willietrom

6.7K posts

willietrom

willietrom

@willietrom

Katılım Mart 2012
5.1K Takip Edilen83 Takipçiler
Eitan Fischberger
Eitan Fischberger@EFischberger·
It's long past past time for congressional and DOJ investigations into the foreign ties of Drop Site News. Here's what we know: 🔸️It has at least two "reporters" on the ground in Iran who feed the site regime-approved disinformation and propaganda. 🔸️As I previously uncovered, It has employed at least three Gazan "journalists" with ties to Hamas and Islamic Jihad. 🔸️It recieved at least a $250,000 grant from Soros' Open Society to launch a middle east desk. 🔸️It's published by billionaire communist nepo baby Nika Soon-Shiong. 🔸️Drop Site frequently flies (or is flown?) to the middle east to interview the leaders of U.S.-designated terrorist organizations. And by "interview," i mean massage them for 2.5 hours at a time. In fact, co-founder Jeremy Scahill's first act at Drop Site was a multi-part series of sit-down interviews with senior leaders of both terror groups. 🔸️ Drop Site's MENA editor, Sharif Abdel Kouddous, filed a sympathetic dispatch from the funeral of Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah after he was killed by Israel. 🔸️ Drop Site is fiscally sponsored by the Social Security Works Education Fund while it pursues its own 501(c)(3) status — an arrangement that reduces transparency and allows the outlet to obscure who its other funders are. Bonus: 🔸️Drop Site’s co-founder, Ryan Grim, has tweeted that "The U.S. is a rogue terror state and a cancer on the world" and called president Trump a terrorist.
Eitan Fischberger tweet media
Drop Site@DropSiteNews

Drop Site News reports on breaking events with clear sourcing and careful attribution, distinguishing between verified information and claims made by governments or state-linked outlets. In the post at issue (linked below), the information was explicitly identified as coming from Iranian state-linked media and framed as a claim, consistent with our standard editorial practice. Our coverage applies the same approach across all actors, including the United States, Israel, and Iran. In fast-moving conflicts, competing narratives are part of the story, and documenting what each side is saying is essential to understanding how events are being framed and interpreted in real time. As Drop Site reporter Ryan Grim wrote, “anybody who reads our Twitter feed knows that we regularly report official and semi-official statements… Our readers have enough sense not to believe everything every government says, but they do want to know what they’re saying in real time. Other readers, those not interested in knowing what governments adversarial to the U.S. are saying, have endless options to choose from, but we’re not one of them.” We do not limit our reporting to Western or allied sources. Providing visibility into claims made by all sides, with proper attribution, is a core part of our editorial approach. Regarding the reporting at issue, some have accused Drop Site of “promoting” Iranian propaganda for noting that U.S. forces were reportedly bombing areas where a missing airman was believed to be located. That element of the reporting, which we were among the first to surface, was later borne out by subsequent disclosures. Prior to that, we also reported information from journalist Jack Murphy—a U.S. military veteran—who said the recovery had been successful, with clear attribution. Our role is to provide audiences with the information needed to assess developments as they unfold. We do not withhold information from our audience merely because it comes from a source adversarial to the U.S. government, nor do we tell readers what to think. If this is the kind of journalism you think the world needs, link to subscribe is in our bio.

English
232
143
373
189.1K
Basel Musharbash
Basel Musharbash@musharbash_b·
Just a few months ago, @ezraklein called on Democrats to abandon reproductive rights, @mattyglesias called for Democrats to join Republicans in bullying trans kids, and many more in the Vox/Faux DC Centrism orbit called on Democrats to acquiesce in Trump's mass deportation schemes in order to "do what's popular" and "win elections." Following these recommendations would certainly have made the Democratic Party “a little more hateful, a little more misogynistic, a little more vulgar, and a little dumber” — but no one who has clutched their pearls over Hasan Piker in the last two weeks ever voiced any concerns about these leading lights of DC centrism when they pushed these reactionary positions. What gives? Considering @hasanthehun has never pushed the Democratic Party to adopt such wacko positions, he seems much better than Ezra Klein, Yglesias, and other Faux DC Centrists at keeping the Democratic Party "on the right side of history." I mean, if we win by throwing people under the bus as recommended by these amoral think-piece writers, would it even be worth it? What kind of victory would that even be?
Evan Rosenfeld@Evan_Rosenfeld

.@monacharen: Even if it were true that Dems would profit electorally by becoming a little more hateful, a little more misogynistic, a little friendlier to America’s authoritarian antagonists, a little more vulgar, and a little dumber—is it worth it? What kind of victory is that?

