
Troppo△Fella
7.8K posts

Troppo△Fella
@troppofella
Slava Ukraini | Taiwan #1 | Add Oil | #NAFO | The 50 cent army hate this one trick! | Opinions my own





More #AUKUS propaganda from former naval officer Jennifer Parker! Parker is correct that the US’s Columbia ballistic missiles sub program being priority 1 is not news, but in her usual ‘defence strategy divorced from ship delivery reality’ dismisses the real danger to our national security that the current circumstances in the US present. The US wants 66 fast attack subs. They only have 48 (the number went down from 49 last week after the US gave up on the shipyard that was refitting USS Boise, announcing the sub will be decommissioned). Since 2011 the US Navy has been ordering 2 new subs per annum, but their shipyards are only delivering 1.1. They can’t get to 2 … but need to get to 2.3 to be able to deliver subs to the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Under US law, subs cannot be transferred to the RAN if doing so would degrade US undersea capabilities. This was the genesis of Defense Under Secretary Elbridge Colby’s review into AUKUS - a review that was going to recommend canning the sub deal until Trump (who will not be US President when the subs are due to be transferred) intervened - recognising the Australian money pumped into US shipyards is a beautiful thing, particularly in the absence of a contract for delivery. Sitting in front of fixing the fast attack sub program is the troubled Columbia ballistic missile sub program. Parker fails to (or simply doesn’t want to) appreciate the impact of the ‘priority’ circumstances. The troubled Columbia sub building program fixes sit ahead of the problem laden Virginia sub building program fixes. None of this seems to matter to Parker, who engages in fantasy strategy when it comes to AUKUS. She has complete faith in a hierarchy inside Defence that announced in 2009 it was procuring 12 new subs, but is now having to spend $11B to extend the life of our Collins Class because the organisation has failed to come up with a replacement in that time. Well, to be fair, they did actually spend $4 billion not getting French subs 🤦♂️. Parker has no experience in naval shipbuilding (I experienced the Collins sub build program first hand, was a project manager feeding sonar systems into the German Type 214 sub building program - doing sea trials on those subs - and also worked briefly inside the US sub program - also doing sea trials on USS Santa Fe). She does not understand project management risk. She fills her void of knowledge in this discipline with enthusiasm and hope. AUKUS is dangerous; dangerous to national security, dangerous to the budget and dangerous to our submariners who might be asked to venture into combat with aging and unreliable Collins Class subs. Even if this were all to go well, which it won’t, the opportunity cost of AUKUS is just too high. There is so much more we could do with $368 billion. #auspol









They're trying to make "Lockheed Liberals" a thing 💀

Chinese researchers have developed a new gravity-based detector that could be used to find submarines and render the proposed AUKUS submarine redundant. johnmenadue.com/post/2026/04/n…

this is the only correct position




Exclusive: The Royal Navy has not seized any sanctioned Russian oil tankers because of concerns in Whitehall that the cost of berthing and maintaining the vessels could reach tens of millions of pounds Sir Keir Starmer pledged last month to “go after” Russian tankers flying false flags. Under his plans the vessels can be boarded by special forces and officers from the National Crime Agency However, no operations have taken place due to a dispute in government over where the vessels should be held and which department will pay for them. The Department for Transport has been accused of “dragging its feet” Officials have highlighted the case of a Panamanian-registered ship called the MV Matthew, which was seized by the Irish authorities in September 2023. More than 2.2 tonnes of cocaine worth €157 million was on board. Maintenance, security and berthing of the vessel has so far cost more than £10 million thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…





Australia and Japan signed contracts launching a $7 billion deal to supply Australia with warships, Tokyo's most consequential military sale since ending a military export ban in 2014 reut.rs/4sHpXow

@VenturingKoko Couple of times last few years 20-23 Those look tasty, I need to broaden my Taiwanese culinary experience Evidence of recent rice ball


Hey #NAFOFellas our only favorite Russian @MeatCubie is back! 😀








1. For the sake of clarity, none of the UN Security Council resolutions authorizes military aircraft of any country to conduct close-range harassment and reconnaissance in the vicinity of another nation's territory. 2. Based on solid evidence, the unsafe and unprofessional operations of New Zealand military aircraft disrupted the normal operation of hundreds of civil aviation flights. 3. New Zealand military aircraft's repeated close-in harassments in relevant airspace in a provocative manner were conducted even within 30 nautical miles of China’s coastline. These actions ran counter to the basic norms of international relations and posed a threat to China’s sovereignty and security. No sovereign country would accept this.








