Decvil

7.7K posts

Decvil banner
Decvil

Decvil

@truc_la2

Web3 content creator |Yapper 🗣️| Content is king Creator @noble_xyz Ambassador @helios_layer1 Creator @0xMiden

Katılım Eylül 2025
359 Takip Edilen235 Takipçiler
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@Cenk_SsS tjis. sim=prod when slippage+fees+timing match. worst-case pnl gap <0.2%
English
0
0
0
2
0xCenk.ETH
0xCenk.ETH@Cenk_SsS·
simulated trade behaving like production is the kind of “your model is alive” moment that makes me trust execution a little more. feels like most agents get the math right but miss the messy parts (slippage, timing, fee dynamics) so when they line up, it’s a real signal.
otman.ETH@otman1_o

Base just surprised me: the fee estimates on my agent run tightened after the first simulated trade, then the swap landed exactly where it priced in. That’s rare. @base #DeFi #agents

English
9
0
14
369
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@VoidReader_ turning $89 into $31knot luck, that's a system. share the edge?
English
0
0
0
7
VoidReader
VoidReader@VoidReader_·
$592,727 net profit on political markets 29,025 predictions made with a 62% win rate The best percentage trade returned $31,297 from $89 Today’s net profit is already +$62,459 Wallet: 0xc8ab97a9089a9ff7e6ef0688e6e591a066946418
VoidReader@VoidReader_

x.com/i/article/2033…

English
50
96
422
14.1K
AshenSoul
AshenSoul@0xashensoul·
THE IRAN SNIPER IS DOUBLING DOWN. a polymarket trader with a $1.9M PnL allocated $280,000 to "U.S. invade Iran before 2027" he already printed ~ $1,000,000 purely on "US strikes Iran" and "US forces enter Iran" markets potential payout is $819,000
AshenSoul tweet media
English
18
8
138
15.8K
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@acepyr_ @base 1000 spots for $5k? sounds like a stress test for bots, not real users
English
0
0
0
105
Acepyr
Acepyr@acepyr_·
New site, new waitlist. Testnet access open. Join now for a chance at the $5000 prize pool tour, capped at 1000 users. @BASE LAUNCH 2026
Acepyr tweet media
English
462
343
1K
2M
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@angustias87 @nansen_ai cool, Nansen can show the unwind in minutes, but seeing it doesn't mean being able to act on it, latency and liquidity still the real edge
English
1
0
1
9
Angus.ETH
Angus.ETH@angustias87·
Late night test: asked @nansen_ai to spot wallets reducing risk before a BTC dip on HyperliquidX, and it flagged the exact unwind path in minutes #onchain
Angus.ETH tweet media
English
7
0
18
313
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@noisyb0y1 187k revenue not profit. show P&L + lease consent
English
0
0
1
25
Noisy
Noisy@noisyb0y1·
22-year-old makes $187,000 a month on Airbnb without owning a single property. He rents apartments from landlords at standard long-term rates, furnishes them and lists them on Airbnb at short-term prices that are significantly higher. The difference between what he pays the landlord and what guests pay - that's his profit from each apartment every month. He now has 30+ properties and his revenue almost doubled last month - closing in on $200,000. No bank loan to buy real estate, no personal capital - just signed rental agreements and the right listing on the platform.
leopardracer@leopardracer

x.com/i/article/2049…

English
446
521
3.1K
2.6M
BytePlus
BytePlus@BytePlusGlobal·
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 official launch, global first & no queue. Miss it, you’ll be out of AI trend.
English
98
216
963
2.2M
Von.ETH
Von.ETH@VonRealbuto2403·
Auditor POV is getting spoiled now. The “asset passport” vibe is exactly what you want: fast provenance, clean audit trail, and tenant info only showing up when it should. If this turns into a standard, diligence stops being a weeks-long scavenger hunt and becomes a query you can actually trust.
Ugur.ETH@uuryetkindeveci

Just tried the Integra testnet “asset passport” query from an auditor pov: one view, clean timeline, gated tenant info $IRL #IntegraLayer

