Timberx
3.5K posts
@notpopbase @risversed Stink and reeks are also adjectives. You’re both morons.
English
@aaronca25084440 @em_Lazzy And after all that, you decided to vote for more of it?
English
Biden went missing for days on end. Worked 9-4 and slept the rest of the time. He hardly did interviews, looked like a dementia patient every single time he actually talked to press. Never did press briefings either. The whole time the libtards told us he was sharp as a tack and up for the task. Lmfao the fake outrage is fucking hilariois.
English
How the fuck does the Director of the FBI go missing? What. The. Fuck.
English
English
English
@CFackering @Dispropoganda @KyleKulinski He was always all of these things, he just has more yes-men around him this time.
English
@Dispropoganda @KyleKulinski If you look at the graph that was true until 2025. I’m not really defending his actions or wealth gain or the increase in corruption. What I’ve noticed is he wasn’t most of the things you guys said he was until you tried to crush him into dust with the power of the state.
English
@Eheroduelist2 @hcorvinNYC @airynne @bumbadum14 “I assume some ballots shouldn’t have been counted with no evidence to support my conclusion.”
- a definitely unintelligent human being
English
@timberx111 @hcorvinNYC @airynne @bumbadum14 “I recounted the ballots that shouldn’t have counted and found my initial count accurate”
-a supposedly intelligent human being
English
You’re totally unreasonable if you think going to sleep and Trump having a super majority, then waking up the day after Election Day and:
- every swing state suddenly froze their counting
- multiple key swing counties had various catastrophic events
- every polling station boarded windows to prevent media oversight
- this fucking graph
Heath Mayo@HeathMayo
“Reasonable minds can disagree about the 2020 election.” No, they can’t. If you think the 2020 election was stolen, you are not a reasonable person. If you make that claim in a court of law and advise your client to act on that fraudulent premise, you should be disbarred.
English
English
@timberx111 @hcorvinNYC @airynne @bumbadum14 It kinda can, doesn't automatically do
That's what a proper investigation would clear up, rather than leaving us retards to argue about ambiguous behavior in data
English
English
So Trump got 13 Americans killed, spent billions of dollars, and gave Iran 20 billion dollars to get a worse deal than Obama?
ART OF THE DEAL!
English
English
@JessicaJinxxx @SusieM414141 You are a retard, this is exactly the same as recording a pov in a public street
English
This DoorDash driver is just finding out he has been banned from picking up deliveries from all the Chop Shop locations because he live-tapes his work for social media. She says he’s been recording their staff, including underage workers. So who is right? Is he covered by the 1A in this instance, or is she right for protecting the employees? Not sure she can legally stop that.
Suzee Q@SusieM414141
Imagine you're just waiting for your food to arrive that you ordered and you see this. This man decides to disrupt an entire restaurant and go on a tirade of destruction, throwing chairs and smashing things. What would you do if you were a patron and he did this to your table? Or if you were the owner of the restaurant? Update in comments below.
English
@Eheroduelist2 @hcorvinNYC @airynne @bumbadum14 It kinda does. But even if you were right, it still doesn’t mean there was automatic cheating.
English
English
@ArizonaRedNeck2 @harryjsisson Trump literally sharted himself in the Oval Office.
English
English
@DaveyProckett @esjesjesj He has paid more taxes than anyone in human history.
English
“Don’t worry about my AI taking your job, the government will make you rich with socialist policies that I have spent millions campaigning against.”
English
@MCP005 @peterkchung @elonmusk Because it’s a large language model, not an AI. It doesn’t think.
All it does is predict the next word.
English
@peterkchung @elonmusk Can someone explain why this question seems to confuse Grok so much? I’m genuinely so confused myself.
English
@marshallpittman @SpecialPuppy1 The electoral college encourages tyranny by minority.
There’s no reason to have two dakotas, but we do, and therefore they each get equal representation in the senate, and a minimum of 3 EC votes each because there was an arbitrary line drawn to divide them.
