Thyrandiel

@epelgrino Si on ajoute que l'interdependance est la meilleure garantie de paix, cela devient magique !

Pour le remplacement de ses AWACS, la 🇨🇵 choisit une solution 🇸🇪 sur étagère alors qu'elle pouvait développer une solution nationale. Pour ses frégates, la 🇸🇪 fait là aussi le choix d'un matériel disponible immédiatement. La défense 🇪🇺 qui marche c'est d'acheter chez son voisin.

La Suède a fait le choix de la frégate de défense et d'intervention de Naval Group pour moderniser sa marine. Je remercie la Suède et je mesure la confiance faite à la France. Après le choix fait par la France de se doter du Global Eye de Saab pour renouveler sa flotte d'avions radar Awacs, c'est une décision stratégique majeure, qui traduit la confiance mutuelle entre nos deux pays. Notre partenariat n’a en effet cessé de se renforcer ces dernières années jusqu’à la participation de la Suède à la dissuasion avancée. Une Europe forte et souveraine au sein de l'OTAN : voilà notre conception de notre défense et de notre sécurité commune. Elle se bâtit chaque jour.

[VIDEO] How the French Navy achieves 80% frigate availability 🇫🇷 The @MarineNationale is maximizing frigate availability through developing its approach to maintenance and operations. Admiral Nicolas Vaujour, the French Navy’s Chief of Staff, previously said that the navy has built up the availability of its ‘first rank’ destroyer and frigate force to 80 percent. In this video recorded at Combined Naval Event 2025, Commander Mathieu, Deputy Director of Technical Division, Fleet Support Services, explains how the French Navy achieves this impressive availability rate. Commander Mathieu also discusses how the new Jacques Chevallier-class / BRF logistics support ships are a revolution in terms of operational logistics for the entire fleet 👇 youtube.com/watch?v=U8232S…

@CaelanEuw @MonsieurYordle Kc a bien un systeme de "legende du club", photo et hommage au cours d'event. Je me dis qu'on peut trouver quelque chose pour ceux qui ont marqué l'aventure.

@thyrandiel @MonsieurYordle Solary a "à peine" 9 ans, c'est encore hyper jeune à l'échelle de ce qui se fait pour du hall of fame en sport, on verra dans quelques années !

Kryze légende du club de la team d'amis ? Bientôt il occupera la première place sur l'ensemble des indicateurs clefs de Solary #SLYWIN

youtu.be/zYPRwW23AuI?is… Rarement vu un clip qui rend aussi bien hommage au sport feminin et à ce que nos sportives doivent surmonter. (Et en plus c'est une simple pub !) Merci @AXA et bien joué Force à vous mesdames !

🇫🇷 "Je propose que, par mesure de sécurité, on coule tous les navires de croisières actuellement en mer et qu'on confine à quai les autres" 🇬🇧 "T'es sûr que ça va régler le problème d'#hantavirus?" 🇫🇷 "D'hantavirus, non, mais de retraites, surement."

Comme beaucoup à Challenges, je suis aujourd’hui en grève, pour la première fois en 24 ans de carrière. Notre actionnaire, LVMH, a dénoncé notre charte d’indépendance, garantie d’une information fiable et non polluée par des pressions externes. Vos soutiens nous seront précieux

J'adore les cris d'orfraie. En substance, dans le cadre du remplacement des vitraux détruits de notre dame, il a été décidé par l'Etat, de remplacer ceux qui avaient été installés au XIXème siècle par Viollet le Duc. Forcément, une petite troupe de conservateurs gueulent.

Le sergent-chef Florian Montorio parachutiste du 17e RGP servant au Liban dans la FINUL a été tué et trois de ses camarades ont été blessés par des tirs directs du Hezbollah contre une patrouille d’ouverture d’itinéraire pour tenter de ravitailler un poste isolé de casques bleus.

L’armée de Terre et ses soldats s’inclinent avec une profonde émotion devant la mémoire du sergent-chef Florian Montorio, qui est allé au bout de son engagement au service de la France au Liban. En lui rendant hommage, ils expriment leur compassion à sa famille et à ses proches. Ils affirment leur solidarité avec les blessés et avec ceux qui poursuivent la mission.

@Qraaal J'ai la perception que la gauche 2020 n'a plus rien à voir avec celle d'il y a 80ans. La FR est l'un des rares pays à ne pas avoir evolué vers des sociodemocrates. Courant qui reconnait l'importance de l'economie. Au lieu de ça on a des zinzin hors sol...

