plus all the wilfull misinterpretation within newspaper articles like the New Yorker and guardian.

@HE0776 So just your supposition? Nothing to quantify, that anyone is deliberately trying to deceive anyone? Xxx

@mellycatslave £££, column inches, attention.

@HE0776 Why do you think it’s for nefarious reasons though? What does anyone have to gain from defending a “serial killer”? Xxx

@mellycatslave Prominent journalists, politicians, infamous American commentators, other assorted grifters and of course the legion of middle aged men who can’t believe someone like her could be guilty

@HE0776 Hi… Who is pushing conspiracy for nefarious reasons? I haven’t seen that. Xxx

@JohnMcG02596026 @SpringFord14 @AngelaMM123 She was. By two independent juries. Go and tell them - they who sat through nearly a year’s work of evidence - that they are biased and dishonest. The arrogance of your stupidity would be laughable if it wasn’t so serious a case.

@AngelaMM123 Lucy Letby deserves to be judged by people with unbiased and honest minds. The truth will then be seen. And not as she was judged by people who were lying charlatans like Dr Dewi Evan’s. Who wasn’t even qualified to judge the evidence. Appalling miscarriage of justice.

@mellycatslave Because a lot of the people who ‘feel differently’ are pushing conspiracy theories for nefarious reasons at the expense of murdered children. I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sit right with me.

@HE0776 Who needs to agree. Your wish is granted. She’s locked up for life. Why waste your time, with others that feel differently. 🤷🏼‍♀️ Xxx

@JayneArkle22617 What are you sharing this nonsense with me? Do you honestly think I care - or that it has any bearing on her evident guilt - that Dan Wootton and Jeremy Hunt think differently?

@JayneArkle22617 Well, I mean if Dan Wootton believes she’s innocent, then that’s the end of the debate isn’t it. 😂 😂 😂 - you think this proves anything?

@newstart_2024 @johndefeo One of the first things the guardian did when Viner took over was to obliterate the ‘Comment is Free’ section where commentators under the line were often more informed than the writer above. The narrative became all important and could brook no challenge.

The moment the West decided evidence no longer mattered — if it got in the way of utopia. Melanie Phillips (former Guardian journalist): “Objective evidence was cast aside because it was too inconvenient. The very idea of reason and rationality was dismissed. All these ideologies — multiculturalism, lifestyle choice, deep green environmentalism, moral relativism — were utopian. They promised perfection. Anyone who brought facts against them wasn’t just wrong… they were evil.” Result? - Evidence became “right-wing” - Dissenters were bullied, ostracized, fired, threatened - The Guardian itself became the heart of this ideological machine… until she fell foul of it. When ideology is sacrosanct and the world must be perfected, facts become the enemy — and truth-tellers become heretics. Have you watched this shift in real time — where inconvenient evidence gets labeled “hate” or “misinformation”? Which sacred ideology do you think has done the most damage to open debate? Your honest take 👇

@UKinjustice2025 Go ahead - it’s what you conspiracy nuts do best when challenged. You’ll be in good company. Still, hopefully blocking me might lessen your meltdown

@HE0776 Grow up. Provide the facts or troll somewhere else. I couldn't be bothered dealing with yet another Troll on here today. You're all pathetic. Reply again without providing facts and I'll block you

The #LucyLetby miscarriage of justice has gone on long enough. It's time the government stepped in, condemned it and ordered her immediate exoneration and release. Nobody is fooled by the "We cannot interfere - courts are independent" nonsense. The government are quick to interfere in foreign injustice. One rule for criticising China's regime protection. gov.uk/government/new… Another for shielding the NHS. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n… There were NO murders. There were NO attempted murders. Just natural causes or BAD MEDICAL CARE. "I would say that if this was a hospital in Canada, it would be shut down" Professor Shoo Lee This travesty will never be forgotten and never be forgiven. Allowing it to continue for even one more day is utterly shameful. @YvetteCooperMP @wesstreeting @DavidLammy @DavidDavisMP @AllisonPearson @JuliaHB1 @GoodwinMJ @EmpowerInnocent @ #JusticeForLucyLetby #NHSscandal #FreeLucyLetby

@UKinjustice2025 Haha, you’re arguing like a toddler, which I admit could be possible in this case. Basic research can be found within the trials, no matter how much your hissy fit

Showing your true Troll colours now with your pathetic attempts at insults. I can do the same. If you've done your research as you claim then that is irrefutable proof that it is in fact you who is dim witted. Anyone with half a functioning brain cell who has done even basic research knows she's innocent. Go troll elsewhere.