@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻

30.2K posts

@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻 banner
@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻

@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻

@WHUT

whut's happening? → Earth Sciences 🌏 Mathematical GeoEnergy (Wiley/AGU, 2019) 🌊 https://t.co/IGGOHc2YC1 https://t.co/v9iiFNoYzq

heart of @ilhan -- MN 5th ! Katılım Mart 2008
1.5K Takip Edilen713 Takipçiler
@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻
@BStarr96522 @TWTThisIsNow @FredHikes @patfrank830 @QI_181 @hairymarx1 @Konrad_Chapman @Frnc_prep @BrknMan @GlonvecHQ @PoyetPatrice @ICcrapdaily @ejwwest @priscian @CymaticWave @LxxResearcher @HeidlerNeal @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @AtomsksSanakan @ericonthetrail @dangerousbeenz @bobathon @Dooderoo @JoernWiedemann @OceanadeSilva @USAMRIID_CA @agentsinaction @FriedrichFiles @BatcaveSlimer @BywatersRobert @tezisold @_InThisTogether We know you use something like that just so you can hide your tracks -- too lazy or fearful that you will be found out to be a charlatan poseur if you actually maintained a blog or github site where you can maintain derivations. And heaven forbid you actually publish anything!
English
1
0
0
8
Bart Starr
Bart Starr@BStarr96522·
If it accesses the latest climate data like the WoodForTrees site, you can make the plots yourself. The bottom line is that the rate of change of atmospheric CO2 concentration is proportional to temperature anomaly. It fits both the short term and the long term. If you try to shoehorn anthro emissions into that dynamic, you’ll have to first get rid of that pesky long term trend that matches in the rate of change of CO2 and the temperature anomaly. That’s a problem because: A) why take out something that already matches? B) to take it out, you’ll have to assume some high pass process which removes it and leaves the variational parts, but that process will take out the long term anthro signal, too, so you’ll have to assume nature has some magical means of distinguishing between the two. It doesn’t work. The necessary conclusions are: 1) our emissions are puny compared to the natural flows and have insignificant impact 2) the impact of atmospheric CO2 concentration on global temperatures in the present climate state is essentially nil. Otherwise, we would have unstabilizable positive feedback and we would have spiraled into a saturation condition eons ago.
English
1
0
0
6
@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻
@nghoihin @BStarr96522 @TWTThisIsNow @FredHikes @patfrank830 @QI_181 @hairymarx1 @Konrad_Chapman @Frnc_prep @BrknMan @GlonvecHQ @PoyetPatrice @ICcrapdaily @ejwwest @priscian @CymaticWave @LxxResearcher @HeidlerNeal @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @AtomsksSanakan @ericonthetrail @dangerousbeenz @bobathon @Dooderoo @JoernWiedemann @OceanadeSilva @USAMRIID_CA @agentsinaction @FriedrichFiles @BatcaveSlimer @BywatersRobert @tezisold @_InThisTogether One of the issues is trying to find specific bits in a knowledgebase. You can either use random keyword search, or apply directed graphs to aid the indexing, which a wiki does well. The advantage here is that it then gives links to other ideas. A custom encyclopedia.
English
0
0
0
2
Bart Starr
Bart Starr@BStarr96522·
I don’t know how I could have made it more clear. I included links to a site where you could recreate the plots yourself, with all the options I used clearly printed in the plots. This goes beyond standard laboratory thermodynamics into the realm of transport phenomena over a massive and extensive volume.
English
1
0
0
9
@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻
@BStarr96522 @TWTThisIsNow @FredHikes @patfrank830 @QI_181 @hairymarx1 @Konrad_Chapman @Frnc_prep @BrknMan @GlonvecHQ @PoyetPatrice @ICcrapdaily @ejwwest @priscian @CymaticWave @LxxResearcher @HeidlerNeal @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @AtomsksSanakan @ericonthetrail @dangerousbeenz @bobathon @Dooderoo @JoernWiedemann @OceanadeSilva @USAMRIID_CA @agentsinaction @FriedrichFiles @BatcaveSlimer @BywatersRobert @tezisold @_InThisTogether That's the problem. We aren't mind readers. When you present something that is wrong from the accepted chemical thermodynamics, we try to deconstruct your scribblings. Or realize this may be your intent to mathematically equivocate and conflate. Infinite ways to get it wrong.
English
1
0
0
10
Bart Starr
Bart Starr@BStarr96522·
This is your third flail to try to insist that what the equation very clearly models isn’t really what the equation is modeling. First, you claimed it was really an equation of proportionality between CO2 and temperatures. When that didn’t fly, you tried to redefine the terms so that subtracting a rebaselined temperature anomaly became a differential quantity. It was gibberish. Now, you’re just throwing another forcing into the equation hoping to pack all the discrepancies in your pov into this undefined new entry. Stop. The rate of change of atmospheric CO2 concentration is proportional to appropriately baselined temperature anomaly. It accounts for the whole ball of wax. That’s it. Game over.
English
1
0
0
8
@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻
@BStarr96522 @TWTThisIsNow @patfrank830 @QI_181 @hairymarx1 @Konrad_Chapman @Frnc_prep @BrknMan @GlonvecHQ @PoyetPatrice @ICcrapdaily @ejwwest @priscian @CymaticWave @LxxResearcher @HeidlerNeal @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @AtomsksSanakan @ericonthetrail @dangerousbeenz @bobathon @Dooderoo @FredHikes @JoernWiedemann @OceanadeSilva @USAMRIID_CA @agentsinaction @FriedrichFiles @BatcaveSlimer @BywatersRobert @tezisold @_InThisTogether You had written dCO2/dt = k*(T - T0) Well, T-T0 is dT, as a differential, so equating 2 differential quantities. Otherwise, T is sitting at around 300 Kelvin and is essentially a constant. But you have no facility for math, so there's that.
English
1
0
2
38
Bart Starr
Bart Starr@BStarr96522·
It doesn't go as exp(at), dum-dum. Where do you see dT/dt ~ T anywhere in this plot? The phase of the variations is displaced 90 deg. Long term T is essentially affine and dT/dt is constant. You can't just make up a system like you want it to be. It has to relate at least tangentially (pun intended) to reality.
Bart Starr tweet media
English
1
0
0
28
Thomas Reis
Thomas Reis@peakaustria·
"Something strange is happening in the Pacific—and it doesn’t make sense at first glance." "Right now, the ocean is technically neutral. Nothing dramatic." "Nothing extreme." "And yet, two of the world’s most advanced climate models are quietly converging on the same outcome: a Super El Niño forming in 2026, with a magnitude not seen in a generation." Five months out from the Arctic Sea Ice minimum the data points to, not 'just' an El Niño but a Super El Niño! youtu.be/4UPj9RanA_Y
YouTube video
YouTube
Thomas Reis tweet media
Thomas Reis@peakaustria