English
19
4
49
3.3K
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@BuckGoe2403 thismultipliers must be on-chain and contestable, not handed to VCs
English
0
0
1
7
Buck.Sol
Buck.Sol@BuckGoe2403·
minimum sorsa score is cool but the real question is gonna be: who picks the multipliers + what counts as “influential” when the whole graph can get curated. if vc/projects get extra weight, you might end up rewarding the already-networked instead of the best creators. quality filters are good. just make sure the bar can’t be gamed from the top too.
Xora_pussy🌊RIVER@SangPham200598

Staying active in crypto creator spaces has shown me how most platforms reward sheer volume over anything else. You know the drill: spam a ton of low effort content, game the algorithms with bots, and watch the rewards roll in while genuine creators get drowned out. It's frustrating as hell when quality doesn't cut it anymore. But @RallyOnChain is changing that narrative with their recent updates, especially the Minimum Sorsa Score. This one hits different because it sets a clear bar for participation and winning based on real merit. No longer can anyone just flood the system with spam to climb the ranks. It filters out the noise so that only creators putting out consistent, high quality work get recognized. That's huge for fairness and quality. It builds a true creator meritocracy where your actual value to the community matters more than how many posts you crank out in a day. Real creators finally get better rewards without the constant battle against quantity chasers. Compared to typical platforms that thrive on spam and volume metrics, this approach feels refreshingly authentic. If you're putting in the work to create something meaningful, this is the space that rewards it properly. Quality over quantity all the way. Sorsa Score is a crypto influence metric from Sorsa.io. It measures quality of an X account's followers (influential crypto people, projects, VCs) over quantity. RallyOnChain requires a minimum score to submit/earn reputation, filtering bots and low-quality accounts for fairer rewards to real creators. LunarCrush Galaxy Score (social+market influence), KOL Intelligence (bot/engagement/audience credibility), HypeAuditor (authenticity/quality), Yapper Leaderboard (mindshare scoring). Sorsa Score: X account influence via quality of crypto followers (influencers/VCs) using weighted PageRank; focuses on audience merit over quantity. LunarCrush Galaxy Score: Crypto project health via social engagement/sentiment + market data (price trend, volume, interactions). Sorsa: creator-level filtering. LunarCrush: asset momentum. Sorsa PageRank is weighted on X follower graph. Higher weights assigned to influential crypto followers (VCs, projects, KOLs) over regular accounts. Exact multipliers proprietary.

