timelinejunkie

LATE ANTIQUITY: EARTH AND WATER (Extended Preview)

@tv_koreaX this is ARMA 3

🚨 Breaking: Iran has hit a U.S. F-35 Lightning II fighter jet.

I'm not sure I've ever seen a potential movie cast that had aura but this is it. This is the cast. Keep it in Miami like the show and this movie will bang.

@thesoggyblanket what kinda art do you do?

does anyone know how to make a living as an artist

@BasedSamParker It's almost like he knew she worked for the CIA and had powerful connections that could expand his influence.

One thing (of many) that has bothered me about the Charlie Kirk narrative was his lack of "success" with women. Stay with me here. Charlie Kirk was a 6'5" athlete, with a good intellect & normie-tier politics. Maybe not the best looking guy, but it's not like his cupboard was bare. Women like tall men of influence. He basically spent about 7 years at a single guy hanging around exclusively college kids, becoming the most popular college influencer in America & building real power. The guy was friends with many powerful, rich, connected people. He was the ideal man for legions of women. He should have had girls THROWING themselves at him. He should have had his pick of women. We should have heard stories about who Charlie Kirk was dating. Gossip. Rumors. Etc. He was a certified, bona-fide 20s-something American hero celebrity. But that's not how it all went down. Instead, we heard there were no girlfriends. That he was a virgin until Erika (good for him if true, btw). No sexual encounters, whatsoever—which, if the rumors about many others in TPUSA are to be believed—is extremely anomalous! He was allegedly surrounded by all kinds of people who were sexually active—gay and straight alike! TPUSA is filled with college coeds for its ambassadors. Smart girls, hot girls, motivated girls, calculating girls, politically connected girls, etc. Girls with multiple combinations of those traits. Yet Charlie spurned every single one? Couldn't land even one single girlfriend? Didn't have one fling? Never once got his groove on? Never once succumbed to the horde of women beating down his door? And then, when he did get married at 27, it was to a 32-year old woman. No offense, ladies, but I was once in my 20s. And men in their mid 20s see women in their 30s as ancient. Old as the hills. Washed up. Why marry a 32-year old when you can snag a 22-year old? That's like a 10-year warranty! This is how the vast majority of men in their 20s think. And Charlie had no shortage of access to women in their early 20s. It's weird. And on top of that, the woman he married hadn't been able to maintain a relationship herself into her 30s. That alone is a major red flag for men. Not to mention the many alleged lies she's told. IMO, she lies a lot. About everything. Surely Charlie would have picked up on that. It's really unattractive. People say Charlie had no game. But the "Bob's Burgers" story where he straight up told her he wanted to date her, not hire her, was a total Chad move. I'm sorry, but something about the Charlie Kirk story just isn't adding up for me. I honestly don't know what, but the math ain't mathing. Am I the only one?

It's funny that most AI haters never apply this logic to any other facet of society than art.

@ShadowofEzra Hard

An Iranian soldier is going viral after declaring he is fighting the United States and Israel on behalf of the victims of Epstein Island, claiming their forces are directly targeting the Temple of Baal. The statement came just moments before dozens of missiles were launched. "For the victims of Epstein Island, we target the Temple of Baal."

The modern media/culture world sucks because there's always some dork out there who figures out how to game whatever system they're in and then spill the beans online to other talentless dorks who then try and game it too and then it causes the dorks who made the system to constantly course correct and try and out smart the dorks trying to out smart them. There are far too many people who just see every single facet of life and existence as a game to be beaten and do speed runs through. It's truly the mark of a soulless body destined to be trapped in the mortal realm for all eternity.

As far as average shot length goes it's like a spectrum. On one end you've got Paul Greengrass, in the middle you've got Paul Verrhoven and at the other end you've got Paul Thomas Anderson.

@metaplexmovies PLease stick it out until the end. It will fucking gut you.

I have now started THE SHIELD, the most deliriously early 2000s thing I have ever seen (that was incredible)

@charliebcurran I'm actually kinda mad at how good the quality of this is

If you think AI film can’t be art then explain this.

@bernardtjoy I guess I just wanna know which American films you consider good.

I sometimes believe that people only pretend to like modern American films because they are terrified of the idea that in our period of history there are no longer any good American films.

I keep seeing the question asking how to tell AI slop from AI art. Here's the answer: An artist who adds ai to their toolset is essentially a human gradient boosted model. Your aesthetic is the loss function. Chaos is the input. Each pass corrects the residual. You don't stop until it converges. Most people run one tree and call it done. That's the slop. Let me explain....🧵1/

@walterkirn Because they hang out at the same places. Extreme creativity gets lonely and isolating so you want to meet your peers and you get influenced by them. It's basically what every "scene" is.

One of the puzzles I find myself mulling over -- too often -- is the question of why artistic genius springs up in geographic clusters rather than in some broad, roughly predictable way. So many great musical talents from Seattle all at once? Whatever may be behind this phenomenon, it doesn't seem to operate with AIs, whose outputs don't arrive in this irregular, qualitatively "lumpy" fashion.

I don't get everyone's obsession with this guy.

@francolli I'm trying

@timelinejunkyAI What a time to be alive That first entry of Dall E way back when is a long long way in the rear view Someone out there is gonna make an A.I movie that will set an unattainable bar even for Hollywood. Definitely won't be me but I'm here for it to watch whoever it is

Good morning X. Tell me something positive, productive and motivating.

@francolli Hell yeah! Love to hear it!

@timelinejunkyAI I'm 70% done on a movie, the first time I have done a full script pre start, subtle nods to other movies, planned screenplay & character development up front, Twists and turns, dark humor and a what the hell did I just watch end So happy to be at the stage we can do this now

@ZubyMusic Social media was supposed to be a Media created from our social experience. Everyone's social experience is just staring through their phone. Everyone is bored and boring.

It feels like the overall experience of social media has dropped significantly in the last few months. It's not unique to this platform, but all of the ones I use. Am I alone in this sentiment?

@JohnQuindell @Prolotario1 There's a ton of great ones. I'm more referring to the popular influencer ones. And @Prolotario1 is honestly the best. He's the only one that leaves me any hope for the future.

@timelinejunkyAI FWIW, the conspiracy theorists I've found over time to be consistent, accurate and grounded: Juan O Savin, Gene Decode, Simon Parkes, Kerry Cassidy, Ole Dammegard, Ariel (@prolotario1).

The Conspiracy Theory community has this really big problem. With the rise of so many popular content creators that are talking about them, it inevitably becomes a contest of who can believe the most outlandish shit. And any detraction or disagreement instantly gets you labeled as a fed. There are a lot of really retarded things that conspiracy folks love to push because it makes good content and not because it's remotely feasible or true. Like make your money n all but at some point this shit is going to discredit this type of thinking far more than it already has and imo ppl have worked very hard to get us to this point where Conspiratorial thinking is so popular. The "Erika Kirk talking to Epstein" recording is a perfect example. Zero thought, zero actual analysis just "OMG I MADE UH CONNECTION" So often people are just naming names and being like "isn't that weird?" "hmm isn't that strange?" And offering zero actual explanation, just noticing and then moving on. No matter how many people hide behind the "citizen journalist truther" moniker most of them are just garden variety grifters and you can always tell because they don't have a single conspiracy or subject they're actually an expert in, they're just walking through the buffet cherry picking anything that gets them clicks.

@BrianRoemmele This is fucking great

“Anything new?”