English
39
269
1.8K
65.7K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@zachlubarsky @musharbash_b @ezraklein @mattyglesias "Reeducation camps" just for funsies? Or did he explicitly advocate for them as a more humane alternative to our current prison system? Maybe there's an important context that you left out or never bothered learning here.
English
0
0
0
6
Zach Lubarsky
Zach Lubarsky@zachlubarsky·
@musharbash_b @ezraklein @mattyglesias Hasan Piker has in fact pushed the Democrats to adopt wacko positions. He just reaffirmed today that Dems should allow Russia to annex Ukraine. He has advocated for reeducation camps too.
English
7
0
2
1.1K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@zachlubarsky @revengeofthese2 @musharbash_b @ezraklein @mattyglesias Piker never advocated that the Democratic Party stop Ukrainians from fighting. What he did advocate was for Biden to push for ceasefire negotiations when Ukraine was winning and was in a position to emerge without any lost territory. Biden opted to let Ukraine and Russia bleed.
English
0
0
0
25
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@adamwren @playbookdc @AbdulElSayed @hasanthehun Is this supposed to cause us to rush to our fainting couches or something? One politician calls other politicians "garbage" and falsely accuses them of marrying their brothers or committing crimes and then another politician doesn't care when they're called names back. Yawn.
English
0
0
0
110
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@CantEverDie catturd's tweets are so empty of style and thoughtfulness that the account could have been sold a dozen times between those two tweets and no one would be able to tell
English
0
0
1
146
onion person
onion person@CantEverDie·
the way people have absolutely zero principles genuinely disturbs me. they believe nothing and will say anything that brings them their next paycheck. this is no way to live. it’s disgusting. i do not understand how this isn’t a bot and an actual real human being
Political Punk@actingliketommy

A Tale of Two Catturds

English
71
1.4K
14K
230.1K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@mattyglesias Democrats said for decades that they couldn't get rid of the filibuster because they would need to use it in case a fascist ever got in office. There is now someone they claim is a fascist in office and you are pointing to tweets because they have not filibustered a single thing.
English
0
0
1
22
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
One problem for Democrats is that left-wing people pretend they aren’t doing stuff that they are in fact doing in order to further fuel the flames of anti-establishment sentiment.
Matthew Yglesias tweet mediaMatthew Yglesias tweet media
English
490
138
1.4K
433.4K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@brianschatz Until y'all publish your calendar of days on which you consider it appropriate to ask for improvement, this will always come off as being opposed to any ask for improvement.
English
0
0
1
8
Brian Schatz
Brian Schatz@brianschatz·
If you are still doing discourse, today, about tactical choices that Democrats should make, you have lost the plot. Time and place for everything.
English
238
134
1.1K
117.9K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@nikillinit @maiamindel ...or polling them. You can just do public opinion polls, and the framework for analyzing their connection to consensus opinions are far-better established than prediction markets. Prediction markets have gotten plenty wrong, and arbitrage between markets harms reproducibility.
English
0
0
3
73
Nikhil Krishnan
Nikhil Krishnan@nikillinit·
@maiamindel While I think prediction markets are bad for a lot of reasons, this is basically their argument for why they’re important. The only way to now verify consensus opinions is by forcing people to put their money where their mouth is
English
8
0
33
2.7K
Maia
Maia@maiamindel·
we're reaching john stuart mill levels of absurd "thought experimetns are just as good as real experiments" scientism with this one
Maia tweet media
English
61
919
6K
164.9K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@mdubowitz Do you feel like the "talent pipelines" for the US's and for Israel's military industrial complexes are also legitimate targets, or is this just chauvinism?
English
0
0
0
25
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@DanFriedman81 Is there any more recent polling on these figures we can look to? From what I'm seeing the answer is "yes" and it entirely undermines your argument.
English
0
0
0
28
Daniel Friedman
Daniel Friedman@DanFriedman81·
Mamdani won with the lowest share of the vote of any mayor in decades. He got 50.7% of the vote in an 85% Democratic city. He does not have a mandate to transform New York, and no amount of followers in the developing world is going to change that. Hochul, Menin and many other New York politicians are going to learn that they can build their platforms and their legacies by resisting the crazy agenda of this polarizing extremist mayor.
Asad🗽🍎@AsadFromNYC

“Mamdani has almost 15 million followers, and his base remains deeply devoted. They’re ready for a fight. What happens when the messaging apparatus that helped unravel Cuomo is aimed at someone else? Hochul and Menin may find out sooner rather than later.” nymag.com/intelligencer/…

