Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Kim
119.3K posts

Kim
@Web4Door
Human Capitalist, Spoonie, & Worldly Christian, Over Blocker
Edmond, OK Katılım Ekim 2023
3.1K Takip Edilen4K Takipçiler

@ChiefEngineerCE That's more than half correct
But there's other reasons
That's just common
English

There is a clear financial reason many employers aggressively pursue visa workers, especially in engineering and tech roles.
Unlike US graduates who carry heavy debt with no built-in relief, foreign visa workers often come with structural advantages that directly reduce employer costs or increase control.
Here is how the incentives actually work in practice:
Visa sponsorship ties the worker to the employer.H-1B status is usually linked to the sponsoring company. This reduces turnover risk during the visa period and gives the employer leverage that US employees do not have.
Prevailing wage loopholes and cost arbitrage. Many companies (especially outsourcing-heavy firms) hire H-1B workers at or near the lower end of the prevailing wage range while avoiding full benefits packages or long-term retention costs that US workers expect. The net payroll savings can be substantial when scaled across dozens or hundreds of roles.
Quite simply - An H1B doesn't expect a raise, won't leave because of issues with benefits, and can be low-balled come bonus time without complaint. They will sit in compliance and work to keep their jobs.
Offshoring extension. Once the work or billing is routed through foreign subsidiaries, even if the parent company is American, costs and accountability move partially outside the full spotlight of U.S. regulators. Audits slow down and tracing becomes more difficult.
Offshoring extension. Once the work or billing is routed through foreign subsidiaries, even if the parent company is American, costs and accountability move partially outside the full spotlight of U.S. regulators. Audits slow down and tracing becomes more difficult.
The advantage in tech for hiring Visa employees is about control, flexibility, and wage pressure more than outright government cash subsidies.
This creates a quiet distortion in the labor market- well known by the employers less obvious to us. Systems that publicly cite “talent shortages” in engineering and tech frequently route the easiest cost and control advantages toward imported pipelines rather than expanding domestic training slots, debt relief, or apprenticeship programs for US graduates. Even though they are REQUIRED to with part of the H1B visa fees.
US engineering graduates face average debt burdens similar to medical graduates, yet they compete in a market where employers have clear structural incentives to favor visa workers for certain roles.
From an engineering perspective this is basic systems analysis: when the incentive structure rewards importing compliant, lower-commitment labor over building long-term domestic competence, the organization optimizes for short-term cost metrics instead of long-term capability.
Engineers often notice the subtle clues first because we are the ones asked to implement or sign off on work that does not add up technically or operationally.
So for the engineers, PMs, and hiring managers reading this- Question:
Have you seen cost, control, or incentive advantages that clearly tilt toward visa workers in your projects or teams?
APA References :
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2025). Conrad 30 waiver program. uscis.gov/working-in-the…
National Health Service Corps. (2026). Fiscal Year 2026 NHSC Loan Repayment Program application & program guidance. Health Resources and Services Administration.
English

NEW: GOP campaigns are betting big on AI in the midterms
Dems -- not so much
More w/@hollyotterbein
axios.com/2026/04/14/rep…
English

He’s doing such incredible transformation there. It’s really inspiring
Nayib Bukele@nayibbukele
We’re building the best healthcare system in the world.
English

And US Citizens shouldn’t have to guess if the federal government is lying to us that any safety studies were even ran🤷🏼♀️ See how that works? Those pesky little Covid gene therapies you still push while calling them vaccines fall into these definitions.
FDA has now acknowledged that products operating through genetic material require flexible, evolving regulatory standards. This completely contradicts how these products were represented during roll out!! They lied and call them vaccines!!
They didn’t just sell this to the government.
They mandated it on people‼️
Jobs.
Custody.
Military.
Healthcare.
Everyday life.
All based on one narrative:
“Safe. Tested. Standard vaccine.”
Now the FDA is openly saying these products are:
→ complex biologics
→ regulated with flexibility
→ evolving during development
So let’s be honest about what happened:
People were forced to take something…that was not what it was presented to be…and now that we’re injured we’re refused help! Because they surely don’t cover the injuries like they do vaccines!! There’s not even an injury table TO compensate from.
That’s fraud. That’s NOT informed consent. That matters.
Dr. Marty Makary@DrMakaryFDA
Cell and gene therapy developers shouldn’t have to guess about what safety studies FDA wants to see. Today, FDA issued clear draft guidance that will save developers millions of dollars and years of effort, accelerating treatments to patients. Every effort to move more efficiently here is worth it.
English

@SebastianCaliri Rather than continuing to perpetuate or improve existing research publishing models, are there alternatives to just crack on with and drop outdated publication approaches?
English

Peer reviewed studies cannot keep pace with developments in AI and are not proving to be a source of useful information to consumers. This paper uses models from 2022 and 2024! Next to useless.
Researchers should use up to date models, post their prompts and methodology publicly, and let others reproduce their results.
Traditional peer review has many benefits but is not suitable for the moment we are in. There are other ways to show the quality of a study and expose findings to rigorous critique.

Polymarket@Polymarket
JUST IN: Study reveals AI gives misleading medical advice about 50% of the time, with at least 20% being "highly problematic"
English

I gave a talk to my department yesterday where I told them to ignore peer reviewed studies. It’s not just about the models now, it’s also about the harness. The improvements are weekly. The other thing we’re missing is user variability; the people who use AI more frequently can get better answers (they write better prompts, they are better at discerning the response, they choose better models, they choose better harnesses).
English

A fire broke out early April 14 at BYD's Pingshan facility in Shenzhen—but only in a multi-story parking garage storing test and scrapped vehicles (not production lines or battery assembly).
BYD, local fire authorities, Reuters, SCMP, and Straits Times confirm: blaze started ~2:48 AM, extinguished quickly, zero casualties or injuries, no production impact.
No evidence supports claims of trapped workers, deaths, or Xi/Wang cover-up. Video shows the garage fire; rumors amplified the drama.
English

@Web4Door Does that mean they're back in the race for Artemis 3?
Wildwood Lake, TN 🇺🇸 English

@liumin1988 这么多年墙内外我都是畅通无阻,今年来墙外的弱智新闻真的一个比一个离谱,台独因为高度封锁近亲繁殖导致了脑瘫比例急剧上升
中文

@liumin1988 The narrative! The narrative!!!!!
Nothing is more important than the narrative!
English

@spoonwerks @TRUMP_ARMY_ You have the key to my house
The potential is
We cool?
If not maybe I shoulda done done that
English

@TRUMP_ARMY_ That’s a major move to secure America’s cloud systems and block potential espionage. A big step for national security.
English

@ddivey95 @HarvestNFTs Go to the creator
Ask them if they will be doing a plan
English

@HarvestNFTs I would love to sell mine where and how do I do this?
English














