Logan

@Bot1397642 @sentdefender Love Dolan

What are you guys reading? Tell us in the comments.

@TiffanyFong No

HOWDY, can you see this, mutuals? 🤠

@Bot1397642 We’ve been down this road lol

We the ufo advocates will be the last group of people to be disappointed by Trumр lol

@TheUfoJoe Honored this resonates with someone as experienced in this field as you Joe, thank you! Forward, together.🇺🇸

@SunOfAbramelin @Ice_Alchemist11 @GarryPNolan The truth is coming and they know that. To award amnesty to anyone before the story gets told would be a grave mistake.

You are right, Garry: the great game never stops, and we must play the hand we are dealt. I agree that carefully applied amnesty may be essential both to regaining momentum and to extending mercy to fellow citizens who were deceived, coerced, or drawn into wrongdoing they did not fully understand. The real world is messy, and it is far easier to condemn than to understand. I think we also agree that the limits of amnesty cannot be determined in the dark. Because the crimes of the cover-up have affected all Americans, transparency about what conduct is being forgiven, on what terms, and in exchange for what is essential. As you rightly point out, doing this properly requires understanding the motives at play, and that requires candor. Many of the challenges confronting our national-security enterprise are existential, including those gathered beneath the broad umbrella of UAP and NHI. Once their first- and second-order effects are brought into view, the public may better understand why otherwise “unthinkable” acts were undertaken. Some are defensible when genuinely necessary for national or species survival, others unpardonable when driven by self-interest, profiteering, or collusion.

AMNESTY FOR WHAT? When it comes to Disclosure, the American people are being asked to forgive everything — in exchange for what was theirs all along — for reasons they are not permitted to know. A new essay on UAP disclosure, justice, and reconciliation: sunofabramelin.substack.com/p/on-amnesty

ONE WEEK. 67 SUPPORTERS. MORE THAN $10,000 RAISED. In the first week since the Vanguard Enterprise publicly launched on July 4, 2026, 67 supporters contributed more than $10,000 toward our mission. The response has been both incredible and humbling. Every donation—large or small—brings us closer to building a viable organization capable of supporting whistleblowers when they need it most. We still have a long way to go. Building the necessary infrastructure will require substantial time, talent, and resources. But we are moving in the right direction, and we are deeply grateful to the disclosure community for believing in us. In the weeks and months ahead, we will share more about our plans to help UAP whistleblowers access trusted legal, financial, medical, psychological, and community support. We promise to be transparent and careful stewards of every resource entrusted to us. This is a genuine grassroots effort. It can succeed only with the continued support of people who believe that those who tell the truth should not have to stand alone. Thank you for trusting us. Thank you for believing in this mission. givebutter.com/vanguard-launc…

@FlowersAgainst @frakesineurope Kinky

@frakesineurope I'm gonna reply to your 17 month old tweets and you're gonna like it 😈

I'm gonna reply to your 17 hour old tweets and you're gonna like it

@TheGillisian Perhaps the phenomena reflects back what is in our hearts.

Jay Stratton spent just a single day at Skinwalker Ranch in 2009 yet that one visit was enough to trigger years of sustained haunting phenomena for him and his family. Years.

@VettedPodcast @realDonaldTrump

If he gives the "We are not alone" speech, I will eat a shoe on a Livestream.

This, quite simply, is required reading. It addresses the talk of amnesty for people tied to the UAP legacy program, the criminal retaliation by the federal government and contractors against American citizens and more.

@GoodTroubleShow That is high praise coming from you Matt...thank you!🇺🇸

And if you want my speculation, I’d guess, with low conviction, that Lindsay Graham died of natural causes.

Yeah…nah. Here’s what I think is happening instead. I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories. My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim: The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight. The U.S. hides bioweapons programs. The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs. We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent. We run drugs. The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice. Putin easily kills people outside Russia. We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work. U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases. We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level. There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs Etc. ———— The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence. Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong. After Watergate, Iran-Contra, COVID, Church/Pike committees, etc. these are no longer extraordinary claims to raise. They are ordinary claims. I have no idea whether Lindsay Graham died of natural causes. But I can tell you the difference between a skeptic and a scientist looking at the claim. A skeptic’s first move is to lurch for the budding conspiracy and try to pull the idea of foul play off the table first and then to require a mountain of evidence to consider such a thing. A scientist firmly grabs the skeptic’s hand and forces him to put the hypothesis back on the table and says “Uh, you’re not in charge here. There’s a history…and I’m going to need to see something other than reference to null hypotheses, William of Occam and Carl Sagan…because that’s not how science and investigation works.” Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is. We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.

@morgan88877 @cultigenesis Put some MDMA in all the water supplies. We will figure shit out after a big ol love fest

@cultigenesis Psychedelics will save the world

Millennials will save the world

Congress already possesses witnesses, testimony, and evidence capable of ending the UFO (UAP) coverup. The premise that Congress still needs Legacy Program whistleblowers is false. Congress already had them. Before asking more innocent people to risk their lives, careers, and families, national leaders should fully leverage and protect the first wave of whistleblowers.

The "green fireball mystery" is mentioned in today's release of UFO docs. It is not new. "Project Twinkle" (love that name) obtained by early FOIA pioneers. Here is a key document we reported about back in the late 80s. mysterywire.com/ufo/projecttwi…

My segment on CBS linked below. Key takeaway: Based on publicly available information, we can conclude that the December 2025 incursions in the Southern US were the result of a UAP "luring" operation. Not only was the operation "very successful", it was briefed to a member of the Gang of 8 (Scalise). So the astounding conclusion is not only that the USG knows these objects are real, but also that they have tech / methods with a now proven capability to lure these objects.

Mercy is a virtue. Compassion is a strength. But indiscriminate amnesty is weakness. No deal should unconditionally absolve those responsible for harmful or lethal operations against Americans, lying to Congress, destroying records, obstructing oversight, stealing public funds, or illegally profiting from secrecy.