English
182
155
1.3K
213.5K
Drew Grimaldi
Drew Grimaldi@Grimillionaire·
@politico This is fucking stupid. First you call Trump a NAZI which he isnt. Then you say he is too cozy with Israel... now we are back to Nazi again huh? Politico is such a fraud. Who reads this garbage?
English
9
0
7
1.4K
POLITICO
POLITICO@politico·
‘Proactively fall in line:’ Holocaust Memorial Museum quietly changed content after Trump returned to office dlvr.it/TRtRwc
English
36
182
371
248.7K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@kenklippenstein Keep it up. Even if you don't succeed in time for it to save lives or resources, some historian will be forced to mention you just so they don't falsely say "no journalists reported on it at the time".
English
0
0
3
378
Ken Klippenstein
Ken Klippenstein@kenklippenstein·
Tried my best to push NSPM-7 into the public discourse. Not sure how much success I had lol
English
122
457
6.7K
126.6K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@1ShaynaMaidel @w8wuttt Would you like us to list all of the ways in which they are analogous or would you like to start by mentioning a way in which they aren't?
English
0
0
1
43
Shayna Maidel
Shayna Maidel@1ShaynaMaidel·
Palestinians are stuck in limbo because they don’t accept Israel’s existence, which is not negotiable. Giving a vote to a hostile population that actively wants to overthrow your county and form the umpteenth Islamic state is dumb and nobody in Israel’s situation would do that.
Jacobin@jacobin

The question "Does Israel have a right to exist?" isn't a real inquiry about the rights of nations. It's a manipulation of discourse, a litmus test that forces Palestinians to offer theoretical assurances before their real political grievances can even be heard. jacobin.com/2026/04/israel…

English
75
88
1.2K
69K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@1ShaynaMaidel The only reason people consider Israel's existence less negotiable than Palestine's is because US lends its power to Israel and not to Palestine. But, over the long term, who the US lends its power to is determined by politics. The politics are changing...
English
0
0
0
57
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@SarahLongwell25 @SirWirtz He was expressing the same ideas as expressed in this passage, just with sloppier language. (He has since apologized for using the phrase "America deserved" since most people understand that to mean the American victims deserved it rather than it being a consequence of US policy)
willietrom tweet media
English
0
1
8
516
Sarah Longwell
Sarah Longwell@SarahLongwell25·
Look, the dumbest thing about all this is that I didn’t and don’t care about Piker. Piker never comes up in focus groups with voters as someone they’re following—the way a Rogan or Tucker or Candance does. I don’t think he’s singularly making an impact on politics in any way commensurate with the attention he’s getting. But I care about Tim. I agreed with @Timodc’s original point that using Piker as a litmus test is dumb. Calling up Jon Ossoff to ask what he thinks about Piker is dumb. It is an unnecessary distraction. But I felt like Tim’s discussion of Piker was too dismissive of some of Pikers more toxic positions. And that was the part I wanted to react to. There’s nothing I can do about the fact that the internet distortion field has overtaken the whole thing. And that people are debating my views in a way that is totally divorced from my actual, very-well documented views. That’s just part of what happens when doing this work. The only thing I can do is keep saying what I actually believe. And what I hear voters saying they believe. But politicians can reach voters who are angry about the Iran war and even about America’s relationship to Israel without going on the stream of a guy who said America deserved 9/11. But, it’s also no doubt true that he’s being elevated by the whole conversation and the right answer to questions about him should probably be “Piker, who?” Because that’s what most voters would say if you asked them.
Shannon Watts@shannonrwatts

Anyone who listened to this fair, thorough and nuanced discussion on the Bulwark knows that @SarahLongwell25 cares much more about the survival of democracy and the Democratic Party than herself. Listen for yourself instead of taking the bait.

English
555
155
1.4K
512.5K
Isotonic
Isotonic@Isotoni54631121·
@hasanthehun i bet Hasan leaned in real close and squinted and went through each individual circle, even the red ones incase they misplaced him, to try and find himself.
English
2
0
6
2.2K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@dearmattdearing @Berkeleykid96 "The only people doing this were far lefties!" *is shown the literal leader of the far right party doing it* "Ah, nevertheless, the far right only did this because the far left did! The insignificant far left that only exists online and has zero influence! Too strong and weak!"
English
1
0
0
15
Matt Dearing 🇺🇸
Matt Dearing 🇺🇸@dearmattdearing·
The only people who branded Harris a war hawk for campaigning with Cheney were other far lefties lmao. Cheney's entire involvement was solely about J6 & democracy protection but people who were looking for reasons decided to twist it into something about foreign policy.
Bhavik Lathia@bhaviklathia

No, you’re misunderstanding the fundamental point. It wasn’t just campaigning with Liz Cheney. It was branding Harris as a war hawk. That is what was stupid and harmful. Cheney was just one part of that harmful strategy. Swing state voters are extremely antiwar.

English
12
2
5
11.8K
willietrom
willietrom@willietrom·
@SarahLongwell25 admitting you slander people at length on your podcast without even caring about them is giving psychopath
English
0
0
0
18