.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social

27.6K posts

.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social banner
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social

.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social

@tomfoster66

🇦🇺Living on Bidjigal land of the Eora Nation. Mostly follow politics, #MMT economics, history, sport #SydneyIsSkyBlue #YNWA at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social

Sydney, New South Wales Katılım Mayıs 2009
1.4K Takip Edilen740 Takipçiler
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social
@deniseshrivell @KristenLock1 I wish him well in this endeavour. However, like all other MP/Sens in Parly, he’s not shown any sign of offering economic policy alternatives that sit outside the neoliberal paradigm. So how much diff could his party offer? I suggest he looks outside the mainstream 4 ideas /1
English
3
0
1
117
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
Warren B. Mosler
Warren B. Mosler@wbmosler·
@DemzDeliver Hopefully not tied to a tax increase.
English
3
1
14
419
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
I want to describe the Middle Passage to you. Not abstractly. Specifically. Enslaved people were loaded onto ships in West Africa at a ratio calculated to maximize profit after accounting for expected deaths in transit. They were chained in holds with roughly eighteen inches of vertical space, unable to sit upright, lying in their own excrement for voyages that lasted between three weeks and three months. Mortality rates on Middle Passage ships averaged between 10 and 20 percent. On some voyages, significantly higher. Historians estimate that between 1.5 and 2 million people died during the crossing, their bodies thrown into the Atlantic. Those who arrived alive were washed, oiled to appear healthy, and sold on docks while buyers examined their teeth and bodies like livestock. You described this system as "not necessarily a nightmare" and compared the labor that followed to picking crops in Africa. I am not going to debate you on the merits of this position. I am going to ask you to read what I just wrote. And then I am going to ask you whether the problem is that you don't know this history, or that you know it and have decided it doesn't change your argument. Because the answer to that question tells us something important. Not about slavery. About you.
Sony Thăng tweet media
Schalk (Siener)@Schalk47087430

@nxt888 Slavery wasn't necessary a nightmare. It was also not a crime. The Indians for instance offered themselves voluntarily into slavery to escape hunger, and the slaves got lodging and food.

English
125
1.5K
4.7K
99K
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
Mike Carlton
Mike Carlton@MikeCarlton01·
This is better…
English
92
1.5K
10.3K
274.7K
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
Big Brain AI
Big Brain AI@realBigBrainAI·
Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?
English
214
522
1.5K
112K
Rossco
Rossco@rossco1304·
@silverex331 At least my NRL team is leading at half time.
Sydney, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
2
0
1
42
Rossco
Rossco@rossco1304·
I really think that there might be a Sydney sub or two needed in the next few minutes. Lolley....
Sydney, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
1
0
2
271
Brendan Slowey
Brendan Slowey@bjslowey·
really poor half, created nothing. hoping we have some different ideas for the 2nd 45mins
English
1
0
8
522
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
𐙚⋆
𐙚⋆@voidwithverses·
“A young man who travels a lot is older than an old man who stays in the village.” -African Proverb-
𐙚⋆ tweet media
English
119
4.7K
26K
326.7K
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
cinesthetic.
cinesthetic.@TheCinesthetic·
The Wizard of Oz turns 87 this year, and back in 1998, critic Rick Polito wrote what might be the greatest one-line TV listing ever for TCM.
cinesthetic. tweet media
English
91
1.2K
6.4K
240.1K
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ
ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ@LePapillonBlu2·
WHO’S WITH ME?? 💙🌎
ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ tweet media
English
485
4.8K
13K
87.5K
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
Prof. Carl Sagan
Prof. Carl Sagan@ProfCarlSagan·
Never confuse education with intelligence, you can have a PhD and still be an idiot. - Richard Feynman
Prof. Carl Sagan tweet media
English
115
1.3K
4K
59.4K
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
Joel Jenkins
Joel Jenkins@boganintel·
Liberal leader Robert Menzies built houses for Australians because even the coalition thought that housing was a human right. Menzies government had a national housing commission that built cheap and affordable housing for Australians. The right wing government of Robert Menzies was more socialist, more progressive and more sovereign thinking than the Anthony Albanese Labor government, who is giving money to private developers to build houses a profit, or raising dead shit policies that put all the pressure on first homebuyers. Helping?
Anthony Albanese@AlboMP

We're helping young Australians like Erin and Harry get their foot in the door with the Housing Australia Future Fund. Because when you work hard and save, you should be able to afford your own home.

English
25
105
328
20.1K
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
David Lindsay
David Lindsay@david_lindsay77·
#PoliticsLive #RachelReeves #WesStreeting: It is impossible for the currency-issuing State to run out of money. Money “lent” to the Treasury by the Bank of England is money “lent” to the State by the State; such “debt” will never be called in, much less will bailiffs be sent round. Call this “the Magic Money Tree” if you will. There is no comparison between running the economy and managing a household budget, or even a business. There is no “national credit card” to “max out”. “Fiscal headroom” is only the gap between the Government’s tax and spending plans and what would be allowed under the fiscal rules that it sets for itself and changes frequently. davidaslindsay.blogspot.com/2026/05/a-weal…
English
0
16
21
452
.\ Tom Foster at tomfoster66 dot bsky dot social retweetledi
David Lindsay
David Lindsay@david_lindsay77·
#Newsnight #bbcqt #Inflation #Unemployment: Margaret Thatcher must never have seen a banknote, since she thought that the State had no money of its own. In reality, the issuing of currency is an act of the State, which is literally the creator of all money. As a sovereign state with its own free-floating, fiat currency, the United Kingdom has as much of that currency as it chooses to issue to itself, with readily available fiscal and monetary means of controlling any inflationary effect, means that therefore need to be under democratic political control. The responsibility of the Government is to ensure the supply of goods and services to be purchased with that currency. davidaslindsay.blogspot.com/2026/05/a-weal…
English
2
15
25
1.8K