traderage

94 posts

traderage

traderage

@trade_rage

CyberShaman, BotFather, Degen

Metaverse Katılım Haziran 2018
1.1K Takip Edilen125 Takipçiler
CBB
CBB@Cbb0fe·
If you are willing to hunt this dude with size, drop a DM, setting up a team right now and already got good size.
MLM@mlmabc

A unknown entity shorted a total of 1,677,529 HYPE ($51.65M) over the past few days at an average price of 34.2087 across 54 different wallets, with a liquidation price just 12% above the current price at 34.6703. This entity also helped cause the 9% liquidation wick on November 9th. They really tried to hide it, but I saw a big move in shorts and found the cluster. Not sure if it’s related, but during the dump from 39 → 32 someone (or multiple entities) also shorted a lot of HYPE on Binance - roughly 1.1M HYPE ($30.8M) in open interest was added on Binance during a 10-hour window where price dumped 17%. In that period, funding turned negative for the first time in 3 weeks on Binance. He is doing this on high leverage, has a total of $9M worth of margin in his wallets, and is already up $5.34M UPNL on the shorts. Wallets: 0xf15a43cb262a0d9323e2b8b840636dda1825dc26 0x612cb0b6b1d2b6108386c408f6215df1e2ce15d8 0x7452587376d41f8d90052116482a75ca561e241e 0xd8d6e443ca24c479c8c8adb8baf0debc9b747df5 0x69cc87ec11979ed1214e9a9fd3c4739677b5b1bc 0x05d8273eb23e1aa79e4a3f3634f48d3ff8f8e9b9 0x7d0012509af44062ee56681c0fd704829e366885 0x12ffd55a219080b3f223674fc49b9e28ecd0d352 0x26ad10620558fb3fb57796e35f7f3b97c287c977 0x2d3a04f791a68c2a716e0b13c18eb3c9b02504f2 0xe64d17d0f21538d40d4aee80e18e4a8e5115158d 0x76be609b847d41ef7de3c6e8af7f11b4df09bead 0x817b5f8882ef1ef507690530eba80bfff223aabe 0x628657cdc198447feef280d1cee7637662d6fd64 0x841e13d3c6cffc4bf234932229ef140138254770 0x6a6ef0f1d738e1fc43c9732f6ac4cadefe0d88fe 0x9f44e8f93da96fcc690cd17002c5d53b77e15e5c 0x887e67c2af70e4b661816bd1f95263fc8ab07c40 0xf76ed595cf73ab53b07e62786c864bcc71ca410e 0x4e6065095ddd9928309882319c46bb7c183a0027 0xe46600b0521b4c3da10885848dbf93c5c0fc3646 0x8cc489be2b89bcf3be2ac064b29893facab6f02a 0x51ae8e96fedbbfb5f693af4b496d1b9a499abb79 0x0da01bd8238d766d610815a240e34075fa808e5e 0xd9456000c1d769c3285016ea834d0f4a60ae970e 0xb22fd5cfbb327ded614fa165e9abc6c66f270944 0xb4459901335101c8e13422fd59163d93e7e4a961 0x80048e1c7f6f0bb122787720b1aca32459702670 0xde5f5df0a3374148622eb488c0d2202fc28a8a92 0xc383864b3b220ff4d5434e9473175aacf9143e4a 0x19de35efc945730ee9d3dc3a85745169d81a25c2 0x918c88b3317d0bcccb4e6be4e4141c6d398160d8 0x53fe9045fa8bc2c84fe2625f01e1d941de6e5d85 0x2ffcd043b8c7cbeb498f266a204c6874c05ee4e0 0xbd155c050bcbb5acc08eaea337f12a4250b80c56 0x14507df4dbc09949b946de3f960fb8bb4ecac549 0x17b41f9b863335f089baf2a425674a184ea27699 0x9bd4b3897a8a0f7481d5cf6114e1e9f9462ab6aa 0x6d27fa9accde7c62657dfd8e6a27f9c969a3cb95 0xca8743f7d4aeadb20ac0980365ca12f3f363c1e3 0x372417778e3bada31bdd45e3c730c1255bc60bac 0xde3a0b00e990a3a3bf81646c803550621d8b4c34 0x54539e5db45fb165e6084c0591275cd1ae45a4a4 0xffb8428d394af34095cc0e6b1057a5e33501abeb 0xa7934a8bdac862af60d8e921c92844c1e5603074 0x5739f3b5188a6c3a1a7c804e24325482e6e4a77d 0xad86055b4c86722bca98276ffecc65ce18ae6e05 0x4a6875bfd5158e4c630616690e5ddfb4bcedbfbc 0x390366b73b7ad0f67be9f5fe185744461195d1a1 0x44c3fe524988cb9064d2fc83672ae936b1ab981b 0x6e43827883b41c8d65c05703e597c9c38b1fde8f 0x1d56a3393a4eca4b297b8e35155d3d48e11bfaf5 0xd187b4179a09002069fa6cbdf92f4903e7ba09b2 0x4d44d2e62ad0485be3d1cca03904dc57a8bd3032 I haven’t had time yet to fully check the identity of this person, but it looks like the cluster sent ~$8K