La gauche est devenue tellement abrutie par son hégémonie médiatique et fonctionnaire depuis 85 ans qu'elle conteste même la notion de coût marginal des fonds publics pour la société

@clement_molin The problem is the lack of recognition. At least i remembered some paper citing @escortert and the specialist calling in some osinter name. But yeah for grand media it's free open data, a freelance journalist for 0$. I prefer osint to stay free hoby, but need recognition

This debate is very interesting. It is clear OSINTers are not rewarded enough for the job they are doing. Since I'm doing both OSINT creation and agregation, I can be both critical of the problems and criticized. I would say that the OSINT community is very large and everyone is creating something. Some are geolocating videos, some are following official claims, some are mapping destroyed vehicles, some are following death toles, some are following troops movement... but no one can do everything at the same time, that's a fact. I'm myself doing UA/RU fortification maps, as well as maps of RU artillery and airstrikes. This is a work nobody else is doing. But I don't have the time to do everything else. I'm then using what others do, nearly all the time quoting them and helping sometimes for some work. I chose not to publish those maps (I did it before) for both safety issues and to avoid stealer, because it happened few times. The big problem comes from medias, think tanks and agregators that are just using data created by others as their owns. As long as UA control map or Andrew's map are published online, or other data are publicly shared, you cannot do anything against think tank, intelligence, medias using it, but the problem is that they don't pay for the work or they don't quote the source. A good example is how the french media is following the war in Ukraine. Nearly 80% of what they say about the frontline is a direct quote of ISW (which is not a reliable source), which are directly taking informations from OSINTers, often without understanding it. I often saw some articles in well known journals saying "Several analysts explain that the Russian "slowdown" is due to Ukrainian fortifications". Who are these analysts ? One last thing, 2 months ago, I gave a US media part of my work on fortifications for free. 1 week later, another one asked for the same thing. This time, I was little bit upset because I spent hundred of hours on this and asked for minimal payment, here is their response : "We normally don’t pay for datasets, as our practice is to credit and attribute the source exactly the way they prefer". Yeah okay, we understand !

@AndrewPerpetua Most of the work in anostronomy is done by unpaid people. With their number, the passion of their hobby, they are thousands of eyes looking the sky that cant be match. Pro "use" their work and recognise it. As for me, i value a lot all the work you're doing. So thx

We map an incredible number of events, and it requires an insane amount of work from a group of people to make this possible. Yesterday I was listening to a woman from the ISW talk about how over the course of the past four years their processes have barely adapted. Suspicious. Over the past few years we have had to invest heavily in developing our own tools, adapting methodology, and increasing work efficiency to barely keep up with the exponential rise in footage. We've done this at significant personal expense, with no funding outside of small donations from our users and supporters. Not to mention the tens of thousands of work hours that have gone into collecting, processing, and analyzing the data. Which is often then stolen by aggregators or others so they can lazily synthesize the data for their own purposes, spending 20 minutes vibe coding some dashboard built on top of maps they never bought licenses to, data they stole from others. Or, worse yet, the people who steal data, and then pretend to have collected it themselves. Who go on talks about how their data cannot come from AI because it takes a human touch to analyze the data. Which you then sell commercially to governments or journalists who whoever will buy it. And then when you look under the hood, nearly all of their data is taken from others. And, in most cases, from the team of people producing our map here. But, hey, it took a lot of human effort to personally steal every data point you sell for a profit. And, somehow, the journalists, whose job is to be able to have a brain and understand the most basic things, do not see what is happening. That a middle man is coming through stealing data and then selling it to them. Or maybe it is convenient to the journalist, because other journalists have quoted this middleman so many times that the middleman is now considered some sort of valued source, even though they aren't a source at all. They are an aggregator of other people's work. But, even worse, is that that work they are aggregating IS ALREADY AGGREGATED BY THE CREATORS OF THE WORK. So the aggregation is not even valuable or unique in the first place. Which brings us back to the true hilarity of the situation. Journalists think that sources of information are less valuable than officially recognized aggregators. Let that sink in. Let it stew within you. Journalists think that people who do work, who understand the work, who understands what went into the work and what it means and its limitations are LESS VALUABLE than people who take others people's work, without understanding context, without fully understanding what it means, having to add abstractions and bias and noise. Historically, it was the job of a journalist to seek out sources for the exact reason of getting closer to the truth. Today, journalists avoid them intentionally for the sake of time savings and laziness. What do you think this says about the quality of their work? What do you think the impact is on their work? If you look at the writing, you see the impact clearly. You see bias amplified. You see incorrect information amplified. And, occasionally, when Russian propaganda is quoted as a legitimate source (which these aggregators do regularly btw), you see Russian propaganda accepted as literal fact and injected into the discourse uncritically even by anti-Russian news outlets who rely on these aggregators rather than actual information sources. That is the true result. So, to get back to my original point: It takes an insane amount of work to analyze and map this data.

Horrible. Hard to see this as anything other than retaliation.

@Collabblues Entre ça et un representant IR qui defend le pape, on se demande si on a pas eu de changement de regime au final !

L'ambassade d'🇮🇷 qui reprend Desireless pour se moquer de Trump, c'était pas dans mon bingo 2026 (ou pour n'importe quelle année en fait).

Russia targets France to fracture a nuclear power backing Ukraine. Russia ran 107 disinformation campaigns in 2025. One fake story linking Macron to Epstein hit 1m+ views in hours. France faces elections in 2027, giving attackers a clear political window — The Economist. 1/

en 3 ans on en est à à environ 5500 tués et +18k blessés. mais ce qui caractérise les dernières frappes ce sont les milliers de civils qui sont tués et blessés sans plus aucune retenue de la part du gouv de Netanyahu. un drame sidérant qui devrait générer plus de réactions

People are not angry enough about this.