n?a1234

1.4K posts

n?a1234 banner
n?a1234

n?a1234

@vurp2001

Katılım Eylül 2022
3 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
David Keyes
David Keyes@DavidMKeyes·
have you guys ever read the Quran? you REALLY should.
English
349
23
200
17.7K
Talal Al-Otaibi
Talal Al-Otaibi@c7deo·
I just realized you’re a 'Pastafarian' atheist. It’s quite ironic—you claim to follow science and logic, yet your entire presence here is based on intellectual dishonesty. If you don't believe in God, why are you obsessing over 1,400-year-old scriptures? You’re not here for a debate; you’re just a troll hiding behind a 'Spaghetti Monster' because you lack the courage to face your own existential void. You use mistranslated words to attack Islam, but you fail to realize that without a moral objective—which atheism cannot provide—your definitions of 'good' and 'bad' are just chemical reactions in your brain. Why should anyone care about the 'morals' of a man who thinks he’s an accidental byproduct of a noodle? Stick to your pasta, because when it comes to history, linguistics, and philosophy, you’re clearly out of your league. Satire doesn't make you smart; it just makes your ignorance louder. 🤏🏻
English
3
0
0
18
Joshua Hall
Joshua Hall@JoshHall2024·
🚨BREAKING:🚨POPE LEO THE LEFTIST - Campaign finance records reveal that WOKE POPE Leo was a MAJOR DONOR to Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential campaign, has financially supported Planned Parenthood, LGBT activist organizations, down ballot Democrat candidates for office and OTHER WOKE CAUSES. Before he became Pope, Leo also reportedly was a frequent attendee of anti-Trump marches and protests and routinely attacked President Trump in highly personal terms during his church services as a priest. He is also a registered Democrat who was a vocal supporter of DISGRACED former President Barack Obama in their shared hometown of Chicago. Many conservatives thought Pope Francis was bad... But his liberal activism paled in comparison to this POLITICALLY MOTIVATED, WOKE POPE!
Joshua Hall tweet media
English
992
3.9K
6.2K
118K
Arioch
Arioch@YepItsF_cked·
@theerealtao @SilverIock atheism ultimately leads to communism because you start worshipping men instead of Gods. Worshipping other men as if they were Gods is very delusional.
English
1
0
0
9
Tao☠️
Tao☠️@theerealtao·
I think most theist only believe in the afterlife because they can't comprehend the context of non-existence.
English
52
23
232
5.5K
n?a1234
n?a1234@vurp2001·
@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Here I'll make it easy. You have no foundational grounding for knowledge and truth. I have an objective transcendental standard which provides me with the necessary conditions for logic, knowledge, reason and reality.
English
0
0
1
3
RabidWookie
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie·
@vurp2001 @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus In response to me explaining the word had nothing to do with anything I ever said, after quoting me as if what I had said qualified as hard solipsism. You then posted a definition with only part of it (matching what I said) highlighted, ignoring the core of the definition.
English
4
0
0
13
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
If you believe that only evidence justifies a belief... That itself "only evidence justifies a belief" is also a belief. But what's the evidence for that? Ultimately beliefs have to based in something besides evidence.
English
56
5
91
3.3K
n?a1234
n?a1234@vurp2001·
@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @GreekVikingX @darwintojesus Dunno if you know what the words 'ad hominem' mean mate. Did you swallow a presup dictionary to just repeat to avoid defending your claims? If you say the word 'tag' I'll paypal you 5 bucks! FYI- that was an ad hominem attack.
English
1
0
1
4
RabidWookie
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie·
@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @darwintojesus 1. Basic logic dictates an unmoved mover for your own assumptions to make sense. Read Aristotle. 2. The Unmoved Mover by definition could not be what is moved, that violates the 3 laws of logic. 3. Correct, this argument does not point to a specific God, that’s a separate one.
English
2
0
0
9
么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,
么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,@kaizen000000000·
Tell me again that believers/religious people are not arrogant... Alex o'connor 💯❤️
English
343
329
9.4K
304.4K
RabidWookie
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie·
@vurp2001 @GreekVikingX @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus This is sad. You refuse to engage with any of the obvious entailments of atheism because they’re indefensible under scrutiny. Explain how an uncreated universe could be anything but random. You don’t believe free will exists?
English
2
0
0
15
RabidWookie
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie·
@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @darwintojesus You keep saying “hard solipsism” but seem to have no idea what the term actually means. Is this some sort of reddit atheist talking point you’re spamming out? Me citing basic epistemology has nothing whatsoever to do with “hard solipsism”, which I reject.
English
1
0
0
16
RabidWookie
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie·
@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @darwintojesus So you admit that you have to assume things you can’t prove in any way whatsoever to function. Which debunks your entire assertion that science is built on “proof”. Now, are you courageous enough to explore the obvious entailments of those assumptions you deem required?
English
2
0
0
8
RabidWookie
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie·
@vurp2001 @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Redefining a word from it’s common usage. It’s a diversion technique because you can’t address the underlying argument, which is the same whether you want to call yourself atheist or agnostic.
English
2
0
0
10
RabidWookie
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie·
@vurp2001 @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus It’s the only possible solution. You should read Aristotle, he addressed all of these concepts a long time ago. They’re the foundation of logic, which all science and reason derives from. He should be required reading in all schools.
English
2
0
0
10