Rachel Edwards

2.4K posts

Rachel Edwards banner
Rachel Edwards

Rachel Edwards

@underthenettle

Fan of economic growth, theatre, spreadsheets, beautiful places, & parties 🪻 Ops/events for @StripePress & @WorksInProgMag 📚

London Katılım Kasım 2012
991 Takip Edilen4.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
Reading The Four Loves by C.S. Lewis and he's just so good. 'Those who do not love the fellow-villagers or fellow-townsmen whom they have seen are not likely to have got very far towards loving 'Man' whom they have not.'
Rachel Edwards tweet media
English
1
2
18
908
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
@Alex__H13 Oh you should definitely read more! He's so great. – Fiction: Till We Have Faces, a retelling of the myth of Cupid and Psyche – Non-fiction: The Four Loves – For children: the Narnia books are in fact really quite good & there are some great audio versions on Audible
English
1
0
1
30
Alex Hunt 🏹
Alex Hunt 🏹@Alex__H13·
@underthenettle I like how he's demonstrating point five for her throughout his response. What do you recommend by Lewis? I've only read The Screw Tape Letters.
English
1
0
0
29
Misha
Misha@mishapathy·
This is sort of embarrassing, but how do single people meet their physical contact needs?
English
2.7K
471
32.8K
7.1M
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
I don't think this poll is that informative here. it's the effort that is distasteful (and the class implications of surgery/filler), not the act of looking good. e.g. if you ask a man if he prefers a woman with a long skincare routine or without, he'll say without – but will still prefer clear skin!
English
0
0
6
44
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
@Sanilac_J it's the most attractive of the horrifying blue people models imo – but only because it looks vaguely real. whatever software she's using can't render curves well e.g. her attempt to create Kardashian-style curves is extremely uncanny
Rachel Edwards tweet media
English
0
0
3
265
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
@Aria_Babu They should be pleased to hear they have niche preferences – good arbitrage opportunity!
English
1
0
6
356
Ryder
Ryder@kurimero2000·
TIL: French unions have designed special barbecues that fit in tram tracks, so they can grill sausages while they march
Ryder tweet media
English
136
1K
10.1K
5.3M
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
@Aria_Babu I still feel bad for the lobster that got released after a PETA campaign and starved to death... Somebody should create another super-lobster and see how big they can go
English
1
1
7
536
Rachel Edwards retweetledi
Aria Schrecker
Aria Schrecker@Aria_Babu·
Human lifespans could get much longer. • Most gains in life expectancy no longer come from saving children. From the 20th century on, most of the increase has come from reducing deaths in middle and old age. • Blue zones aren't real. The longest human lifespans generally come from places with bad records not special diets. • People who live longer usually stay healthy for longer too. Longevity doesn't just mean more years of being old and decrepit. • Pet dogs are now living about a year longer than they did ten years ago. • Some jellyfish can revert back to a baby state under conditions of extreme stress. • Naked mole rats are extremely weird and long-lived. They live in bee or ant-like colonies with one breeding queen and 'socially infertile' workers. Huddling to keep warm, they don't even regulate their body temperature alone. • Lobsters can live for hundreds of years. They never stop growing, getting bigger and bigger until they starve to death. Listen to the latest episode of the Works in Progress podcast. I talk with @bswud and @salonium about super long lived animals, the medical and social successes that have increased lifespans so far, and what new biohacking and medicine might work to help us live even longer. Apple: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/lon… Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/66A5Qr… YouTube: youtube.com/watch?v=jo6M99…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
14
18
117
30.1K
Ralph Stefan Weir
Ralph Stefan Weir@RalphStefanWeir·
For all the commotion about removing historic figures from UK bank notes, we should pause to feel grateful that these are among the few things the state consistently produces to a high aesthetic standard, and adding native flora needn't change that
Ralph Stefan Weir tweet media
English
2
0
11
273
Rachel Edwards retweetledi
Kelsey Piper
Kelsey Piper@KelseyTuoc·