Arbitrum USDC to @rektober about a month ago. arbiscan.io/tx/0xf41bc4542… It also links to both a Sol and ETH wallet under the name ‘okwan’: 0xCa8743F7d4AEadb20ac0980365Ca12f3F363C1E3 EP5q9CuZbHQQgnQYQRwrSSrEicNr9SH4b5C5LCJunE6v They also seem to be behind or linked to a token called $WOULD, which ran to a $700M mcap on Solana earlier this year dexscreener.com/solana/hga48qx… What do we think - who’s behind this? For the people saying it’s the team hedging the unlocks: I don’t think that’s the case. They wouldn’t hedge or do it like this, especially not with this kind of leverage and such a tiny margin for error.

English
153
41
1.2K
355.6K
traderage retweetledi
Laura Shin
Laura Shin@laurashin·
How do you build a fast perps DEX on Ethereum’s 12-second block time? ⏱️ @kaiynne's answer: an optimistic order book — off-chain matching, onchain settlement. ⚙️
English
12
16
81
19K
traderage retweetledi
niko
niko@saintniko·
nft strategy is now the *second* most popular uniswap v4 hook by daily volume volume and success aside, its created insane interest around hooks (getting 10~ dms a week from builders since pnkstr launched) no signs of slowing down
niko tweet media
English
41
44
411
28.2K
traderage retweetledi
foogy
foogy@foogyla·
Don't sleep on this metrics @token_works is currently 3rd biggest revenue maker on Ethereum, behind giants Thether and Circle. It's in front of Aave, Lido, Uniswap Labs, Metamask etc. This is being built in the public based on everyday events, the volatility is part of the progress $pnkstr
English
8
29
191
13.2K
traderage retweetledi
Adam
Adam@Rhynotic·
a north star vision for NFTStrategy and $PNKSTR tl;dr - every project needs a strategy. @token_works is building that foundation audits - audits are wrapping up, performed by @0xleastwood. there were no critical findings, but minor fixes and improvements have been applied to new deployments. we’ll publish notes soon and move to deploy new strategies imminently, that will inherit the patched templates by default. safety > speed, always. scheduled projects - starting monday, we’ll ship each of the next five strategies, once every 24 hours, to ensure every community has the spotlight to kick off their strategy. opening the platform - as soon as the next five strategies have launched, there will be five more strategies launching before the platform opens to the market. once these have launched, we'll be immediately moving into an auction-based approach for all new strategies on ethereum. daily auctions will run every 24 hours for new strategy tickers on the platform (ending in STR), along with immediate deployment onto the platform for the following day. mechanics will be purely market-based and procedural, and final details will be announced over the next week. ETH generated from the sale of each ticker / platform slot will be used to market purchase $PNKSTR and burn supply (80% of ETH generated) and distributed to the TokenWorks team for ongoing operation (20% of ETH generated). we believe this is the best way to onboard new strategies while deepening $PNKSTR's role in the platform, and allowing new strategies to breathe. we can and will revisit the timing / sequencing of new strategies with new information. new types of projects - we're grateful for an incredible list of new partners that have reached out about launching strategies with new use cases. some of these include launching NFT projects in tandem with strategies, ERC20 based strategies, and a number of different strategy projects on other chains. every project should have a strategy, and are working hard to bring this to life. as always, $PNKSTR will remain the ecosystem's north star asset. we're also looking to expand our team with the addition of an operations manager. if this is you, or you think you can add value to our team in other ways, please send a resume to inquire@token.works
