n?a1234
1.4K posts


@vurp2001 @c7deo @akathunder14 @DavidMKeyes Me?
No, absolutely not. Gender is binary, science is very clear on this.
Many who believe different have mental disorders
English

I just realized you’re a 'Pastafarian' atheist. It’s quite ironic—you claim to follow science and logic, yet your entire presence here is based on intellectual dishonesty. If you don't believe in God, why are you obsessing over 1,400-year-old scriptures?
You’re not here for a debate; you’re just a troll hiding behind a 'Spaghetti Monster' because you lack the courage to face your own existential void. You use mistranslated words to attack Islam, but you fail to realize that without a moral objective—which atheism cannot provide—your definitions of 'good' and 'bad' are just chemical reactions in your brain. Why should anyone care about the 'morals' of a man who thinks he’s an accidental byproduct of a noodle?
Stick to your pasta, because when it comes to history, linguistics, and philosophy, you’re clearly out of your league. Satire doesn't make you smart; it just makes your ignorance louder. 🤏🏻
English

@Husaria25 @obtom62 @Chadrapp @TinaTweeker @JoshHall2024 It's stupid to ask why a god see's devout and sincere people begging for help, but does nothing?
English

🚨BREAKING:🚨POPE LEO THE LEFTIST - Campaign finance records reveal that WOKE POPE Leo was a MAJOR DONOR to Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential campaign, has financially supported Planned Parenthood, LGBT activist organizations, down ballot Democrat candidates for office and OTHER WOKE CAUSES. Before he became Pope, Leo also reportedly was a frequent attendee of anti-Trump marches and protests and routinely attacked President Trump in highly personal terms during his church services as a priest. He is also a registered Democrat who was a vocal supporter of DISGRACED former President Barack Obama in their shared hometown of Chicago. Many conservatives thought Pope Francis was bad... But his liberal activism paled in comparison to this POLITICALLY MOTIVATED, WOKE POPE!

English

@YepItsF_cked @theerealtao @SilverIock How so?
And even if people did start worshipping men, how does that lead to communism?
English

@theerealtao @SilverIock atheism ultimately leads to communism because you start worshipping men instead of Gods. Worshipping other men as if they were Gods is very delusional.
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Here I'll make it easy. You have no foundational grounding for knowledge and truth. I have an objective transcendental standard which provides me with the necessary conditions for logic, knowledge, reason and reality.
English

@vurp2001 @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus In response to me explaining the word had nothing to do with anything I ever said, after quoting me as if what I had said qualified as hard solipsism. You then posted a definition with only part of it (matching what I said) highlighted, ignoring the core of the definition.
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus I just posted the full definition. Which includes the thing you said it does not. Cool story bro. Handwaving hey. hahahahaahaha
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @GreekVikingX @darwintojesus Dunno if you know what the words 'ad hominem' mean mate. Did you swallow a presup dictionary to just repeat to avoid defending your claims? If you say the word 'tag' I'll paypal you 5 bucks!
FYI- that was an ad hominem attack.
English

@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @GreekVikingX @darwintojesus I accept your ad hominems as concessions.
x.com/rabidw00kie/st…
RabidWookie@RabidW00kie
@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @GreekVikingX @darwintojesus No, you’re simply refusing to admit that not believing in a creator dictates your accounting of ethics, epistemology, & metaphysics. You can’t admit that because you know it’s a house of cards supporting your position.
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus How can something that is unmoved and cannot be moved do anything? How can it 'create'- an action which involves space and time?
English

@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @darwintojesus 1. Basic logic dictates an unmoved mover for your own assumptions to make sense. Read Aristotle.
2. The Unmoved Mover by definition could not be what is moved, that violates the 3 laws of logic.
3. Correct, this argument does not point to a specific God, that’s a separate one.
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Why? I haven't said that's something you claimed. I posted a definition of a word.
English

@vurp2001 @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Please cite where I said one’s own mind is the only thing certain to exist.
English

@BritishArno @OktayKl59931624 @marshallpittman @kaizen000000000 You just repeated your claim. God exists and is the objective standard etc. I know you think that. I'm asking how and why you know this?
English

@vurp2001 @OktayKl59931624 @marshallpittman @kaizen000000000 Evil/Bad does not positively exist, Good does positively exist.
Therefore the good is objective, our access to the good comes through the Eastern Orthodox Church.
English

@RabidW00kie @GreekVikingX @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus OK. can you tell me what the 'obvious entailments of atheism' are and I'll try to address you questions
English

@vurp2001 @GreekVikingX @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus This is sad. You refuse to engage with any of the obvious entailments of atheism because they’re indefensible under scrutiny. Explain how an uncreated universe could be anything but random. You don’t believe free will exists?
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus ''that it is impossible to prove the existence of an external world'. What do you define the word as?
English

@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @darwintojesus You keep saying “hard solipsism” but seem to have no idea what the term actually means. Is this some sort of reddit atheist talking point you’re spamming out? Me citing basic epistemology has nothing whatsoever to do with “hard solipsism”, which I reject.
English

@RabidW00kie @GreekVikingX @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Where did I claim the universe is random?
Or that freewill exists?
English

@vurp2001 @GreekVikingX @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Dodging the question again. How could free will exist in a random uncreated strictly material universe? It’s a transcendental concept.
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus How does it debunk science being based on proof?
We all accept these axioms.
English

@AlwaysWrightDM @vurp2001 @darwintojesus So you admit that you have to assume things you can’t prove in any way whatsoever to function. Which debunks your entire assertion that science is built on “proof”. Now, are you courageous enough to explore the obvious entailments of those assumptions you deem required?
English

@vurp2001 @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus Redefining a word from it’s common usage. It’s a diversion technique because you can’t address the underlying argument, which is the same whether you want to call yourself atheist or agnostic.
English

@RabidW00kie @vurp2001 @darwintojesus Waving your hand in the direction of Aristotle doesn't solve your problems
English

@RabidW00kie @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus I have done thanks. And Thomas Aquinas' reframing of it.
How is it the only possible solution?
English

@vurp2001 @AlwaysWrightDM @darwintojesus It’s the only possible solution. You should read Aristotle, he addressed all of these concepts a long time ago. They’re the foundation of logic, which all science and reason derives from. He should be required reading in all schools.
English





