watson16

@wei2high @DailyMail Maybe you’d feel differently if you were the one trying to disarm him, or if it was one of your loved ones he’d just stabbed. It’s easy to criticise from your basement - if you can do it better, then sign up and show them all how.

@DailyMail No justification to kick a man that's clearly mentally ill in the head like a football.

Green Party leader Zack Polanski condemned for retweet criticising hero police who took down Golders Green terrorist trib.al/sdrwomr

@nstecker_ @calvinrobinson Why can’t she do both? Women are generally pretty good at multitasking. and, as it’s not 1950 anymore, we can set an example to our children with a good work ethic as well as being a good parent.

@calvinrobinson Erika’s highest calling is to care for her children not run TPUSA

I genuinely thought this was AI when I first saw it. Please, someone close to Erika, speak to her in love. She cried leaving the Correspondents Dinner, “I just wanna go home” Encourage her to go home. She does not need to do this. Go home, be a mother.

@BadazsBoomer @imelizabethlane @MrsErikaKirk And you don’t think his widow wants that justice more than anyone else? Does it occur to you she’s been advised to stay away until the trial? That she is kept more informed than any of us are? That maybe, by continuing the work with TPUSA it’s helping her feel close to Charlie?

You are amazing. Very well written Elizabeth. You are a true journalist and very talented. Thank you for writing a message we all want this woman, too understand about how we feel. Especially having the guts to put it on X where people live on headlines and quick sensationalism for a rush. More than six words and they get bored and need to go to the next post. Let’s hope some will stop for once and read something with depth and substance. The public wants the truth and justice for Charlie. Thank you for going to the court hearings. How can she be so blind to not understand this is where she needs to be if she wants any kind of credibility and she keeps letting us down letting Charlie down. No matter We all just want Justice for Charlie.

