Sporting Ricky

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer For sure. It's my understanding that some industries (like compsci) are incredibly adaptable to AI, since they rely on existing, well-referenced programming languages in a fully digital space. But yeah, for a lot of others, your mileage may vary.

uhh that's hard to answer but as of now as long as the person behind the AI automation knows what they're doing, they're so beyond the definition of "worth it" there's no comparison. to reach the realm of "human-run tasks are worth it again" there would really be some kind of dramatic event that influences costs and / or a market crash of some kind (hardware related probably). again, this applies to some industries more than others

In this thread: not a single AI bro can give a concrete example of how one could get left behind.

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer I gotcha, I was specifically referring to the old coding fear of automating oneself out of their role. That if their code is too clean and too well documented, that someone else could do their job for less. I suppose the same would apply for an AI.

if the resource (employee) refuses or is unable to adapt AI tools that the company suggests and / or pays training for, in order to enhance their output either in value or time, yea I think it makes sense as a decision. Note: I'm not giving a moral standpoint just a "will it happen or not, considering how a company operates". And btw all of this is not theorizing, I work in marketing with close connections to construction and fashion businesses, and I see it happen the same way everywhere, every time.

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer Third, it's my understanding that the majority of AI models available online for professional work are either subscription-based or token-based. If the price increased substantially, do you believe that there is an inflection point where human effort is more economically viable?

Naming and making are different things but sure. btw chill, I'm giving you important information for free. OP's initial argument is she doesn't get what people mean when they say "left behind by AI". My explanation is a company is a money making machine. To justify their existence, they need to A. make the most amount of money and B. in the least amount of time. If you're an asset to a company (or even if you're a freelancer), you produce a quantifiable amount of value we're going to call 1X. To produce 1X, you need a quantifiable amount of time we're going to call 1T. When the company assesses your value, they're going to evaluate it in quality / accuracy, we're going to call that 1Q. What AI does is it produces that value in less time and that's why it's going to be more valuable to companies than human resources. Same X, way less T, similar Q. What OP argues repeatedly in the thread is that "yeah sure but it makes more mistakes". Sure let's assume that. Anyone could agree that if AI can produce value 1.000X in the same amount of time 1T, even if quality is evaluated at 0.7Q, or 0.5Q, the obvious choice for the company is still using the AI instead. Of course this brutal way to look at the situation is reductive, but I'm operating in the costraints of OP's original argument. Hope this is satisfactory

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer Second, I believe the values for Q matter in certain instances, usually where licensure is involved. If I work as a pharmacist, 0.7Q may give a wrong dosage and kill a person. And verification of such may take enough time to bring T back up to near human levels. Do you agree?

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer I asked you specifically to name some. In your own words.

@RicksportsRick @reset_by_peer

@theshaftmaster @reset_by_peer Name some

@reset_by_peer there are dozens of fair explanations actually, but all you AI deniers can do it make a provocative headline, get some likes and convince yourself you're right

@matthewmaddock @wxyzdetroit That's a good thing Matthew

@wxyzdetroit There are about 200 million sport fish in the Great Lakes. The most fishermen catch is about 2 million a year.

🔗: shorturl.at/Cryfs  Five anglers from Northern Michigan were cited for overfishing walleye from the Detroit River last week. The daily limit per angler is 6 walleye, and they had 34 over the limit.

@Just_Jeze @ChrisVanHollen @FBIDirectorKash What are you, a Mormon?

@ChrisVanHollen @FBIDirectorKash Orange Crush in hand, Van Hollen. Delaware lawmakers voted to dub the Orange Crush, orange juice, vodka, triple sec and lemon-lime soda, the state drink.

Yesterday, @FBIDirectorKash told me he'd take the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test if I did. Well, here's mine.   Given all the lies he told yesterday, I imagine he'll fudge the numbers here, but let's see yours, Director Patel.

@AustinHoney30 Ypsi might be the wokest city in Michigan tbqh

Wokest city in Washtenaw County? (There is a right answer)

@esjesjesj This Roman helmet guy sounds like a real dumbass

No fucking way lmao

@GiveMeTheClowns @agitpopcorn lol

@agitpopcorn Yes, we thought we got rid of this dumb bitch, but somehow she came back, she is still out there destroying games and studios We have to destroy her, so there is still work left to do What is the problem?

"We are super mad that we just remembered someone we hate exists, here's our current obsession: they found work!" 15 minute video

@norgrentia42263 @czxxi18 @ghoulhag

@RicksportsRick @czxxi18 @ghoulhag You're too stupid to know if anything is photoshopped or ai... You spend your days watching the fucking Shrek movies....

There was a guy named Dustin who just spawned out nowhere last night telling me he’s American and this is his first time out of the country and he just landed here and I was like… so you came to Birmingham, England?

@norgrentia42263 @czxxi18 @ghoulhag They're drawn on eyebrows, with makeup. You ever see makeup before? You're having quite the sissy fit for no good reason

@RicksportsRick @czxxi18 @ghoulhag You're too stupid to know if anything is photoshopped or ai... You spend your days watching the fucking Shrek movies...

@norgrentia42263 @czxxi18 @ghoulhag It's not even photoshopped you rotting git. You're deranged

@RicksportsRick @czxxi18 @ghoulhag Because it is totally normal to post Shrek and photoshopped dogs as you defend the mass immigration of Indians and Arabs into Britain. Totally normal behavior.

@norgrentia42263 @czxxi18 @ghoulhag Then what you are doing is pretty abnormal eh dummy

@RicksportsRick @czxxi18 @ghoulhag People generally don't cry about ugly dogs...

@norgrentia42263 @czxxi18 @ghoulhag Cry about it

@RicksportsRick @czxxi18 @ghoulhag The most sane and Intelligent looking Account wants to be taken seriously guys...

@norgrentia42263 @czxxi18 @ghoulhag Dumb bendigo wankstain

@czxxi18 @ghoulhag No, she's clearly a native white British person you racist pig.

@HighFuncGaming @nocontextEFC Sick edited mega man sprite with a beard. You wouldn't happen to be a 40+ year old white Gamer would you

@nocontextEFC No, the opposite. Libs on Twitter shout it to the heavens for the virtue signal, but when they run for office they forget to mention it in their ads... I get it. I would be embarrassed admitting it, too. youtu.be/6dMOfwUP0F0?si…

@WorseOfWorst @OfftheDimmadome @urfriendavery_ @Ancomraven2 That'll do pig, that'll do

@RicksportsRick @OfftheDimmadome @urfriendavery_ @Ancomraven2 This one?