My ancestors buried half their children. All mine are alive. My ancestors' house had a dirt floor. Mine is wood. I have indoor plumbing, I have hot water, I have never in my life hauled a full bucket half a mile and I probably never will. Do you know how rare it is, in human history, for small children to wear shoes? Mine have multiple pairs. I can speak to my relatives who live thousands of miles away, for free, at any time. Video, if we want video. With machine translation, if we speak different languages. The original Library of Congress had 740 books in it. I have more than that. If I run out of books in my home my local public library has 350,000. If I want to take a hundred books with me on vacation, they all fit on a device that fits in my purse. I have heat in the winter and AC in the summer and a washing machine and I have never, ever, ever had to scrub a dress clean by hand in the stream. I can look up recipes from more than a hundred different countries and I've tried dozens of them. I ride a clean and modern train across my city for $4, or take a robot taxi if I'm out too late for the train. I donate $40,000 every year to the cause of getting healthcare to the world's poorest people and even after the donations I never have to think about whether I can afford a book, or a pair of shoes, or a cup of coffee. There is a great deal more to fight for, of course. I hope that our descendants will look back on our lives and list a thousand ways they're richer. Maybe we ourselves will do that, if some of the crazier stuff comes true. But the abundance is all around you and to a significant degree you aren't feeling it only because fish don't notice water.
English
87
848
6.6K
353.7K
Rachel Edwards retweetledi
Kelsey Piper
Kelsey Piper@KelseyTuoc·
I doubt that anyone I know steals from Whole Foods, but the milieu that the article depicted, where it's normal for perfectly well-off people to steal things because why not, was really upsetting to read about, so I actually want to try to earnestly explain why you shouldn't do this just in case there's someone out there who has never had it explained to them. When a business opens - or really, as soon as a business starts making plans to open - a defining question for the business is how it will collect payment for the goods or services it provides. If you trust the people you sell to, you can be pretty relaxed about this; send people an invoice, most of them will pay it on time, any who don't will pay it a bit late. You have to think about convenience and mistakes but not about people trying to cheat you. This saves you so, so much defensive planning to make sure you get paid. It's so much easier. But if you're selling to the general public, you do have to think about people trying to cheat you. You have to structure the physical store so that it's hard for them to steal. You have to not carry some items that you'd like to sell, because they'd also be attractive targets to steal. If people swap price tags between items, you can't use stickers. If people put things on in the dressing room and wear them out, you need to pay someone a full time salary to monitor the dressing room. The world that we all live in is much poorer than the world we'd live in if people didn't steal. The stores don't carry things that they could carry if people didn't steal. They don't use pricing and inventory systems that would be way easier and more convenient if people didn't steal. But it could be much worse! If I walk down to my local Whole Foods today, items on the shelves won't be locked behind sheafs of plastic - that is only worth it when the background rate of stealing is much higher than it is at my local Whole Foods. When more people steal, businesses have to further intensify security, or go out of business. When you shoplift, you directly and unambiguously impoverish your community. You make prices higher for everybody else, you make stores less usable for everybody else, or you make businesses not viable that would otherwise be viable. The direct impact each time is small, but it's a lot larger than the direct impact of taking some trash out of the trash can to throw on the ground, or pouring just a tiny bit of poison into your local river, and most people have a deep, instinctive abhorrence of antisocially wrecking your community like that. So don't steal. The other thing that it seems possible some people might not understand is that while you might have a social circle that is incredibly nihilistic and cynical and thinks that everybody steals, in fact this is not true. Most people do not steal. Most people, if they learn that you steal, will lose more respect for you than you had to lose. I don't know anyone who has shoplifted except 'as a kid/teenager'. It is not always the case that virtue is rewarded and vice is punished but even before you bring the legal system into it, the risk-reward tradeoff of having everybody you know know that you steal things sometimes is absolutely terrible. Who would hire someone who steals things? Who would trust them around a vulnerable person? Who would want to live in a society with someone who will delightedly and routinely wreck it for the slightest personal benefit? I hope that "Gina" turns her life around. I hope that Gina realizes that she needs to. And if you have been told that it's just a corporation or that having ethics is lame or that if you think about it, other bad things happen too, like wage theft, so that means stealing is okay, I hope you really, actually, think about whether you'd accept any of those as excuses for anything else.
Josh Barro@jbarro