English
321
311
1.6K
365.9K
traderage retweetledi
TokenWorks™
TokenWorks™@token_works·
TL;DR Everything is safe. All new strategies will be protected. Original eight strategies (minus PunkStrategy which is unaffected) have slight mechanical twist that lends itself to SquiggleStrategy being functionally reworked as 'Day One AB'. Yesterday we found a bug in the 8 deployed NFTStrategy's (not including PunkStrategy which is unaffected). Essentially, there is a complex way of swapping out an NFT owned by the protocol with a different one on the same contract. For all collections other than Squiggles, this seems fine at first if you value the floor NFTs the same. The issue arises when the protocol does not know the NFTs have been switched. So if Bored Ape #2516 was listed at 15e and swapped with Bored Ape #2517 (#2516 is no longer held in the protocol and #2517 is in the protocol), the ape the protocol holds is not listed for sale essentially "bricking" it. This is where it gets interesting. Technically, we can also swap back the NFT into the protocol making it for sale again at the intended price, and taking out one of the "bricked" NFTs. This means at any point in the future, the exploited NFT can be sold by the protocol as intended for the listing price. This essentially creates a sort of "call option" on the NFT. If floor prices ever raise above the listing price a rational trader will swap the exploited NFT back to the protocol, buy the NFT themselves, and take the difference between the price and the current floor. This would release the funds and continue the buy and burn. The only downside we could find from this is if someone finds their "Forever NFT" and wants to hold on this specific token, the ETH will remain in there until then and may never unlock. As for the SquiggleStrategy specifically, this new mechanic means it's now a "Day One AB" strategy, with all 11,012 NFTs on that contract essentially being treated equally. We think this is interesting for two reasons: First, the "Day One" AB trio -- Squiggles (Snowfro), Genesis (DCA), and Construction Token (Jeff Davis) is already a set that many collectors have been collecting, given these three projects launched simultaneously on the first day AB went live. Second, the value of the other two non-Squiggle collections are *much* smaller edition sizes (512 and 500 unique editions respectively), and are only ~30% off the value of an individual Squiggle (10,000 unique editions). More importantly, funds in the protocol are safe. The ERC20 tokens themselves have no issues and the funds will still pool up as intended and buy floors. The ETH held within these NFTs is also safe, albeit can be a delayed release but should eventually make its way back into the LP via buy & burns. These strategy tokens do NOT need to be redeployed. We’ll eventually build a frontend to help users swap the NFTs back (ie. Exercise the call) if they end up with one of the exploited NFTs and help them chug the mechanism along. Future strategy launches are delayed for a few days until we feel the contracts are secure. The 5 planned launches will resume afterwards. Thank you all for the support, and every bump in the road makes us stronger.
