turbo (e/acc)

3.3K posts

turbo (e/acc) banner
turbo (e/acc)

turbo (e/acc)

@turbofuch

Turbo Accelerate

Katılım Nisan 2022
1.5K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
turbo (e/acc)
turbo (e/acc)@turbofuch·
I just got to Barcelona. The customs agent asks me, “Do you have more than $20k Euros on your person today?” I tell him, I do. He says “What bag do you have the Euros in and how much do you have?” I hold up my phone. He’s visibly confused. “Sir?” He mutters.
English
179
257
2.3K
796.6K
Jack Kubinec
Jack Kubinec@whosknave·
SCOOP 🚨: Berachain gave its co-lead investor a refund right that is valid for up to a year after BERA's TGE, according to documents obtained by @Unchained_pod. Unchained has published those documents, along with the full story (by me), at the link below. The refund right was granted to Nova Digital — a fund within Brevan Howard Digital — which invested $25M in Berachain's Series B. Now Nova Digital has until February 6, 2026 to require that Berachain return part or all of the money. Nova Digital is also currently being spun out from Brevan Howard, per a source familiar. Four lawyers we spoke to said it was unusual for an investor to be granted a post-TGE refund right. Unlike a typical VC investment, the Brevan fund that backed Berachain wasn't taking on any risk — either BERA would pump, or Nova could ask for its money back. Two other Series B investors who declined to be named said they were not informed that Nova Digital had received a refund right. Now, as the refund right expiration date draws near, BERA is trading at well below the $1.5B FDV at which Nova Digital invested. Perhaps no investor has more at stake in BERA's fate than Framework Ventures, which co-led the Series B with Nova Digital. Unchained has learned that by the end of the second quarter of 2025, Framework had purchased roughly $72.4 million of BERA tokens at an average price of $3.42, meaning Framework would be down more than $50 million on that stash of BERA at current prices. The full story and the documents can be found at the link below.
Jack Kubinec tweet media
English
155
70
798
656.6K
danish
danish@dansquare06·
these sellers got hands
English
3
0
5
413
turbo (e/acc) retweetledi
Jameis Winston
Jameis Winston@Jaboowins·
“The horse is prepared for battle, but victory comes from the Lord.” - Proverbs 21:31
Jameis Winston tweet media
English
2.1K
15.8K
162.6K
14.4M
turbo (e/acc)
turbo (e/acc)@turbofuch·
@dansquare06 “Shields up” corny ass bro thinks he’s in the Avengers or some shit
GIF
English
2
0
6
150
danish
danish@dansquare06·
you either top blast or stay zidelined
English
1
0
3
203
danish
danish@dansquare06·
a white zwan appears
Polski
1
1
3
303
turbo (e/acc)
turbo (e/acc)@turbofuch·
Aster is to Bonkfun as Hyperliquid is to Pumpfun Hyperliquid
English
1
0
4
80
Max Resnick
Max Resnick@MaxResnick·
You realize EIP 7922 that you referenced is based on a paper I co authored? I have forgotten more about the Ethereum protocol than you will ever know.
Max Resnick tweet media
sassal.eth/acc 🦇🔊@sassal0x

Max, I am going to outline this as simple as possible for you because I know you have a really hard time using critical thinking skills. No one is saying that the current Ethereum staking queue dynamics are perfect or not in need of further tuning - they are simply correcting the misinformation that you and others are spreading about the exit queue (why it exists, why it has ballooned out recently, why it shouldn't be tuned just to appease some nation state etc). In the first screenshot here, you are spreading misinformation that I debunked a week ago (x.com/sassal0x/statu…) because I knew people like you would use it to stir up fud about Ethereum. You are all so incredibly predictable. Also, attached is another screenshot from The Daily Gwei Discord server where I argue that the entry/exit queue can indeed be improved by making it faster (and we have EIP-7922 for that already). There's also many other Ethereans, including protocol researchers, arguing for the same thing. I think it'd be best for you to stick with whatever you're doing at Solana - you clearly have very little understanding of Ethereum and also don't seem to care about the truth at all - you are exactly what's wrong with this industry. Delete your account.

English
41
8
264
37K
turbo (e/acc)
turbo (e/acc)@turbofuch·
@tulipking How do you work at Messari and not know how this works by now? They outline clearly they are going to buy both locked and liquid SOL
English
0
0
1
128
Tulip King 🌷
Tulip King 🌷@tulipking·
The DAT is not buying from you on the open market. It’s buying from insiders. Then they’re gonna take these illiquid tokens to the public markets with a vehicle they expect to trade at a premium. To make it explicitly clear, this is immoral and wrong. If you’re involved in this, what you’re doing is wrong. “Providing access to more investors” shouldn’t mean dumping a speculative asset with 0 revenue on the public markets.
Tulip King 🌷 tweet media
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani

0/ Today Forward Industries (@fwdind ) closed on a $1.65B PIPE cosponsored by my firm, @multicoin along with @jump_ and @galaxyhq . 100% USD, no in-kind I am now Chairman of the company In addition to Multicoin's investment, I invested $25M personally into the PIPE

English
27
20
233
51.1K
turbo (e/acc)
turbo (e/acc)@turbofuch·
Who’s the fucking idiot who told me to buy Rivian calls???
English
0
0
2
90
danish
danish@dansquare06·
@turbofuch delete bro, let me fill and stop taking my clout!!
English
1
0
1
54
turbo (e/acc)
turbo (e/acc)@turbofuch·
SOL DATs are to $JTO what ETH DATs are to $LDO x10
English
1
0
0
261