ShaftMaster69

@pfau /s

I just wrote a novel that is word-for-word identical to Don Quixote. Please describe, in as much detail as possible, what makes this inferior to a real Cervantes novel.

@tugce190333 11

Kaç renk görüyorsun???? Ben 4 tane görüyorum

@nonregemesse yeah duhhh

Doesn’t seem like an unreasonable expectation

you definitely still need a coder here and there, but that coder with AI can work for 5/6 coders (random number) worth. for sure. generally I apply the "am I maybe even unconsciously artificially making myself valuable, or am I actually valuable?" to find out if some of my job or all of it can be replaceable by AI.

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer I gotcha, I was specifically referring to the old coding fear of automating oneself out of their role. That if their code is too clean and too well documented, that someone else could do their job for less. I suppose the same would apply for an AI.

In this thread: not a single AI bro can give a concrete example of how one could get left behind.

uhh that's hard to answer but as of now as long as the person behind the AI automation knows what they're doing, they're so beyond the definition of "worth it" there's no comparison. to reach the realm of "human-run tasks are worth it again" there would really be some kind of dramatic event that influences costs and / or a market crash of some kind (hardware related probably). again, this applies to some industries more than others

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer Third, it's my understanding that the majority of AI models available online for professional work are either subscription-based or token-based. If the price increased substantially, do you believe that there is an inflection point where human effort is more economically viable?

absolutely but the Q threshold for validity is too dependable on the industry so we can't make "Q is too important so the rule is disproven" as generalized statement. I think my original statement applies more or less heavily in most industries. Without accounting the fact that what Q is is ultimately a qualitative evaluation therefore hard to measure

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer Second, I believe the values for Q matter in certain instances, usually where licensure is involved. If I work as a pharmacist, 0.7Q may give a wrong dosage and kill a person. And verification of such may take enough time to bring T back up to near human levels. Do you agree?

if the resource (employee) refuses or is unable to adapt AI tools that the company suggests and / or pays training for, in order to enhance their output either in value or time, yea I think it makes sense as a decision. Note: I'm not giving a moral standpoint just a "will it happen or not, considering how a company operates". And btw all of this is not theorizing, I work in marketing with close connections to construction and fashion businesses, and I see it happen the same way everywhere, every time.

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer Thank you, very clear. Apologies for bluntness. A couple questions if you would oblige. Do you believe that the methods used to produce 1X, which would be owned by the company, could be used to justify one's dismissal? If the method is replicable, anyone could prompt it.

@TheOmniLiberal the fact that you take satisfaction in making your opponent mad is just the ultimate proof you're a 3rd rate "debater" and you belong in your social media engagement-baiting bubble

Watch me make Jordan Peterson pop a blood vessel

@WuWa_Verse1 @grok where is Verina in this picture

Welcome to Mengzhou! (Unofficial Art) -Via Seele #WutheringWaves

@sonyxperia bruh this post was NOT ready to launch

The new AI Camera Assistant* with Xperia Intelligence brings stories to life. Using subject, scene and weather, it suggests expressive options with adjustments of colour, exposure, bokeh, and lens for breathtaking photos*. sony.co.jp/en/xperia-1m8/… #SonyXperia #Xperia1VIII

@TheRabbitHole mm interesting. Maybe not 1% as I just don't see the same amount of people being equally influential (in a good or bad way), but I think there's something to be explored here

Unpopular Fact: The bottom 1% are a bigger problem than the top 1%.

@SpiderManMovie WHY IS IT NOT CENTERED

The world has forgotten Peter Parker, but he hasn’t forgotten them. #SpiderManBrandNewDay - in theatres July 31.

@DschlopesIsBack there's a lot of them

Reminder that people like this actually exist.

@J111425 @QueenMab87 @kferrDC @rell_aitch sure, like you're the one that can make that impossible calculation that would apply to all use cases everywhere

@theshaftmaster @QueenMab87 @kferrDC @rell_aitch But it’s not

I’ve never quite understood how I’ll get “left behind” if I don’t use AI. I’m perfectly capable of writing, researching, and thinking all on my own. What does it do that will leave me behind?

Naming and making are different things but sure. btw chill, I'm giving you important information for free. OP's initial argument is she doesn't get what people mean when they say "left behind by AI". My explanation is a company is a money making machine. To justify their existence, they need to A. make the most amount of money and B. in the least amount of time. If you're an asset to a company (or even if you're a freelancer), you produce a quantifiable amount of value we're going to call 1X. To produce 1X, you need a quantifiable amount of time we're going to call 1T. When the company assesses your value, they're going to evaluate it in quality / accuracy, we're going to call that 1Q. What AI does is it produces that value in less time and that's why it's going to be more valuable to companies than human resources. Same X, way less T, similar Q. What OP argues repeatedly in the thread is that "yeah sure but it makes more mistakes". Sure let's assume that. Anyone could agree that if AI can produce value 1.000X in the same amount of time 1T, even if quality is evaluated at 0.7Q, or 0.5Q, the obvious choice for the company is still using the AI instead. Of course this brutal way to look at the situation is reductive, but I'm operating in the costraints of OP's original argument. Hope this is satisfactory

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer I asked you specifically to name some. In your own words.

@MarcoFattorini questo nuovo angolo del "mentally disabled" è divertente da leggere. Riesci a vedere chiaramente quando inventano un nuovo angolo, fanno uscire le news a supporto tutti insieme, e il giorno dopo tutti insieme su X a tweettare la stesa cosa. Veramente noiosi

«Trump è malato. È incredibile il fatto che il presidente degli Stati Uniti passi ogni singola notte dalle mezzanotte alle 4 del mattino su Truth Social a postare schifezze generate dall'Intelligenza Artificiale. E per questo sempre più persone invocano il 25° emendamento per riconoscere che è inadatto a governare». (Yassamin Ansari, deputata democratica statunitense)

@RicksportsRick @reset_by_peer

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer Name some

@RicksportsRick @reset_by_peer

@liana_1_1 the famous 2 percenters

It’s crazy how one random person can negatively impact so many other people’s lives