
Veronique de Rugy
32.1K posts

Veronique de Rugy
@veroderugy
Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University


Today a short viewpoint of mine was published on markets and machines. My first exploration of this topic traces back to studying with Don Lavoie in 1980s and his insistence that we read Dryfus and Polanyi. More recently, it was writing this piece with Rosolino Candela that motivated current engagement. DM me at GMU if you would like a copy.



A new @HooverInstitution study confirms what I’ve been saying for months. The CA Billionaire Tax has a negative NPV of -$24.7B. Meaning if this gets on the ballot and is approved in November, California doesn’t just collect less than promised, it actually LOSES money. This was dreamed up by SEIU-UHW to solve a healthcare funding problem that should have been solved by our politicians reducing waste, fraud and abuse in our state budget. Of course they chose to do nothing. Now it has blown up the state’s most reliable tax base. 71% of all 100,000 modeled scenarios = negative NPV and someone will have to pay for that -$24.7B hole. Who do you think California politicians will look to next? There are ~10M middle-class California households. If you do the math, that’s ~$2,500 per family. Not from billionaires. From YOU. What’s most maddening is Governor Gavin Newsom could have killed this before it went anywhere but he didn’t. He proves new all time highs for being incompetent and held captive. He now wants to do for America what he’s done for California. Buyer beware… hoover.org/research/net-p…





@davidsgamage encouraged me to closely read how @joshrauh came up with his revenue score and compare it to his. I had. But, took a closer look, and I wrote a brief comparison for everyone else.




Wherein Sen. Ted Cruz warmly recommends a paranoid rant peddling the usual “guilt by association” smears against Catholic postliberals like @Vermeullarmine, @SohrabAhmari, @PatrickDeneen, and @gjpappin, along with Catholic traditionalists and even @catholiccom


@davidsgamage encouraged me to closely read how @joshrauh came up with his revenue score and compare it to his. I had. But, took a closer look, and I wrote a brief comparison for everyone else.




Burdensome Regulations Don’t Make Safer Railroads (✍️@washingtonpost) The White House’s push for Vance’s Railway Safety Act flies in the face of his own talking points about innovation at last year’s AI summit in Paris. Link below.👇



Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions - also known as the fake news - have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up. The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not. And frankly, changing course is in their own business interests since trust in legacy media has now fallen to an all time low of just 9% and are ratings disasters. The American people have subsidized broadcasters to the tune of billions of dollars by providing free access to the nation’s airwaves. It is very important to bring trust back into media, which has earned itself the label of fake news. When a political candidate is able to win a landslide election victory after in the face of hoaxes and distortions, there is something very wrong. It means the public has lost faith and confidence in the media. And we can’t allow that to happen. Time for change!


It’s Good to Be a Billionaire, Even at Tax Time - The New York Times nytimes.com/2026/03/15/bus…