English
133
205
1K
154.3K
traderage retweetledi
GoldenBronny
GoldenBronny@GoldenBronny·
I just bought this Meebit out of the NFT Strategy wallet because it was listed UNDER the current floor on the open market Paid 1.129 while the floor on Blur is 1.1369 (splitting hairs, i know) This triggered a buy of the $MEEBSTR token, followed by a burn It also spiked the fees pool enough to turn around and buy another Meebit off the floor on OpenSea The full flywheel in motion
GoldenBronny tweet media
English
26
22
207
12.2K
traderage retweetledi
TokenWorks™
TokenWorks™@token_works·
We've pushed upgrades to the NFTStrategy site in preparation for more launches PunkStrategy now shows on the site as well NFT Capital Markets
TokenWorks™ tweet media
English
67
77
515
31.2K
traderage retweetledi
funghibull
funghibull@funghibull·
Strong 24hrs for Strategies™️ $MEEBSTR, +52%, holding 26 Meebits $BIRBSTR, +35%, close to buying 16th Moonbird $PNKSTR, +34%, close to buying 11th Punk $DICKSTR, +26%, holding 9 Dickbutts $APESTR, +15%, holding 16 BAYC $PUDGYSTR, +12%, holding 8 Pudgy Penguins gg @token_works
funghibull tweet media
English
15
12
160
6.3K
traderage retweetledi
Adam
Adam@Rhynotic·
Fixed the red warning (nftstrategy.fun still has a warning on Twitter). now my twitter account (@token_works) is falsely taken down for impersonation Another fun day building @nikitabier please help before people lose money🙏
Adam tweet mediaAdam tweet media
English
62
53
388
47.9K
traderage retweetledi
cp0x.com
cp0x.com@cp0xdotcom·
From our user (DEFI OG): So fucking tired of these scam crypto platforms. Meet the new – Plume @plumenetwork. Some of you might remember: they took deposits before mainnet. I deposited too. RWA chain blah blah, so at TGE I picked to hold tokens for a boost. In June I checked back, claimed a small part (1/9 total). Main unlock came in August. I tried to claim — got an error: tokens locked. Then on their site everything was blocked “due to jurisdiction.” I was in Europe, my country wasn’t even on the banned list. Looked like an IP bug, figured it would pass. Tried again later, still nothing. Today I contacted support. They tell me I had to register on a brand-new platform to claim, without that, it’s impossible. But deadline already passed. Couple of questions: 1. Where the hell did this “deadline” come from? I already deposited, why should I monitor your side-products? 2. How do I register if your IP detection is broken? Oh wait, I got the answer in support: when blocked for “US users,” their team literally suggests using a VPN. Doesn’t matter if you’re from the US or not. Just use VPN. This shit in crypto is exhausting. A team pretending to be an RWA project, openly telling people to break laws. And of course, the “beautiful deadline” trick: miss it, you lose 85% of your tokens (for me ~100k usd). We all know how this ends. Same old bureaucrat scam model: happily take deposits, but for payouts you need to sing and dance on some new platform with VPN and deadlines. Just fuck off, scammers.
cp0x.com tweet mediacp0x.com tweet mediacp0x.com tweet media
English
7
43
106
3.7K
Dave Wang
Dave Wang@DaveWangMIA·
If you're an investor, you're falling behind if you don't use AI. You can have my 17 page "Investing AI Prompts" ebook for free: • SEC filing analysis • Earnings call sentiment detection • Options flow analysis • Technical pattern recognition (9 key setups) • Macro trend identification (leading indicators) • Risk management frameworks (position sizing) • Insider trading analysis prompts • Supply chain disruption detection • Competitive landscape mapping • Valuation model generators • Sector rotation timing signals • Market sentiment aggregation Comment below and I'll send you my PDF.