Dear @MrsErikaKirk Honestly, I didn’t feel the need to make a big post or comment about your attendance at the correspondents’ dinner. Where you go or what you do isn’t really something I focus on unless it has a direct impact on things I care about. That said, there’s a pattern that’s hard to ignore, whenever you’re called out for something people perceive as inappropriate, your response tends to be to insult your critics or position yourself as above them, while dismissing others as malicious. At some point, it may be worth recognizing a simpler reality. Many people just don’t like you. And that’s their right. People are free to form their own opinions, even when those opinions aren’t favorable. Maybe you genuinely don’t see what you’re doing wrong and maybe the criticism you receive feels completely unfair. But have you ever taken a moment to ask yourself, - What part am I playing in this? If you truly aren’t doing anything wrong, then why do the reactions you get seem so consistently at odds with what you expect? Guess what, there could be a hundred Candaces in the world criticizing you and it still wouldn’t move people unless what they’re saying actually resonates. People don’t just fall for narratives that easily especially today. You cannot force someone to see something they fundamentally don’t see or don’t believe. That kind of influence is incredibly difficult to manufacture just ask the CIA they will tell you all about it. Quick history lesson, even organizations like the CIA with billions in funding, massive infrastructure, coordinated networks and thousands of operatives have had to invest enormous effort over long periods to shape public perception in any meaningful way. And even then, results are never guaranteed. So the idea that one commentator (Or two or three) no matter how skilled, can single-handedly turn people against you just doesn’t hold up. The reaction you’re getting isn’t because of Candace, it’s because of you. Your own actions are what people respond to. That’s the uncomfortable reality, wake up to it already, I say this with no hate. At some point, you have to stop deflecting and ask yourself an honest question: why does this keep happening to me? Why do people consistently react this way? We’re not living in North Korea, people are allowed to form and express opinions freely and as long as America is America they will do just that, it is their right, just like it is yours to be unhappy about it. Dismissing all criticism as manipulation avoids the real issue here. And let’s be clear: you’re not some untouchable public figure in the mold of Jacqueline Kennedy. That comparison doesn’t land the way you think it does. Whoever told you, you could be her is not your friend, get rid of him/her. Curve your own path. Again I don’t say this to be disrespectful. This isn’t coming from a place of hate, not at all, it’s frustration. A lot of people are tired of the constant back-and-forth, the blame-shifting and the refusal to reflect. You are clearly bothered by all of this, but I don’t see you saying, ''Oh, you know what? These people don’t like me no matter what I do. It’s so unfair, but maybe I should step out of the limelight for a while and see if things change. So it doesn’t hurt the company.'' No, instead, you come out and you have no problem attending parties, dinners and opening events with Nicki Minaj, holding hands, even though your husband clearly didn’t like her. I’m guessing he didn’t like her because most of her songs start with a dick and end with a pussy, or one inside the other (should I tag the songs?). I’m sorry for the expression, but it’s not mine, it is the woman’s you chose to have on stage next to you. Then, at that same event, you’re going to mention the Lord like 50 times and have a literal former stripper speaking in front of students about how they should live. Then you go ahead and criticize the students and everyone else who judge you for this. Do you see the problem? As Leo Tolstoy wrote, ''All happy families are alike, each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.'' And while you can understand it as - everyone grieves differently, the point he made was actually much simpler, dysfunction is usually self-generated and unique in its causes. And if Tolstoy were around today, he might put it even more bluntly: no one creates their own problems quite like you do… I assume you’ve seen my post, most people have, so you’re aware that my opinion of you is far from favorable. That said, in my capacity as a journalist, I haven’t made a habit of targeting you or spending weeks analyzing your every move, event, or speech. I only comment on matters where you have influence over issues I care deeply about. Quite frankly, I’m not extremely interested in you, especially when our country is facing serious challenges. But what’s actually concerning to me is watching you come out and double down on claims that are demonstrably false. Saying things like, ''Candace Owens is accusing me of murdering my husband,'' or that people who criticize you are evil or something similar, this is simply not accurate. She has not accused you of murder. Not publicly anyway. So why say it? Because you're reframing the criticism into something more extreme than it is. You’re acting as if anyone who questions you must believe you were involved in your husband’s death and that they must be all evil, while you must be a constant victim of this supposed malice. That’s not what’s being said here at all. Let’s be clear: The issue people have with you is different, it’s behavioral, not criminal. I’ve described you as a person exhibiting traits of psychopathy and I stand by that as my opinion. Again I’m allowed to have one, just like you are allowed to disrespect it. I’m not saying this to be cruel, I mean it seriously. Psychopathy reflect something deeply complex and very difficult to deal with in life, not something trivial so trust me when I say, I do not say this with hate at all. It ’s a simple observation. You may disagree, that is your right. And it is my right to expressing my opinion on a public figure that has made herself a target by refusing to leave the spotlight and cameras even when she gets a negative feedback constantly. Constantly! And to be precise, if you go back to what @RealCandaceO actually said, her claim was that she intends to prove that something is off about you. She did not say she intends to prove you killed your husband. Those are two completely different arguments and conflating them only distorts what’s actually being discussed. It also should be noted that Charlie Kirk’s investigation is ongoing for Candace and for most of us, and the “Charlie’s Bride” series Candace produced is separate from that ongoing investigation. That is why it is placed separately as an 8-episode series on her YouTube. It is a standalone thing. I kindly invite you to check it out. So to put it plainly, someone could lose a spouse in a completely unrelated event, like a car accident and still face criticism if their behavior afterward appears detached, performative, or inconsistent with what most people understand as grief. Being criticized for how you act is not the same as being accused of murder. And if Charlie had died in a car accident and you behaved the way you are behaving now, the reaction would be the same (I can speak for myself her). So no, this is not about Charlie or Candace, it’s about you. People are questioning your behavior and what it suggests about your character. That’s the real issue, not murder. You can keep saying that everyone grieves differently, but apparently this nation and others as well has never seen anyone grieve the way you do that is why they keep talking about it. So maybe you should take a step back and reflect. When millions of people (And they are in millions, this is why it got to the point where it bothers you and your organization) are telling you something feels off, you don’t lash out. You take time to ask yourself why people perceive you that way, especially if you believe that perception is absolutely incorrect. That’s the mature response. Rolling your eyes at people and calling them names isn’t the answer, especially if you want a public career or hope to lead others. And if you don’t want that scrutiny, then walk away. The spotlight is not for everybody. Or take an example from your husband, who was a warrior, he handled it perfectly. He faced being hated all the time and he still engaged them and accepted them he didn’t tell them to shut up. If he thought people who criticized him were evil, he wouldn’t be sitting in front of them trying to understand their point and help them. You have the money, you’re taken care of thanks to Charlie. If the spotlight is a burden, step aside and let someone else take on the role, someone the public will accept. If you do that, you’ll likely be forgotten in six months and you won’t have to deal with criticism anymore. You will be able to finally live privately, attend events all day long and no one will care. But when you say that 'evil people won’t stop you from having it all or what your husband built for you or whatever idea is driving your actions and you say you’ll continue regardless of what people think, great, good for you - but then you should expect people to do exactly that: THINK. And their opinions may not align with what you want. That’s life. Get over it. You claimed you attended the dinner not to mingle with influential people or enjoy the spotlight, but to meet some journalists who have written negatively about you, to put faces to names. Well, let’s put a face to the name. I’m ready to sit down with you any day, at your convenience, even in your own studio if you prefer. You’re not the only one who values being direct. So here I am, willing to have a genuine conversation. The offer stands. No hate, no disrespect. Just a difference of opinion. Let’s see if what you say is true. And if you can’t handle an interview with someone who disagrees with you and doesn’t like you,then that’s fine. I totally understand that. Not everyone can do what Charlie did - engaging directly with critics instead of avoiding them. In that case, you can always put a face to a name in Utah court. Come see me in court, where your husband’s supposed killer is on trial, I'm always there. I suggest you bring a pre-prepared lunch, it can be an absolutely grueling ordeal. Sometimes it goes on for 6+ hours with only 15-minute breaks, with no time to go out and eat. But we sit through it because it’s important. It’s Charlie Kirk! We are interested in who killed Charlie Kirk and whether we have the right guy and if we do, we want to see that the process goes exactly how it should. So yes, you can find me there. I haven’t seen you even once, not once attending the hearing. Maybe one day you can show up. I bet it will help with the criticism part of things :)). You said you like directness, so do I. So here you go. I’ll leave my invitation open for you to sit down with me.