People hate the tone of this piece, but my view is you don't need a journalist to tell you wrong things are wrong. (She does also call her thieving friends nihilists.) It's weird to be surrounded by thieves though -- if people I know steal from Whole Foods, they don't admit it.

English
96
389
4.4K
646.7K
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
This is the new £20 note btw
Rachel Edwards tweet media
English
0
0
8
220
Rachel Edwards
Rachel Edwards@underthenettle·
I don't agree with this decision but I do sympathise with the Bank of England here. They're probably sick of everyone getting mad at them whenever they have to pick a new historical figure for the banknotes. Maybe this is the last time we'll ever have a big national argument about banknotes. Wouldn't that be nice?
BBC Breakfast@BBCBreakfast

British wildlife will replace historical figures on the next series of Bank of England banknotes - and the public will get their say on which animals and birds will appear. On #BBCBreakfast Peter Ruddick explained why it's the end people such as Winston Churchill, Jane Austen and Alan Turing on new £5, £10, £20 and £50 notes bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

English
2
1
12
1.8K
Saloni
Saloni@salonium·
This still sounds kind of crazy to me, but I'll be speaking at the TED Conference this year. They have written a very nice bio of me.
Saloni tweet mediaSaloni tweet media
English
26
21
376
15.6K
Rachel Edwards retweetledi
Cllr Alisha Lewis
Cllr Alisha Lewis@Alishacmlewis·
The issue with governments getting involved in creating sliding scale vice laws is that they must, in doing so, inherently publicly reveal what flavour of vice *is* acceptable to them. Nobody - on earth - wants to know what sort of porn Keir Starmer doesn’t mind them watching!
Geri Scott@Geri_E_L_Scott

Excl: Ministers are facing a rebellion over plans to curb degrading pornography after the government announced it would ban incest porn but allow material depicting “step-incest” relationships to remain legal. Senior Labour women told The Times they felt “betrayed” by the government and would not vote down an amendment which forced ministers to go further. The government confirmed the policy during debates on the Crime and Policing Bill in the House of Lords, where ministers introduced amendments to criminalise the possession or publication of pornographic images depicting sexual activity between close family members. Ministers said the move implemented one of the key recommendations from the independent review of pornography led by Baroness Bertin. However, the government confirmed that the offence would not apply to material depicting sexual relationships between step-relatives, and were then defeated with peers backing Bertin's amendment which went further. Multiple senior women in the party said the government would face a rebellion when the Bill returned to the Commons if they attempted to remove Bertin’s amendment. One told The Times: “I feel quite betrayed by it, how they pretended they were pushing ahead and accepting all of Gabby [Bertin’s] recommendations, only to whip us to back step-incest. I’ve never heard of anything like it.” A senior MP added: “If they think women who have been campaigning for years are going to toddle through the lobbies to say ‘yes actually step-incest porn is okay’ then they’re even less connected from reality than I thought.” An MoJ spokesman said: “We will reflect on the debates so far, and continue our work until we have fulfilled our promise to halve violence against women and girls.”

English
2
1
13
1.1K
Rachel Edwards retweetledi
Ellen Pasternack
Ellen Pasternack@pastasnack_e·
I’ve been wishing for years I could listen to Works in Progress instead of reading it, so am delighted that this is now going to be possible. A new audio recording will be released every week from the back catalogue, starting with one of my favourite articles WiP has ever published (by @PMArslanagic), and as a bonus you’ll hear it read in Stuart’s charming Edinburgh accent.
English
0
2
15
1.4K
Rachel Edwards retweetledi
Ellen Pasternack
Ellen Pasternack@pastasnack_e·
I strongly agree with this and would add: women complaining that a man asked them out (😱) are antisocial and should face social sanction for this behaviour. There is a difference between sexual harassment and having to turn down someone who approaches you romantically “offline”. The former is something that everyone in 2026 agrees is bad; the latter is a part of existing in society that adults should be able to handle graciously. I strongly suspect that complaints about being asked out are on some level a way to signal how desirable you are (“everyone wants me it’s soooo annoying”). It’s “punching down” at someone who stepped outside their comfort zone in a bid for connection; it pollutes the commons by making it harder for others to date and is generally rude and immature. Despite this one sees adult women indulging in this behaviour with surprising regularity!
Aria Schrecker@Aria_Babu

Dating and ‘professional contexts’ takes. 1. Most conferences do drinks and social things. In fact, the point of conferences isn’t to exchange information, it’s to get the people to know each other in a more vivid and personal way. 2. There’s a lot of space between ‘booking a 1-2-1’ to all someone out (cringe and bad) and flirting at the coffee station. 3. You’re a freak if your professional and personal lives are totally separate. I’m friends with my colleagues and I always have been everywhere I’ve worked. You’re also a bad networker. 4. This is especially true for Effective Altruism, politics, progress, art etc. Anywhere where your work is a calling and hobby as well as just a job. 5. The goal shouldn’t be 0 discomfort for anyone ever. Not to give Haidt any credit, but it’s not the worst thing in the world to reject an unwanted advance and we’re coddling young people. There are more precious and important things in the world than this form of safety. It’s cowardly for institutions to be so risk averse that they try to ban love. If people meet romantically at work/conferences they take on some of the downside risk of people being uncomfortable and get none of the upside of people being happier and more fulfilled. CEA doesn’t care if you struggle to connect with people on the apps. They do care if you do a mean comment about them on the forum.

English
4
11
292
35.1K