English
Encouraging citizens to vote is a very good point.
Constructing a system that could potentially disenfranchise them by their state EC representatives not voting the way the state population votes, but instead following the national population, would actually be even more discouraging.
The vote should be carried by the state according to how the citizens of the state voted.
If the EC representatives reallocate their votes according to the *national* election percentages, then they are not representing their state voters, but the nation.
This would distort the vote, hand the decision to more populous states, and disregard the votes of the state's citizens.
Large states would effectively outvote several smaller states, defeating the purpose of the Electoral College.
These "national percentage" mechanisms seek to undermine the constitutional system and dismantle the checks on party power and the guards against democratic majority tyranny.
English
Would supporters of the Electoral College be okay with every state allocating electoral votes proportionally? For example, if Trump won 38% of the vote in California, he’d get about 21 of California’s electoral votes instead of 0. If not, why not?
James Surowiecki@JamesSurowiecki
There's no good civic argument for the electoral college. It was arguably necessary to ensure the ratification of the Constitution, but it's an anti-democratic device that gives some American citizens far more voting power than others, based purely on where they live.
English
@marshallpittman @SpecialPuppy1 Large states already outvote the small states, the electoral college doesn’t prevent that. Small states still get their equal representation in the senate.
A national popular vote means all states matter, as opposed to right now where only the interest of a few swing states do.
English
@WCAngelposting @TheEbonyMaw And I’d rather our tax dollars not be used to murder children halfway around the world, yet here we are.
English
@timberx111 @TheEbonyMaw I'm on the other side of my former progressivism arc. They can live with their impotence and be remebered mostly for their work in convincing people to cut their dicks off while using tax dollars to feed the homeless to their addictions.
English
The ideal Supreme Court would be Clarence Thomas and 8 clones of him.
Remarks@remarks
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas says progressivism is an existential threat to the United States.
English
@kiapita1776 @marshallpittman @SpecialPuppy1 The fact that you can’t answer or engage with what I said demonstrates you don’t actually have an argument.
English
@timberx111 @marshallpittman @SpecialPuppy1 "Why would it be disenfranchising to its own citizens?"
The fact that you have to ask this demonstrates you should not be delving into this subject.
English
@Eheroduelist2 @hcorvinNYC @airynne @bumbadum14 Bro, 2020 was peak mail-in voting. Obviously it’s gonna be an outlier in a lot of ways. This doesn’t automatically mean there was widespread cheating.
English
The problem I have with your assessment is that, even if and when it’s accurate, it does not address the point that we have not seen a graph like this before and didn’t see it in 2024 either- maybe we’re wrong but if the strange counting results are the result of an intrinsic component of the voting process, we should see that play out at varying degrees and intervals thoroughout modern elections, but we don’t
In tandem with the strange and suspicious sounding behavior taking place on Election Day, why is it irrational to be skeptical?
English
@airynne @hcorvinNYC @bumbadum14 Well Trump did spend a significant amount of time demonizing mail-in voting despite not having any problems using it himself.
The graph shows a bump for republicans, too, btw, just obviously not nearly as much as for Dems.
English
Well you are right in that you are not concise. I will be though. I absolutely understand all the reasons for why it could be correct but I’m simply not buying the argument that the later counted votes regardless of location were 90-95% for one candidate. Everytime we see vote count dumps with spikes it’s both graphs jumping by some measure.
English
@marshallpittman @SpecialPuppy1 Why would it be disenfranchising to its own citizens?
A national popular vote election would also give a more of a reason for the minority party in each state to come out and vote.
English
@SpecialPuppy1 States can proportional however they want, according to their own population's vote.
If they award EC votes according to the national popular vote, they are disenfranchising their own citizens.
English
@ArizonaRedNeck2 @harryjsisson Trump literally sharted himself in the Oval Office.
English