tom

.@freemanjiangg just pulled off the CRAZIEST live demo of all time!! He turned 2500 phones into a mesh speaker that he personally controls at the @socraticainfo Symposium Only in Waterloo, Canada.

why does 5.4 hate using the default puppeteer browser executable?

to address the allegations, yes i forget to mention that OurModel is actually urModel, but we added some Optimizations

@alexinexxx (they’re both arch btw)

i can't decide

The timeline contains multitudes

I prepopulated codex's context with ioccc code and now it's writing good, simple, not-over-engineered code

@LiamKearney99 checked just now, it gives a view button. can't say about algorithm reach tho

How do I block Elon from my FYP without ruining quote retweets of people clowning on him? If I block someone do I still see quote tweets of them?

basis for my understanding is > When you select GPT‑5.4 Thinking in ChatGPT, you’ll see a thinking‑time toggle in the message composer. > > Standard (new default, balancing speed and intelligence) and Extended (the previous default for Plus) are available to all Plus and Business users. > > Pro users get two additional options: Light (snappiest) and Heavy (deeper reasoning). help.openai.com/en/articles/11… My guess is that light,standard,extended,heavy = minimal,low,medium,high (this set of levels existed before xhigh was added w/ 5.2)

@snwy_me I've felt this. In chatgpt, "standard thinking" appears to map to low reasoning effort, and at low effort, the model often (not just in chatgpt) opts not to reason. I had the model on high effort, which I think is inaccessible in chatgpt unless you pay Pro sub

task that LLMs are awful at: choosing a name that is one word and the last N characters should be a TLD (generic example, not indicative of anything i'm doing)

@snwy_me 5.4 did well for me #8d58e06397e2d8a3b3a01098ba1f2e1b" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">pi.dev/session/#8d58e…

@snwy_me oh huh. gotta make a benchmark for this so the labs will game it until it works

@ohryansbelt give em a break for scamming cluely

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

90% of my new repos are using gstack

it's 2026 and llms still dont listen when told not to use bullet lists

ICYMI this from my AMA yesterday. We’ve decided to retain existing Horizon Worlds in VR for the foreseeable future. I know this is a bit of whiplash just a few days after we announced something different, but Horizon has some real fans in the VR community and they encouraged us to reconsider our decision.

@fishPointer find sf forklift make no mistakes

sf forklift sf forklift fast sf forklift same day reddit

@thdxr have not yet personally verified, but x.com/fynnso/status/…

i wish there was more information about this like what model they started with feels weird that all of a sudden the tools we're relying on are super opaque hasn't been like this for decades

@nikitabier Why is the summary >280 chars

We’re rolling out summaries for Articles now. Just tap the Summarize button if you want to know if it’s worth your time to read it (or if your attention span is 12 seconds).

accidently typed in gail.com instead of gmail, and its my new favorite website.