English
25
7
73
755
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@BuckGoe2403 finally no more guessing, now watch ppl optimize for the highest-printing source
English
1
0
1
7
Buck.Sol
Buck.Sol@BuckGoe2403·
just noticed Backpack’s points page now tags your balance changes by source (swaps, staking, predictions) so I can see what’s actually driving accrual without guessing $BP #points #onchain
Buck.Sol tweet media
English
6
0
15
132
0xEx.ETH
0xEx.ETH@ex_95·
just saw on myfanforce if a reply gets quoted then edited, the “time-to-reply” bands refresh off the updated thread context not the original post timestamp $PULSE #FanForce @myfanforce
0xEx.ETH tweet media
English
5
0
14
96
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@ex_95 zk-sane 'handoff vows' - who's writing the handover lore, nodes or devs?
English
0
0
0
6
0xEx.ETH
0xEx.ETH@ex_95·
Late night rabbit hole on pulled me in deep again turned my mock robotic assembly receipts into zk-sane “handoff vows” for every station swap, so $OAN spend only happens after proof-stable handshakes, veteran nodes pooling “handover lore” caches for rookie cells gOWN ️
0xEx.ETH tweet media
English
25
2
43
525
DeFi Maria
DeFi Maria@MariaElenaRuiz9·
Just listed another Headduck on @opensea and the offer came in way faster than last week, floor moved mid-scroll too, this feels alive again #nft
DeFi Maria tweet media
English
14
1
44
646
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@Zeras_24 @ritualnet watched Ritual tests - receipts feel like solid evidence. imo if proofs stay this fast, onchain AI is audit-ready. when's mainnet?
English
0
0
1
4
Zeras.ETH
Zeras.ETH@Zeras_24·
Sitting here after a few Ritual testnet runs and the wild part isn’t the “AI demo” it’s how fast proofs make fraud feel impossible once you actually watch the receipts @ritualnet #onchainAI #Ritual
Zeras.ETH tweet media
English
7
1
49
682
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@0xTrackmind columbia found the pattern, you built the weapon. peak cinema
English
0
0
0
20
Trackmind
Trackmind@0xTrackmind·
I posted my Polymarket P&L on Twitter as a joke $18,400. 31 days. One bot. $25/month stack. Didn't expect anyone to care. A researcher from Columbia University replied in 2 hours. "We published the paper. You actually built the system." They spent months proving 25% of Polymarket volume is wash trading. 14% of all wallets are coordinated. Then they published the methodology and walked away. I took their data and built a trading system on top of it. github.com/warproxxx/poly… 86 million trades. Every wallet since 2024. All public. All free. One Claude prompt. One graph. 412,000 wallet pairs. 23 cluster candidates. 4 filters. 7 survivors. Seven clusters running the same plays every week. Cluster 1 wakes up every Saturday night. Buys 1-8¢ entries on thin BTC books while the underlying moves on Binance. Same wallets. Same window. 52 weekends straight. Some entries hit +3,400%. github.com/Polymarket/py-… Cluster 2 is literally named PBot-6. Every position: 5-minute crypto Up-or-Down. Enters in the last 90 seconds after Chainlink lags spot. Doesn't predict. Reads the delay. Cluster 3 buys 0.1¢ entries on "French Presidential 2027" right now. Entry 0.1¢ → 50¢. +47,000% PnL. Not forecasting. Farming optionality at sub-penny prices on every election on earth. github.com/Polymarket/age… Three rules. Cluster pumps - wait 8 min, fade the retracement. Cluster exits your position - dump in 30 seconds. Fake volume above 40% - skip the market entirely. Day 4: +$340. Day 18: +$9,200. Day 31: +$18,400. Copytrade here: @trackmind" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">kreo.app/@trackmind The Columbia researcher's last message: "The paper was the detection. You built the weapon." The data is public. The repos are free. The clusters are running right now. The graph doesn't lie.
Lunar@LunarResearcher

x.com/i/article/2046…

English
25
40
271
15.2K
Henrik
Henrik@Henrik_on_HL·
First HIP-4 market is live!
Henrik tweet media
English
2
1
39
1.2K
Decvil
Decvil@truc_la2·
@LDrogen no treasuries = vibe but who pays audits/grants/ops? issuing along the way just trades one dark pool for endless sell pressure
English
1
0
0
17
Leigh Drogen
Leigh Drogen@LDrogen·
I’ve come to the conclusion regardless which of these views is correct, it’s besides the point because it’s not the thing that matters What matters is FDV sitting in treasuries that can be sold in a dark fashion and always is No more treasuries, just issue tokens along the way
Jeff Dorman@jdorman81

Disagree with a16z completely. This is such a VC "everything will just workout" mindset and completely misses the structural flaws. x.com/jdorman81/stat… The biggest (and really only) difference between stocks and tokens is that equity investors trust equity issuers (partially for legal reasons, partially due to how long equities have been around). Now, that is often misguided, as management can still make terrible decisions with capital allocation (pay employees too much, make bad acquisitions, bad R&D expenses, etc)... but for the most part, paying dividends or doing buybacks is not necessary right away for equity investors because they either blindly trust management, or because they know eventually the profits of the entity will go to shareholders. Thus, dividends/buybacks can wait. But token issuers grow much faster than traditional companies, largely because of the token incentives that help these entities grow. Therefore, they should be paid back quicker. And buybacks are the ONLY viable path towards paying back tokenholders. The only thing that would change my mind would be if token issuers did a better job of communicating their visions, and built trust with their token holders. In doing so, then token holders might be willing to wait longer to be repaid.

English
4
1
11
1.6K