
Josh
1.7K posts

Josh
@trad_layman
Catholic, husband, father, Traditional minded Novus Ordo


History repeats itself



Most Protestants reject the Real Presence in the Eucharist as unbiblical. The Didache (~100 AD) teaches it. Ignatius (~110 AD) teaches it. Every Church Father who addressed it before the Reformation taught the same. They reject what the apostles' own students taught.

If you claim to have the priesthood of God, please show me your line of authority.


Facts



Colombia bans 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗜𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀. MPs celebrated in Parliament after the bill was passed.


What’s the most “controversial” Mass take you have?



Ma paroisse demande 50€ pour faire baptiser un enfant sans aucune possibilité de négocier





No Dale, your reading, comprehension and critical thinking skills are very dull. Paul is talking about a small group of men (apostles) e.g. "THEY" and "THEM" are the same persons. He is talking about James, Cephas, John who separated themselves from eating with the gentiles and also caused Barnabas to do the same thing! Regarding Paul mentioning Peter, he was simply stating that God gave Paul the mission to the gentiles and God gave Peter, the mission to the jews. Peter was not there at all but only being spoken of!!! The whole time, Paul was talking about and telling the story of what THEY, THEM (James, Cephas, John) were doing. Here is the title of Galatians chapter 2. Title. "The apostle's preaching was approved of (BY THE OTHER APOSTLES). The Gentiles were not to be constrained to the observance of the law." Here is Chapter 2 in the proper context of ALL persons being spoken about. 👇👇👇👇👇 Galatians 2:6-14 But of THEM (James, Cephas, John) who seemed to be some thing, what they were some time, it is nothing to me, God accepteth not the person of man, for to me THEY (James, Cephas, John) that seemed to be some thing added nothing. But contrariwise, when THEY (James, Cephas, John) had seen that to me was committed the gospel of the uncircumcision, as to (Peter) was that of the circumcision. (For he who wrought in (Peter) to the apostleship of the circumcision, wrought in me also among the Gentiles.) And when (THEY) had known the grace that was given to me, (James and Cephas and John), who seemed to be pillars, gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship: that we should go unto the Gentiles, and THEY (James, Cephas, John) unto the circumcision: Only that we should be mindful of the poor: which same thing also I was careful to do. But when (CEPHAS) was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. For before that some came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when THEY (James, Cephas, John) were come, CEPHAS withdrew and separated himself, fearing them who were of the circumcision. And to his dissimulation the rest of the Jews consented, so that (Barnabas) also was led by THEM (James, Cephas, John) into that dissimulation. But when I saw that THEY (James, Cephas, John, Barnabas) walked not uprightly unto the truth of the gospel, I said to CEPHAS before them ALL (James, Cephas, John and Barnabas): If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of the Gentiles, and not as the Jews do, how dost THOU (James, Cephas, John) compel the Gentiles to live (as do the Jews)? We by nature are Jews, and not of the Gentiles sinners. endtimes.video/galatians-2-pa…


This keeps getting worse and worse. Though sadly, there are parishes like this. :/