@nosoup4knowles @imelizabethlane @MrsErikaKirk Translation - we’re going to bully you into going away because we want to.

@imelizabethlane @MrsErikaKirk Translation: if you don't like being dehumanized, we can make all of this go away. You just have to step down.

@FizzyCuteness @ashleybrianaeve Jeez-wonder if something happened in the last few months that might have made her angry Not enough to see her husband gunned down,have constant attacks from Candace & her idiot followers, mocked when she’s compassionate, criticised for how she dresses, now you object to her tone

@ashleybrianaeve I was thinking the same thing! What's with the outfit ,and her tone - he tone does not echo confidence or compassion, more like threats !

Why is she dressed like an assassin? Is Andrew Kolvet still giving PR advice? This is NOT the right move….whether you think she is involved or not this was not a good move. WTF is going on in rich people PR lately?!

@realstewpeters I hope she sues you.

ERIKA KIRK: “Every morning I have to wake up & hear Candace Owens claim that I murdered my husband.” 1. Candace has never claimed that Erika personally killed Charlie. 2. Erika was definitely Charlie’s handler & knew about the assassination beforehand.

@TheFabBookLover @realstewpeters Why not? Do you have a text book on grief? Who are you to decide what is or is not, acceptable grieving in anyone else?

@realstewpeters No widow acts the way she did.

@nosoup4knowles And not ‘did you….’ - it’s ’why did you…’ so not even a presumption of innocence.

WOWwwww.... Andrew Kolvet just dropped texts of Candace telling Aubrey jokingly that she was gonna ask Erika "why did you murder your husband?"

@stelzner_n1150 Oh look, another man telling a woman how she should behave. It’s not 1950 anymore - women can do both.

Erika Kirk needs to resign from TPUSA and go back to being a mother ASAP.

@MissKatyAllison @buckleycarlson @goddek @RealCandaceO @TPUSA What makes you think she hasn’t been? Candace has plenty to lose but even more to gain with her grifting for clicks. No one (except idiots) believes that she’s doing this because she was once Charlie’s friend.