Dave Wang tweet media
English
42
4
19
2.6K
traderage retweetledi
Venice
Venice@AskVenice·
This Week in Venice 🌅 We're shipping new features every day, so here's our weekly overview of the daily changelog 🧵
Venice tweet media
English
18
41
184
22K
traderage retweetledi
DEFINITIVE
DEFINITIVE@DefinitiveFi·
Eligibility check is NOW LIVE for Definitive's EDGE airdrop ✅ ONCHAIN TRADOOORS ELIGIBLE If you're actively trading on Definitive, @JupiterExchange, @0xProject, @odosprotocol, @HyperliquidX, @tradewithPhoton, @bullx_io, @bananagun or @DriftProtocol >> CHECK YOUR ELIGIBILITY 🪂 REFER AND EARN +20% MORE EDGE Get MORE EDGE tokens when you refer eligible traders - you'll earn a +20% bonus on their baseline allocated amount of EDGE. ♥️ WE STILL LOVE YOU Not eligible? We still love you. Just create an account, make your first trade on Definitive to be eligible for our Last Chance Drawing. ⏩ CHECK YOUR ELIGIBILITY NOW >> claim./definitive./fi
English
399
3.6K
3.3K
529.4K
traderage retweetledi
cp0x.com
cp0x.com@cp0xdotcom·
Help! I can’t take this abuse anymore. The new hero: AO @aoTheComputer, by the Arweave team @arweaveeco @samecwilliams. And the story of frozen tokens. In June 2024, I started farming tokens of a new project, AO, developed by the Arweave team. I won’t go into why I chose to farm or my opinion on the project—let’s get straight to the details. Farming was simple: deposit ETH (then later DAI), give yield to the project and receive AO tokens on TGE (mainnet, transfers) scheduled for February 2025. The only requirement was to provide an Arweave address where the tokens would be credited—no other restrictions. I hadn’t used the Arweave network before, so I looked for a mobile wallet that supported it. @MathWallet seemed to work. I took an address from there and made a deposit. A few days later, I noticed I couldn’t connect MathWallet to see my earned tokens on AO site. So I picked a wallet recommended by the AO website: arweave(.app). I imported my keyfile from MathWallet into arweave(.app) — everything worked. Now I could see my stake on the AO website. Just to be safe, I bought a small amount of AR tokens, deposited them into my wallet, and tested a withdrawal—everything was fine. So, then there was farming for 8 months. During this time, I occasionally checked the website to see my AO token balance growing. February 2025: Mainnet (Transfers Go Live). I was ready to transfer my tokens. But there was a catch—transfers were only possible from the Wander wallet. Okay, one more wallet—no big deal. I imported my keyfile into Wander… error: “Key Length Too Short.” Tried again—same error. I contacted support, and that’s when I found out that because I generated my address in MathWallet, I was now completely stuck. Support reply: “MathWallet doesn’t generate a key length that works for AO. For AO, the key length needs to be 512 bytes. Keys that aren’t 512 bytes can’t sign AO transactions. We block importing keys that aren’t 512 bytes because if you did import it, send AO or tokens onto AO to that address, you would not be able to transfer it off that address.” Wait… What?! AO’s deposit page never mentioned any restrictions on Arweave addresses (whatever that means—blockchains can be weird). It just needed an address, and the docs didn’t have (and not now) any warnings either. I continued talking to AO support, and here are the exact quotes from our conversation: Q: What’s the issue? AO support: “Unfortunately, we don’t have a way to fix this currently. We have noted this issue, but it’s a problem with how the key is generated for the specific wallet you used to create it, and it isn’t compatible with the AO key standard currently.” Q: What should I do? I followed the instructions on your website. AO support: “This is honestly tough to answer. We are aware of it, but it may take some big changes to accommodate. I will report this to the team, but in the past, we haven’t had a solution for it yet.” Eventually, AO support made it clear that this wasn’t their problem, since they don’t control third-party wallets. As a result, my tokens are permanently frozen. Final: “Unfortunately, we can’t control the different types of wallets created by third parties, or how they support AR. .... This isn’t a mistake on our part.” Reminder: AO = Arweave. So, the devs of Arweave are telling me they have no idea how addresses in their own network are generated? Does that sound believable? The core devs of Arweave don’t know that wallets can have different key security levels? Did they screw up? Or did they just not bother to list the restriction on the AO website? Even now, there are still no warnings in the AO interface, and farming is still active. The trap is still open. Final Takeaway: • I farmed AO tokens and followed all the rules listed on the AO website; • I can see my AO tokens in multiple interfaces on my Arweave address; • My tokens are frozen—I can’t access them because 8 months later from the start of farming, at mainnet launch, I learned that my Arweave address was somehow “wrong” or had a “short key length” (if you dig deeper into the keyfile); • The $40K+ yield I paid to project? Of course, nobody is returning that. I don’t have any demands or requests for the project, because I am completely defenseless. It is clear that this was not done on purpose. Just another huge disappointment.
cp0x.com tweet media
English
8
36
93
3.5K