Highly recommend this important video. A rare triple alignment in 3 ocean basins of a strong El Niño in the Pacific, a negative Indian Ocean Dipole, and an anomalously warm North Atlantic sea surface would produce huge impacts on global precipitation patterns creating an enormous shock to global food supply and distribution systems. The last time such an alignment occurred was in 1876-78 and is discussed in a 2018 paper by Singh et al: journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/…. That event was the largest disruption to the global food supply in the last 800 years and killed 30 to 50 million people through starvation and water shortages. Trends at the moment in each of the 3 ocean basins point to meeting the conditions for the alignment. If the alignment happens again this year it would be a tremendous test of our modern food supply system. Our higher baseline temperature now means more severe droughts, killer heatwaves, and catastrophic flooding would all likely be worse than in the Victorian era triple alignment. We won’t know if the alignment is likely for about 60 to 90 more days but the short necessary lead time to deal with the possibility means we need to begin preparing for it now. H/t John Scheve

English
12
121
434
33.5K
@Puͣkiͧte̍.com 🇱🇻
@HowToAI_ Many cases where just randomly testing excursions works better than computing a gradient descent direction. Put in a simulated annealing excursion and it can also escape local minima.
English
0
0
1
409
Rush Rush
Rush Rush@rushtropicalwx·
Serious question....What happens when the ocean and the atmosphere are both warm? Im thinking lapse rates and instability....Just spit balling....
Rush Rush tweet mediaRush Rush tweet mediaRush Rush tweet media
English
7
15
75
6.1K