
This is stupid. Just add the damn numbers or memorize it. What are we even doing?
Vincent
186 posts

@vcarung
mathematical finance @uwaterloo

This is stupid. Just add the damn numbers or memorize it. What are we even doing?


#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-…
I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.
the point @RichardDawkins is making is: if Claude can code/do philosophy/engage in conversation and is not conscious and a human with late stage dementia who can't speak is "conscious" then the definition of "conscious" is broken and fundamentally useless which is obvious

#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-…
I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.
エルデシュ未解決問題集、今日だけで5問もopen→solvedにステータス更新されてて目ひん剥いた んでどれもわりとデカめな成果だと思う いずれもエーアイアシストを論文中に明記した上でガンガン活用した結果のようで、エーアイアシストの元での未解決問題開拓は軒下でどんどん進んでるんだねぇ

Dear @RichardDawkins, you've always been an inspiration to me. I made this website for you. My goal is for it to help you understand AI chatbots at a deeper level, and avoid getting fooled by sycophancy and other cheap tricks that models have learned through RLHF. dearricharddawkins.com

Richard Dawkins has officially been one-shot

Some meaningless phrases from calculus: -integrals are just areas under curves -derivatives are slopes -a continuous function is one that you can draw without lifting your pencil -limits are about getting arbitrarily close to a value

Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious. After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness. Follow: @AFpost

The difference between muscles built to earn a living, and muscles built to show off.



Trump: These are tough questions. They say take a number, any number. I say ok, 99. Multiply it by 9. Divide it by 3. Add 4293. Divide by 2. Subtract 93. Divide by 9. What is your answer? I got it right. It was actually more complex than that.

My robot can now feel how hard it's gripping something. I didn't add any sensors. Comment "tactile" and I'll DM how it works.