Telescope Finance

WE ARE NOW TELESCOPE! In January, we deprecated LobbyFi. While the protocol functioned exactly as designed, operating it exposed a structural flaw in DeFi: pure governance tokens are unproductive capital. You cannot effectively financialise an asset that lacks intrinsic economic gravity. The era of the zero-yield governance token is ending. Vote-escrow models solve this capital inefficiency by directly linking long-term liquidity commitments with verifiable protocol revenue. Influence in these systems is backed by continuous cash flows. Today, we rebrand to Telescope. Our focus has shifted to optimising capital efficiency across vote-escrow economies. We are building symbiotic liquid wrappers, beginning with the $AERO ecosystem on Base. Our architecture is structurally aligned with the protocols it supports. Instead of fragmenting governance, our infrastructure unlocks utility for locked positions while directly reinforcing the ecosystem's baseline economic security. We are moving away from abstract influence markets to focus on quantifiable, cash-flowing assets. Details to follow.

LobbyFi v1 deprecation. The DAO environment evolved throughout 2025. LobbyFi must adapt. The current frontend was replaced by a simplified interface for a limited time. This portal will serve one purpose: enabling the withdrawal of unsettled rewards and unused bids. If you have assets remaining in the protocol, we advise retrieving them in a timely manner. lobbyfi.xyz We have proven that voting power can be financialised in a trustless and transparent manner. This iteration ends, but the thesis remains. More s00n.

@romthpt funny that you had 2 friends to jump in for you right away after you were banned

just been banned from @lobbyfinance tg for correcting a tiny error in the docs, project looks cool it's a shame they're retarded 🙃

@coinflipcanada @SnapshotLabs no bae I am not crying, just got some clear guidelines about vote ratification in my eye

@lobbyfinance was not outlawed, quite the contrary. Clear guidelines were placed so that if Lobbyfi's vote was deterministic in the election, a ratification vote can happen automatically rather than a long and inconclusive forum debate on legitimacy. Votes count, confusion is avoided, actual work continues.

One of the biggest shielded vote elections ever, for the @arbitrum DAO AGV Council, ends in less than 8 hours. Who do you think is going to be elected? @gregcanessa @jojothecow @CocoraEth @ImperiumPaper from @labsGFX @tekr0x @coinflipcanada

@pwyszomirski if you'd update ur numbers you'd wonder how large of a sleeping giant we became brian johnson cannot comprehend

16,160,000 $ARB Voting Power. 30-Day Participation: 0.0%. Fatigue Score: 100/100 🚨 @LobbyFi — your delegate mandate claims "against by default" logic when users are inactive. My script flagged 0x7a...2D26 as a critical anomaly. On-chain reality shows absolute silence, not "Against" votes. Is the mechanism broken? I'm visualizing this "Sleeping Giant" risk in my upcoming report. Clarification would be appreciated.

@theZeugh @divine_economy yeah.

@divine_economy at least @lobbyfinance lets you see the value at it you know

i honestly care less about the fact that solana paid western union than the fact that they won't share how much (and this goes for everyone else who's bribed users too) it's bad faith to make your users be financially transparent on your chain while you are not

Worth a read. @blockful/arbitrum-security-council" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">paragraph.com/@blockful/arbi…

@A_Leutenegger @coinbase @base Missing launches on Aerodrome here.

Bullish. I have nothing else to say. @coinbase @base

@paulofonseca @post_polar_ @arbitrum @blockful_io *yet*

@post_polar_ @arbitrum @blockful_io @lobbyfinance you can buy votes on any onchain proposal through @lobbyfinance and they actually are the 3rd biggest delegate in @arbitrum and used to the biggest one last february

one seat in the @arbitrum security council was just bought by @blockful_io for ~5,400 USD via @lobbyfinance to... prove a point basically!

@Rozengarden_eth @PokemonENS get them one

@lobbyfinance they don't seems to have a @PokemonENS

<insert your condemnation and concern here>

@0xDonPepe @blockful_io @arbitrum We respect that you've been consistent with this view.

Re: Vote Buying Services @blockful_io @arbitrum @lobbyfinance

gm

@eldarcap @0xdefiwizard @eulerfinance @0xfluid Taking delegations but not selling voting power since there is little to no delegated voting power and/or there are no relevant proposals where we think we can generate yield on that VP.

@lobbyfinance @0xdefiwizard @eulerfinance @0xfluid What does softly mean here?

Is there any yield venue to park my $FLUID and $EUL bags onchain? For $EUL, I know only about lending it via @eulerfinance Eulerswap, which currently yields 1.25%. Wondering if there were any known options. For @0xfluid, I don't know any yield option for $FLUID yet. Does anybody know any?

@0xdefiwizard @eldarcap @eulerfinance @0xfluid We (softly) support $EUL delegations but do not support $FLUID yet. If there is real demand, we would add it.

@eldarcap @eulerfinance @0xfluid probably not a thing for $FLUID as of right now, but with @lobbyfinance you can rent out your gov tokens to voters who pay you yield in exchange for gov power

@raphbaph hello

DAO delegates should rebrand as proxy voters. Much more 2026.

@newmichwill Not sure about BTC but likely good for YB.

Is it good for Bitcoin?

@web3tokenomics @worldlibertyfi @justinsuntron Hold my beer.

@lobbyfinance @worldlibertyfi @justinsuntron would be a great client 😂

LobbyFi just added support for the @worldlibertyfi. So what? $WLFI token holders can now delegate their voting power to LobbyFi and earn yield passively. Let LobbyFi lobby for you! Let's see how @worldlibertyfi evolves as a DAO, there are already a lot of hot proposals on the forum 🔥