@watson17242 @buckleycarlson @goddek @RealCandaceO @TPUSA Discovery’s a bitch. Candace has nothing to loose and everything to gain. I believe ANYONE inCharlie Kirk direct orbit SHOULD be questioned, because after all everyone’s “innocent ‘til proven guilty”. If there’s any shadow of a doubt, check them off the list and release.

No, she hasn’t. And this is outrageous straw man BS. AMERICANS Just want the truth! Why is that so hard to attain…or too much to ask?

@JodyChaseTN @merissahansen17 Once again - why do you care? What can she wear that you would approve of? Should she have your sign off before she chooses what to wear?

@watson17242 @merissahansen17 Makes sense to me to wear assassin attire while talking about assassins 😂

Candace Owens has never once said that Erika Kirk murdered her husband.

@ellen17jules @realstewpeters Oh look - Julie the kind, loving Christian is once again showing her compassion & empathy to a widow, and once again, dictating how she should live her life - the way Julie wants her to.

Maybe if you weren’t in the the spotlight 24/7 you wouldn’t get this kind of attention!! Ever think of that?! You are not Charlie! You have NO charisma, you are NOT intelligent, you cannot debate and you cannot tell the truth!! We cannot stand you, sorry!! Try being a mother to your fatherless children for once!!!

@MissKatyAllison @buckleycarlson @goddek @RealCandaceO @TPUSA She said Erika should be dragged in by the police - why do you think she said that? She doesn’t want to lose a defamation case now does she - so she’s just careful enough to chuck out smears enough for weak minded idiots to fill in the gaps and whip up a hateful narrative.

@buckleycarlson @goddek .@RealCandaceO has LITERALLY never said that and I challenge anyone at @TPUSA to share the exact clip where she explicitly says that, per vatim? I’ll wait.

@Houhot @stuzi_pants @Eyeswideopen69 Is that what you advise the girls in Rotherham to say?

@stuzi_pants @Eyeswideopen69 Don’t mess with us North East gals. We don’t need any lectures/protection from rich slimy oiks. Good lass Bridget.

- What are you up to today Rupert Lowe? - Well I thought I’d just Moseley on down to PMQs and throw out some peak Islamophobia Lowe walks right into his own shitwizardry while trying to titillate his base with the usual ‘brown meat’ dog whistles

@JodyChaseTN @merissahansen17 Can this woman wear anything you approve of? Should she run her wardrobe choices past you in advance? Why do you care how she dresses?

@merissahansen17 Can someone explain why she's dressed like a literal assassin.... She is well aware on what she's doing

@merissahansen17 She’s certainly implied it. She can’t say it explicitly because then she’ll be sued. So she’s careful, she smears just enough to avoid litigation, but also just enough to whip up a rabid hateful narrative - with zero evidence, and equally zero compassion.

Do I believe the behavior surrounding Charlie’s murder has been handled in the most and insidious manner possible? Yes. However, Candace Owens has never explicitly stated that Erika murdered her husband. Frankly, I find this entire situation quite suspicious for both sides.

@narindertweets @Rod__Mason @MehreenKhn I’d rather let Rupert Lowe look after my child for an afternoon than Zack Polanski. At least I know my child would be safe, protected and return having learnt about farming, as opposed to returning confused about his gender, hating his own skin colour and waving a Palestine flag.

@Rod__Mason @MehreenKhn He's publicly backed Lowe - leader of Restore I wouldn't want my child ANYWHERE near someone like that.

John Terry, former England Captain has backed Rupert Lowes policy to ban "foreigners" (presumably ILR) from claiming benefits with a comment "100% yes" John Terry, I understand, currently works part-time as an academy coach at Chelsea, helping develop youth players...I wouldn't want him near my child.

@BiblicalBeauty You need to let it go & move on - it’s been over 20years.

I never see these two without thinking, this should have been Diana.

@KarlWuckert Super weird as a Christian that you’re so devoid of empathy and happy to punch down at a widow.

It’s super weird that Erika Kirk thinks her opinion matters just because her husband’s did.

@jackunheard Following just for that.

To the demons: I will never stop praying for Erika Kirk. I will never stop praying for anyone. Everyone needs prayers. There is nothing more important than prayer.

I replied to Erika Kirk and said I’m praying for her. I lost a ton of followers for it. Is this really what we’re doing now?